TY - GEN
T1 - Performance of an automated renal segmentation algorithm based on morphological erosion and connectivity
AU - Abiri, Benjamin
AU - Park, Brian
AU - Chandarana, Hersh
AU - Mikheev, Artem
AU - Lee, Vivian S.
AU - Rusinek, Henry
PY - 2014
Y1 - 2014
N2 - The precision, accuracy, and efficiency of a novel semi-automated renal segmentation technique for volumetric interpolated breath-hold sequence (VIBE ) MRI sequences was analyzed using 7 clinical datasets (14 kidneys). Two observers performed whole-kidney segmentation using EdgeWave segmentation software based on constrained morphological growth. Ground truths were prepared by manual tracing of kidney on each of approximately 40 slices. Using the software, the average inter-observer disagreement was 2.7%± 2.1% for whole kidney volume, 2.1%± 1.8% for cortex, and 4.1%± 3.2% for medulla. In comparison to the ground truth kidney volume, the error was 2.8%± 2.5% for whole kidney volume, 3.1%± 1.7% for cortex, and 3.6%±.3.1% for medulla. It took an average of 4:14±1:42 minutes of operator time, plus 2:56± 1:23 minutes of computer time to perform segmentation of one whole kidney, cortex, and medulla. Segmentation speed, inter-observer agreement and accuracy were several times better than those of our existing graph-cuts segmentation technique requiring approximately 20 minutes per case and with 7-10% error. With the expedited image processing, high inter-observer agreement, and volumes closely matching true values, kidney volumetry becomes a reality in many clinical applications.
AB - The precision, accuracy, and efficiency of a novel semi-automated renal segmentation technique for volumetric interpolated breath-hold sequence (VIBE ) MRI sequences was analyzed using 7 clinical datasets (14 kidneys). Two observers performed whole-kidney segmentation using EdgeWave segmentation software based on constrained morphological growth. Ground truths were prepared by manual tracing of kidney on each of approximately 40 slices. Using the software, the average inter-observer disagreement was 2.7%± 2.1% for whole kidney volume, 2.1%± 1.8% for cortex, and 4.1%± 3.2% for medulla. In comparison to the ground truth kidney volume, the error was 2.8%± 2.5% for whole kidney volume, 3.1%± 1.7% for cortex, and 3.6%±.3.1% for medulla. It took an average of 4:14±1:42 minutes of operator time, plus 2:56± 1:23 minutes of computer time to perform segmentation of one whole kidney, cortex, and medulla. Segmentation speed, inter-observer agreement and accuracy were several times better than those of our existing graph-cuts segmentation technique requiring approximately 20 minutes per case and with 7-10% error. With the expedited image processing, high inter-observer agreement, and volumes closely matching true values, kidney volumetry becomes a reality in many clinical applications.
KW - Computer-Aided Diagnosis
KW - Image perception and observer performance
KW - Image Processing
KW - Kidney
KW - MR-GFR
KW - Renal Volumetry
KW - Segmentation
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84902097095&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84902097095&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1117/12.2043596
DO - 10.1117/12.2043596
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:84902097095
SN - 9780819498281
T3 - Progress in Biomedical Optics and Imaging - Proceedings of SPIE
BT - Medical Imaging 2014
PB - SPIE
T2 - Medical Imaging 2014: Computer-Aided Diagnosis
Y2 - 18 February 2014 through 20 February 2014
ER -