Persistent paper: the myth of "going paperless".

Richard H. Dykstra; Joan S. Ash; Emily Campbell; Dean F. Sittig; Ken Guappone; James Carpenter; Joshua Richardson; Adam Wright; Carmit McMullen

Persistent paper: the myth of "going paperless".

Richard H. Dykstra, Joan S. Ash, Emily Campbell, Dean F. Sittig, Ken Guappone, James Carpenter, Joshua Richardson, Adam Wright, Carmit McMullen

Medical Informatics & Clinical Epidemiology

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

25 Scopus citations

Abstract

How does paper usage change following the introduction of Computerized Physician Order Entry and the Electronic Medical Record (EMR/CPOE)? To answer that question we analyzed data collected from fourteen sites across the U.S. We found paper in widespread use in all institutions we studied. Analysis revealed psychological, ergonomic, technological, and regulatory reasons for the persistence of paper in an electronic environment. Paper has unique attributes allowing it to fill gaps in information timeliness, availability, and reliability in pursuit of improved patient care. Creative uses have led to "better paper."

Original language	English (US)
Pages (from-to)	158-162
Number of pages	5
Journal	AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings / AMIA Symposium. AMIA Symposium
Volume	2009
State	Published - 2009

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Medicine(all)

Cite this

@article{303efe6ed54a420997cd3b913214b584,

title = "Persistent paper: the myth of {"}going paperless{"}.",

abstract = "How does paper usage change following the introduction of Computerized Physician Order Entry and the Electronic Medical Record (EMR/CPOE)? To answer that question we analyzed data collected from fourteen sites across the U.S. We found paper in widespread use in all institutions we studied. Analysis revealed psychological, ergonomic, technological, and regulatory reasons for the persistence of paper in an electronic environment. Paper has unique attributes allowing it to fill gaps in information timeliness, availability, and reliability in pursuit of improved patient care. Creative uses have led to {"}better paper.{"}",

author = "Dykstra, {Richard H.} and Ash, {Joan S.} and Emily Campbell and Sittig, {Dean F.} and Ken Guappone and James Carpenter and Joshua Richardson and Adam Wright and Carmit McMullen",

note = "Copyright: This record is sourced from MEDLINE{\textregistered}/PubMed{\textregistered}, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine",

year = "2009",

language = "English (US)",

volume = "2009",

pages = "158--162",

journal = "AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings / AMIA Symposium. AMIA Symposium",

issn = "1559-4076",

publisher = "American Medical Informatics Association",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Persistent paper

T2 - the myth of "going paperless".

AU - Dykstra, Richard H.

AU - Ash, Joan S.

AU - Campbell, Emily

AU - Sittig, Dean F.

AU - Guappone, Ken

AU - Carpenter, James

AU - Richardson, Joshua

AU - Wright, Adam

AU - McMullen, Carmit

N1 - Copyright: This record is sourced from MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine

PY - 2009

Y1 - 2009

N2 - How does paper usage change following the introduction of Computerized Physician Order Entry and the Electronic Medical Record (EMR/CPOE)? To answer that question we analyzed data collected from fourteen sites across the U.S. We found paper in widespread use in all institutions we studied. Analysis revealed psychological, ergonomic, technological, and regulatory reasons for the persistence of paper in an electronic environment. Paper has unique attributes allowing it to fill gaps in information timeliness, availability, and reliability in pursuit of improved patient care. Creative uses have led to "better paper."

AB - How does paper usage change following the introduction of Computerized Physician Order Entry and the Electronic Medical Record (EMR/CPOE)? To answer that question we analyzed data collected from fourteen sites across the U.S. We found paper in widespread use in all institutions we studied. Analysis revealed psychological, ergonomic, technological, and regulatory reasons for the persistence of paper in an electronic environment. Paper has unique attributes allowing it to fill gaps in information timeliness, availability, and reliability in pursuit of improved patient care. Creative uses have led to "better paper."

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79953777040&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79953777040&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 20351841

AN - SCOPUS:79953777040

VL - 2009

SP - 158

EP - 162

JO - AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings / AMIA Symposium. AMIA Symposium

JF - AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings / AMIA Symposium. AMIA Symposium

SN - 1559-4076

ER -

Persistent paper: the myth of "going paperless".

Abstract

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this