Performance Comparison Between Optoelectronic and VLSI Multistage Interconnection Networks

Fouad E. Kiamilev, Philippe Marchand, Ashok V. Krishnamoorthy, Sadik Esener, Sing H. Lee

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

96 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The performance characteristics of optoelectronic and VLSI multistage interconnection networks are compared. The bases of the comparison include speed, bandwidth, power consumption, and footprint area. The communication network used in the comparison is a synchronous packet-switched multistage interconnection network built from 2 × 2 bit-serial switching elements. CMOS technology is used in the VLSI implementation, and it is assumed that the entire network resides on a single chip. Regular free-space optical interconnects are used in the optoelectronic implementation and it is assumed that modulators and detectors are integrated with electronic circuitry. Both implementations rely on existing widely used components and design methods. The results show that for large networks optoelectronics offers higher speed and lower area than VLSI. The speed of the optoelectronic network remains constant as the network grows, while the VLSI network speed diminishes as O(1/N due to wire delay. The area of the optoelectronic network grows as O(N · log N), while the VLSI network area grows as O(N2· log N). The volume of the optoelectronic network grows as O(N3/2 · log N). Based on the assumed technology parameters, optoelectronics outperforms VLSI in bandwidth for network sizes above 256. The methodology developed in this paper can be applied to other communication networks and technologies.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1674-1692
Number of pages19
JournalJournal of Lightwave Technology
Volume9
Issue number12
DOIs
StatePublished - 1991
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

very large scale integration
Optoelectronic devices
Telecommunication networks
communication networks
Bandwidth
Optical interconnects
Switching networks
free-space optical interconnects
Modulators
bandwidth
switching circuits
Electric power utilization
Wire
footprints
Detectors
modulators
CMOS
chips
high speed
wire

Keywords

  • interconnection networks
  • optical interconnects
  • optoelectronic computing

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering

Cite this

Performance Comparison Between Optoelectronic and VLSI Multistage Interconnection Networks. / Kiamilev, Fouad E.; Marchand, Philippe; Krishnamoorthy, Ashok V.; Esener, Sadik; Lee, Sing H.

In: Journal of Lightwave Technology, Vol. 9, No. 12, 1991, p. 1674-1692.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Kiamilev, Fouad E. ; Marchand, Philippe ; Krishnamoorthy, Ashok V. ; Esener, Sadik ; Lee, Sing H. / Performance Comparison Between Optoelectronic and VLSI Multistage Interconnection Networks. In: Journal of Lightwave Technology. 1991 ; Vol. 9, No. 12. pp. 1674-1692.
@article{e2ab8188e84548aa97e580b00bfb2aa1,
title = "Performance Comparison Between Optoelectronic and VLSI Multistage Interconnection Networks",
abstract = "The performance characteristics of optoelectronic and VLSI multistage interconnection networks are compared. The bases of the comparison include speed, bandwidth, power consumption, and footprint area. The communication network used in the comparison is a synchronous packet-switched multistage interconnection network built from 2 × 2 bit-serial switching elements. CMOS technology is used in the VLSI implementation, and it is assumed that the entire network resides on a single chip. Regular free-space optical interconnects are used in the optoelectronic implementation and it is assumed that modulators and detectors are integrated with electronic circuitry. Both implementations rely on existing widely used components and design methods. The results show that for large networks optoelectronics offers higher speed and lower area than VLSI. The speed of the optoelectronic network remains constant as the network grows, while the VLSI network speed diminishes as O(1/N due to wire delay. The area of the optoelectronic network grows as O(N · log N), while the VLSI network area grows as O(N2· log N). The volume of the optoelectronic network grows as O(N3/2 · log N). Based on the assumed technology parameters, optoelectronics outperforms VLSI in bandwidth for network sizes above 256. The methodology developed in this paper can be applied to other communication networks and technologies.",
keywords = "interconnection networks, optical interconnects, optoelectronic computing",
author = "Kiamilev, {Fouad E.} and Philippe Marchand and Krishnamoorthy, {Ashok V.} and Sadik Esener and Lee, {Sing H.}",
year = "1991",
doi = "10.1109/50.108713",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "9",
pages = "1674--1692",
journal = "Journal of Lightwave Technology",
issn = "0733-8724",
publisher = "Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.",
number = "12",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Performance Comparison Between Optoelectronic and VLSI Multistage Interconnection Networks

AU - Kiamilev, Fouad E.

AU - Marchand, Philippe

AU - Krishnamoorthy, Ashok V.

AU - Esener, Sadik

AU - Lee, Sing H.

PY - 1991

Y1 - 1991

N2 - The performance characteristics of optoelectronic and VLSI multistage interconnection networks are compared. The bases of the comparison include speed, bandwidth, power consumption, and footprint area. The communication network used in the comparison is a synchronous packet-switched multistage interconnection network built from 2 × 2 bit-serial switching elements. CMOS technology is used in the VLSI implementation, and it is assumed that the entire network resides on a single chip. Regular free-space optical interconnects are used in the optoelectronic implementation and it is assumed that modulators and detectors are integrated with electronic circuitry. Both implementations rely on existing widely used components and design methods. The results show that for large networks optoelectronics offers higher speed and lower area than VLSI. The speed of the optoelectronic network remains constant as the network grows, while the VLSI network speed diminishes as O(1/N due to wire delay. The area of the optoelectronic network grows as O(N · log N), while the VLSI network area grows as O(N2· log N). The volume of the optoelectronic network grows as O(N3/2 · log N). Based on the assumed technology parameters, optoelectronics outperforms VLSI in bandwidth for network sizes above 256. The methodology developed in this paper can be applied to other communication networks and technologies.

AB - The performance characteristics of optoelectronic and VLSI multistage interconnection networks are compared. The bases of the comparison include speed, bandwidth, power consumption, and footprint area. The communication network used in the comparison is a synchronous packet-switched multistage interconnection network built from 2 × 2 bit-serial switching elements. CMOS technology is used in the VLSI implementation, and it is assumed that the entire network resides on a single chip. Regular free-space optical interconnects are used in the optoelectronic implementation and it is assumed that modulators and detectors are integrated with electronic circuitry. Both implementations rely on existing widely used components and design methods. The results show that for large networks optoelectronics offers higher speed and lower area than VLSI. The speed of the optoelectronic network remains constant as the network grows, while the VLSI network speed diminishes as O(1/N due to wire delay. The area of the optoelectronic network grows as O(N · log N), while the VLSI network area grows as O(N2· log N). The volume of the optoelectronic network grows as O(N3/2 · log N). Based on the assumed technology parameters, optoelectronics outperforms VLSI in bandwidth for network sizes above 256. The methodology developed in this paper can be applied to other communication networks and technologies.

KW - interconnection networks

KW - optical interconnects

KW - optoelectronic computing

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0026381433&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0026381433&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1109/50.108713

DO - 10.1109/50.108713

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0026381433

VL - 9

SP - 1674

EP - 1692

JO - Journal of Lightwave Technology

JF - Journal of Lightwave Technology

SN - 0733-8724

IS - 12

ER -