Perception Versus Reaction

Comparison of Tinnitus Psychoacoustic Measures and Tinnitus Functional Index Scores

Candice Manning, Emily J. Thielman, Leslie Grush, James Henry

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose Psychoacoustic characteristics of tinnitus include its loudness and pitch. These characteristics are commonly measured and reported; however, it has not been shown that they are associated with the impact, or bothersomeness, of tinnitus. This study addressed this question by determining correlations between measures of tinnitus loudness, tinnitus pitch, and functional effects of tinnitus. Method Tinnitus loudness matches, pitch matches, a numeric rating scale (NRS) of tinnitus loudness, and responses to the 25-item tinnitus functional index (TFI) were obtained from 223 participants who experienced tinnitus for at least 6 months. Estimates of tinnitus pitch were calculated by use of a Bayesian sequential analysis technique. Results The total TFI score, as well as each of its 8 subscales, had weak or no correlations with both loudness matches and pitch matches, but moderate correlations with the NRS. Conclusions Psychoacoustic measurements used to estimate aspects of tinnitus perception appear unrelated to the impact of tinnitus, as assessed by a subjective outcome instrument. These psychoacoustic measurements do not assess reactions to tinnitus. These reactions should be measured by validated questionnaires, such as the TFI, which are designed to measure tinnitus impact. The moderate correlations between the NRS and the TFI suggest that self-reported tinnitus loudness is more a measure of tinnitus reactions than perception.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)174-180
Number of pages7
JournalAmerican journal of audiology
Volume28
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 22 2019
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Psychoacoustics
Tinnitus

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Speech and Hearing

Cite this

Perception Versus Reaction : Comparison of Tinnitus Psychoacoustic Measures and Tinnitus Functional Index Scores. / Manning, Candice; Thielman, Emily J.; Grush, Leslie; Henry, James.

In: American journal of audiology, Vol. 28, No. 1, 22.04.2019, p. 174-180.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{a99ee60bef674427985fff18a9c832c3,
title = "Perception Versus Reaction: Comparison of Tinnitus Psychoacoustic Measures and Tinnitus Functional Index Scores",
abstract = "Purpose Psychoacoustic characteristics of tinnitus include its loudness and pitch. These characteristics are commonly measured and reported; however, it has not been shown that they are associated with the impact, or bothersomeness, of tinnitus. This study addressed this question by determining correlations between measures of tinnitus loudness, tinnitus pitch, and functional effects of tinnitus. Method Tinnitus loudness matches, pitch matches, a numeric rating scale (NRS) of tinnitus loudness, and responses to the 25-item tinnitus functional index (TFI) were obtained from 223 participants who experienced tinnitus for at least 6 months. Estimates of tinnitus pitch were calculated by use of a Bayesian sequential analysis technique. Results The total TFI score, as well as each of its 8 subscales, had weak or no correlations with both loudness matches and pitch matches, but moderate correlations with the NRS. Conclusions Psychoacoustic measurements used to estimate aspects of tinnitus perception appear unrelated to the impact of tinnitus, as assessed by a subjective outcome instrument. These psychoacoustic measurements do not assess reactions to tinnitus. These reactions should be measured by validated questionnaires, such as the TFI, which are designed to measure tinnitus impact. The moderate correlations between the NRS and the TFI suggest that self-reported tinnitus loudness is more a measure of tinnitus reactions than perception.",
author = "Candice Manning and Thielman, {Emily J.} and Leslie Grush and James Henry",
year = "2019",
month = "4",
day = "22",
doi = "10.1044/2018_AJA-TTR17-18-0041",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "28",
pages = "174--180",
journal = "American Journal of Audiology",
issn = "1059-0889",
publisher = "American Speech-Language-Hearing Association (ASHA)",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Perception Versus Reaction

T2 - Comparison of Tinnitus Psychoacoustic Measures and Tinnitus Functional Index Scores

AU - Manning, Candice

AU - Thielman, Emily J.

AU - Grush, Leslie

AU - Henry, James

PY - 2019/4/22

Y1 - 2019/4/22

N2 - Purpose Psychoacoustic characteristics of tinnitus include its loudness and pitch. These characteristics are commonly measured and reported; however, it has not been shown that they are associated with the impact, or bothersomeness, of tinnitus. This study addressed this question by determining correlations between measures of tinnitus loudness, tinnitus pitch, and functional effects of tinnitus. Method Tinnitus loudness matches, pitch matches, a numeric rating scale (NRS) of tinnitus loudness, and responses to the 25-item tinnitus functional index (TFI) were obtained from 223 participants who experienced tinnitus for at least 6 months. Estimates of tinnitus pitch were calculated by use of a Bayesian sequential analysis technique. Results The total TFI score, as well as each of its 8 subscales, had weak or no correlations with both loudness matches and pitch matches, but moderate correlations with the NRS. Conclusions Psychoacoustic measurements used to estimate aspects of tinnitus perception appear unrelated to the impact of tinnitus, as assessed by a subjective outcome instrument. These psychoacoustic measurements do not assess reactions to tinnitus. These reactions should be measured by validated questionnaires, such as the TFI, which are designed to measure tinnitus impact. The moderate correlations between the NRS and the TFI suggest that self-reported tinnitus loudness is more a measure of tinnitus reactions than perception.

AB - Purpose Psychoacoustic characteristics of tinnitus include its loudness and pitch. These characteristics are commonly measured and reported; however, it has not been shown that they are associated with the impact, or bothersomeness, of tinnitus. This study addressed this question by determining correlations between measures of tinnitus loudness, tinnitus pitch, and functional effects of tinnitus. Method Tinnitus loudness matches, pitch matches, a numeric rating scale (NRS) of tinnitus loudness, and responses to the 25-item tinnitus functional index (TFI) were obtained from 223 participants who experienced tinnitus for at least 6 months. Estimates of tinnitus pitch were calculated by use of a Bayesian sequential analysis technique. Results The total TFI score, as well as each of its 8 subscales, had weak or no correlations with both loudness matches and pitch matches, but moderate correlations with the NRS. Conclusions Psychoacoustic measurements used to estimate aspects of tinnitus perception appear unrelated to the impact of tinnitus, as assessed by a subjective outcome instrument. These psychoacoustic measurements do not assess reactions to tinnitus. These reactions should be measured by validated questionnaires, such as the TFI, which are designed to measure tinnitus impact. The moderate correlations between the NRS and the TFI suggest that self-reported tinnitus loudness is more a measure of tinnitus reactions than perception.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85065390830&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85065390830&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1044/2018_AJA-TTR17-18-0041

DO - 10.1044/2018_AJA-TTR17-18-0041

M3 - Article

VL - 28

SP - 174

EP - 180

JO - American Journal of Audiology

JF - American Journal of Audiology

SN - 1059-0889

IS - 1

ER -