Perceptions of shared decision making and decision aids among rural primary care clinicians

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

21 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background. Shared decision making (SDM) and decision aids (DAs) increase patients involvement in health care decisions and enhance satisfaction with their choices. Studies of SDM and DAs have primarily occurred in academic centers and large health systems, but most primary care is delivered in smaller practices, and over 20% of Americans live in rural areas, where poverty, disease prevalence, and limited access to care may increase the need for SDM and DAs. Objective. To explore perceptions and practices of rural primary care clinicians regarding SDM and DAs. Design. Cross-sectional survey. Setting and Participants. Primary care clinicians affiliated with the Oregon Rural Practice-based Research Network. Results. Surveys were returned by 181 of 231 ligible participants (78%); 174 could be analyzed. Two-thirds of participants were physicians, 84% practiced family medicine,and 55% were male. Sixty-five percent of respondents were unfamiliar with the term shared decision making, but following definition, 97% reported that they found the approach useful for conditions with multiple treatment options. Over 90% of clinicians perceived helping patients make decisions regarding chronic pain and health behavior change as moderate/hard in difficulty. Although 69% of respondents preferred that patients play an equal role in making decisions, they stimate that this happens only 35% of the time. Time was reported as the largest barrier to engaging in SDM (63%). Respondents were receptive to using DAs to facilitate SDM in print- (95%) or web-based formats (72%), and topic preference varied by clinician specialty and decision difficulty. Conclusions. Rural clinicians recognized the value of SDM and were receptive to using DAs in multiple formats. Integration of DAs to facilitate SDM in routine patient care may require addressing practice operation and reimbursement.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)636-644
Number of pages9
JournalMedical Decision Making
Volume32
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 2012

Fingerprint

Decision Support Techniques
Primary Health Care
Decision Making
Poverty Areas
Patient Participation
Health Behavior
Chronic Pain
Patient Care
Cross-Sectional Studies
Medicine
Delivery of Health Care
Physicians

Keywords

  • decision aid tools
  • primary care
  • shared decision making
  • statistical methods
  • survey methods
  • translating research into practice

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health Policy
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

@article{066cc471d0724ce4885b6cd5a5f246e4,
title = "Perceptions of shared decision making and decision aids among rural primary care clinicians",
abstract = "Background. Shared decision making (SDM) and decision aids (DAs) increase patients involvement in health care decisions and enhance satisfaction with their choices. Studies of SDM and DAs have primarily occurred in academic centers and large health systems, but most primary care is delivered in smaller practices, and over 20{\%} of Americans live in rural areas, where poverty, disease prevalence, and limited access to care may increase the need for SDM and DAs. Objective. To explore perceptions and practices of rural primary care clinicians regarding SDM and DAs. Design. Cross-sectional survey. Setting and Participants. Primary care clinicians affiliated with the Oregon Rural Practice-based Research Network. Results. Surveys were returned by 181 of 231 ligible participants (78{\%}); 174 could be analyzed. Two-thirds of participants were physicians, 84{\%} practiced family medicine,and 55{\%} were male. Sixty-five percent of respondents were unfamiliar with the term shared decision making, but following definition, 97{\%} reported that they found the approach useful for conditions with multiple treatment options. Over 90{\%} of clinicians perceived helping patients make decisions regarding chronic pain and health behavior change as moderate/hard in difficulty. Although 69{\%} of respondents preferred that patients play an equal role in making decisions, they stimate that this happens only 35{\%} of the time. Time was reported as the largest barrier to engaging in SDM (63{\%}). Respondents were receptive to using DAs to facilitate SDM in print- (95{\%}) or web-based formats (72{\%}), and topic preference varied by clinician specialty and decision difficulty. Conclusions. Rural clinicians recognized the value of SDM and were receptive to using DAs in multiple formats. Integration of DAs to facilitate SDM in routine patient care may require addressing practice operation and reimbursement.",
keywords = "decision aid tools, primary care, shared decision making, statistical methods, survey methods, translating research into practice",
author = "Valerie King and Melinda Davis and Paul Gorman and Rugge, {John (Bruin)} and Lyle Fagnan",
year = "2012",
month = "7",
doi = "10.1177/0272989X11431961",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "32",
pages = "636--644",
journal = "Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making",
issn = "0272-989X",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Perceptions of shared decision making and decision aids among rural primary care clinicians

AU - King, Valerie

AU - Davis, Melinda

AU - Gorman, Paul

AU - Rugge, John (Bruin)

AU - Fagnan, Lyle

PY - 2012/7

Y1 - 2012/7

N2 - Background. Shared decision making (SDM) and decision aids (DAs) increase patients involvement in health care decisions and enhance satisfaction with their choices. Studies of SDM and DAs have primarily occurred in academic centers and large health systems, but most primary care is delivered in smaller practices, and over 20% of Americans live in rural areas, where poverty, disease prevalence, and limited access to care may increase the need for SDM and DAs. Objective. To explore perceptions and practices of rural primary care clinicians regarding SDM and DAs. Design. Cross-sectional survey. Setting and Participants. Primary care clinicians affiliated with the Oregon Rural Practice-based Research Network. Results. Surveys were returned by 181 of 231 ligible participants (78%); 174 could be analyzed. Two-thirds of participants were physicians, 84% practiced family medicine,and 55% were male. Sixty-five percent of respondents were unfamiliar with the term shared decision making, but following definition, 97% reported that they found the approach useful for conditions with multiple treatment options. Over 90% of clinicians perceived helping patients make decisions regarding chronic pain and health behavior change as moderate/hard in difficulty. Although 69% of respondents preferred that patients play an equal role in making decisions, they stimate that this happens only 35% of the time. Time was reported as the largest barrier to engaging in SDM (63%). Respondents were receptive to using DAs to facilitate SDM in print- (95%) or web-based formats (72%), and topic preference varied by clinician specialty and decision difficulty. Conclusions. Rural clinicians recognized the value of SDM and were receptive to using DAs in multiple formats. Integration of DAs to facilitate SDM in routine patient care may require addressing practice operation and reimbursement.

AB - Background. Shared decision making (SDM) and decision aids (DAs) increase patients involvement in health care decisions and enhance satisfaction with their choices. Studies of SDM and DAs have primarily occurred in academic centers and large health systems, but most primary care is delivered in smaller practices, and over 20% of Americans live in rural areas, where poverty, disease prevalence, and limited access to care may increase the need for SDM and DAs. Objective. To explore perceptions and practices of rural primary care clinicians regarding SDM and DAs. Design. Cross-sectional survey. Setting and Participants. Primary care clinicians affiliated with the Oregon Rural Practice-based Research Network. Results. Surveys were returned by 181 of 231 ligible participants (78%); 174 could be analyzed. Two-thirds of participants were physicians, 84% practiced family medicine,and 55% were male. Sixty-five percent of respondents were unfamiliar with the term shared decision making, but following definition, 97% reported that they found the approach useful for conditions with multiple treatment options. Over 90% of clinicians perceived helping patients make decisions regarding chronic pain and health behavior change as moderate/hard in difficulty. Although 69% of respondents preferred that patients play an equal role in making decisions, they stimate that this happens only 35% of the time. Time was reported as the largest barrier to engaging in SDM (63%). Respondents were receptive to using DAs to facilitate SDM in print- (95%) or web-based formats (72%), and topic preference varied by clinician specialty and decision difficulty. Conclusions. Rural clinicians recognized the value of SDM and were receptive to using DAs in multiple formats. Integration of DAs to facilitate SDM in routine patient care may require addressing practice operation and reimbursement.

KW - decision aid tools

KW - primary care

KW - shared decision making

KW - statistical methods

KW - survey methods

KW - translating research into practice

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84864252607&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84864252607&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0272989X11431961

DO - 10.1177/0272989X11431961

M3 - Article

C2 - 22247423

AN - SCOPUS:84864252607

VL - 32

SP - 636

EP - 644

JO - Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making

JF - Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making

SN - 0272-989X

IS - 4

ER -