Perceived predictive value of the Medical Student Performance Evaluation (MSPE) in anesthesiology resident selection

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Study Objective: To study the perceptions of anesthesiology resident program directors about the value of the Medical Student Performance Evaluation (MSPE) in predicting successful residents. Design: Survey instrument. Setting: Anesthesiology department of a university hospital. Measurements: An online survey was sent to 115 U.S. medical school-based anesthesiology residency program directors. Descriptive statistics were used to report which sections of the MSPE were predictive and which were not predictive. More than 30 qualitative comments were hand-coded for frequency and emerging themes. Main Results: Those sections predictive of success included the (a) academic history summary, (b) academic progress, (c) academic ranking, and (d) the candidate's comparative clinical performance. Non-predictive sections included (a) unique characteristics, (b) pre-clinical comparative performance, (c) professional behaviors versus those of classmates, (d) summary statement, and (e) Appendix E. The strongest theme emerging from the qualitative findings was a desire for the MSPE to indicate candidates' rank. Conclusions: Anesthesiology programs tend to rely on the most objective sections of the MSPE. While program directors valued comments from clinical faculty, they did not hold the preclinical performance relative to peers in similar esteem, and there is a lack of reliability in the MSPE's assessment of professional behaviors.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)38-43
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Clinical Anesthesia
Volume21
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 2009

Fingerprint

Anesthesiology
Medical Students
Internship and Residency
Medical Schools
Hand
History
Surveys and Questionnaires

Keywords

  • Anesthesiologists: residents
  • Medical student performance evaluation (MSPE)
  • Residency programs

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine

Cite this

@article{f1c8ba8def15431e87ef0a2f224957bf,
title = "Perceived predictive value of the Medical Student Performance Evaluation (MSPE) in anesthesiology resident selection",
abstract = "Study Objective: To study the perceptions of anesthesiology resident program directors about the value of the Medical Student Performance Evaluation (MSPE) in predicting successful residents. Design: Survey instrument. Setting: Anesthesiology department of a university hospital. Measurements: An online survey was sent to 115 U.S. medical school-based anesthesiology residency program directors. Descriptive statistics were used to report which sections of the MSPE were predictive and which were not predictive. More than 30 qualitative comments were hand-coded for frequency and emerging themes. Main Results: Those sections predictive of success included the (a) academic history summary, (b) academic progress, (c) academic ranking, and (d) the candidate's comparative clinical performance. Non-predictive sections included (a) unique characteristics, (b) pre-clinical comparative performance, (c) professional behaviors versus those of classmates, (d) summary statement, and (e) Appendix E. The strongest theme emerging from the qualitative findings was a desire for the MSPE to indicate candidates' rank. Conclusions: Anesthesiology programs tend to rely on the most objective sections of the MSPE. While program directors valued comments from clinical faculty, they did not hold the preclinical performance relative to peers in similar esteem, and there is a lack of reliability in the MSPE's assessment of professional behaviors.",
keywords = "Anesthesiologists: residents, Medical student performance evaluation (MSPE), Residency programs",
author = "Christopher Swide and Kathie Lasater and Dawn Dillman",
year = "2009",
month = "2",
doi = "10.1016/j.jclinane.2008.06.019",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "21",
pages = "38--43",
journal = "Journal of Clinical Anesthesia",
issn = "0952-8180",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Perceived predictive value of the Medical Student Performance Evaluation (MSPE) in anesthesiology resident selection

AU - Swide, Christopher

AU - Lasater, Kathie

AU - Dillman, Dawn

PY - 2009/2

Y1 - 2009/2

N2 - Study Objective: To study the perceptions of anesthesiology resident program directors about the value of the Medical Student Performance Evaluation (MSPE) in predicting successful residents. Design: Survey instrument. Setting: Anesthesiology department of a university hospital. Measurements: An online survey was sent to 115 U.S. medical school-based anesthesiology residency program directors. Descriptive statistics were used to report which sections of the MSPE were predictive and which were not predictive. More than 30 qualitative comments were hand-coded for frequency and emerging themes. Main Results: Those sections predictive of success included the (a) academic history summary, (b) academic progress, (c) academic ranking, and (d) the candidate's comparative clinical performance. Non-predictive sections included (a) unique characteristics, (b) pre-clinical comparative performance, (c) professional behaviors versus those of classmates, (d) summary statement, and (e) Appendix E. The strongest theme emerging from the qualitative findings was a desire for the MSPE to indicate candidates' rank. Conclusions: Anesthesiology programs tend to rely on the most objective sections of the MSPE. While program directors valued comments from clinical faculty, they did not hold the preclinical performance relative to peers in similar esteem, and there is a lack of reliability in the MSPE's assessment of professional behaviors.

AB - Study Objective: To study the perceptions of anesthesiology resident program directors about the value of the Medical Student Performance Evaluation (MSPE) in predicting successful residents. Design: Survey instrument. Setting: Anesthesiology department of a university hospital. Measurements: An online survey was sent to 115 U.S. medical school-based anesthesiology residency program directors. Descriptive statistics were used to report which sections of the MSPE were predictive and which were not predictive. More than 30 qualitative comments were hand-coded for frequency and emerging themes. Main Results: Those sections predictive of success included the (a) academic history summary, (b) academic progress, (c) academic ranking, and (d) the candidate's comparative clinical performance. Non-predictive sections included (a) unique characteristics, (b) pre-clinical comparative performance, (c) professional behaviors versus those of classmates, (d) summary statement, and (e) Appendix E. The strongest theme emerging from the qualitative findings was a desire for the MSPE to indicate candidates' rank. Conclusions: Anesthesiology programs tend to rely on the most objective sections of the MSPE. While program directors valued comments from clinical faculty, they did not hold the preclinical performance relative to peers in similar esteem, and there is a lack of reliability in the MSPE's assessment of professional behaviors.

KW - Anesthesiologists: residents

KW - Medical student performance evaluation (MSPE)

KW - Residency programs

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=60049085294&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=60049085294&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jclinane.2008.06.019

DO - 10.1016/j.jclinane.2008.06.019

M3 - Article

C2 - 19232939

AN - SCOPUS:60049085294

VL - 21

SP - 38

EP - 43

JO - Journal of Clinical Anesthesia

JF - Journal of Clinical Anesthesia

SN - 0952-8180

IS - 1

ER -