Perceived risk following melanoma genetic testing: A 2-year prospective study distinguishing subjective estimates from recall

Lisa G. Aspinwall, Jennifer M. Taber, Wendy Kohlmann, Samantha L. Leaf, Sancy A. Leachman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

25 Scopus citations


A major goal of predictive genetic testing is to alert people to their risk before illness onset; however, little is known about how risk perceptions change following genetic testing and whether information is recalled accurately over time. In the United States, a CDKN2A/p16 mutation confers 76 % lifetime risk of melanoma. Following genetic counseling and test reporting, subjective risk estimates and recall of counselor-provided risk estimates were assessed 5 times over the next 2 years among 60 adult members of 2 extended CDKN2A/p16 kindreds. No sustained changes from baseline in risk perceptions were reported. Unaffected carriers (n=15) consistently reported significantly lower subjective risk estimates (46 %) than they were actually given (76 %, p<0.001) or recalled having been given (60 %, p<0.001). Noncarriers' (n=27) risk estimates decreased following results disclosure, but rebounded, with both subjective and recalled estimates subsequently exceeding what they were told by the counselor (both ps<0.001). Affected carriers' (n=18) risk estimates for developing a new melanoma corresponded well to counselor-provided information (p=0.362). For all 3 patient groups, results were consistent across multiple risk measures and remained similar when demographic, phenotypic, and baseline behavioral contributors to melanoma risk were statistically controlled. These findings are consistent with other studies of risk perception, but additional studies of more diverse populations are needed to understand the reasons behind both the persistence of initial risk estimates and their divergence from information provided by the counselor during genetic counseling. Additionally, determining whether holding subjective risk perceptions that differ from counselor-provided information ultimately affects adherence to management recommendations will help guide the presentation of risk information in genetic counseling practice.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)421-437
Number of pages17
JournalJournal of Genetic Counseling
Issue number3
StatePublished - Jun 2014
Externally publishedYes


  • CDKN2A/p16
  • Genetic counseling
  • Genetic testing
  • Melanoma
  • Perceived risk

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Genetics(clinical)


Dive into the research topics of 'Perceived risk following melanoma genetic testing: A 2-year prospective study distinguishing subjective estimates from recall'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this