Pegylated interferons for chronic hepatitis C virus infection

An indirect analysis of randomized trials

Roger Chou, S. Carson, B. K S Chan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Dual therapy with pegylated interferon and ribavirin is recommended for patients with chronic hepatitis C virus infection who meet criteria for treatment, but it is unclear whether pegylated interferon alfa-2a or pegylated interferon alfa-2b is more effective or associated with fewer adverse events. Because data from head-to-head trials of pegylated interferon regimens are sparse, we performed adjusted indirect analysis using trials comparing dual therapy with pegylated interferon alfa-2a or pegylated interferon alfa-2b vs dual therapy with non-pegylated interferon. We searched for potentially relevant randomized controlled trials using electronic databases and reference lists. A total of 16 trials met inclusion criteria. Adjusted indirect comparisons found no statistically significant differences between dual therapy with pegylated interferon alfa-2a and dual therapy with pegylated interferon alfa-2b on the outcomes sustained virologic response [relative risk (RR) = 1.59, 95% CI: 0.56-4.46], withdrawal due to adverse events (RR = 0.86, 95% CI: 0.29-2.55), anaemia (RR = 1.67, 95% CI: 0.32-8.84), depression (RR = 1.09, 95% CI: 0.41-2.90) or flu-like symptoms (RR = 1.10, 95% CI: 0.53-2.29). Adjusting for potential publication bias and stratifying analyses by indicators of methodological quality, human immunodeficiency virus infection status, hepatitis C virus genotype, dose of ribavirin or dose of pegylated interferon did not change conclusions. There is insufficient evidence to support conclusions that dual therapy with one pegylated interferon is superior to the other. However, because estimates are imprecise, our results also do not rule out a clinically significant difference. Head-to-head trials are needed to verify the results of indirect analyses and provide additional guidance on optimal treatment choices.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)551-570
Number of pages20
JournalJournal of Viral Hepatitis
Volume15
Issue number8
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 2008

Fingerprint

Chronic Hepatitis C
Virus Diseases
Hepacivirus
Interferons
Ribavirin
Therapeutics
Publication Bias
Anemia
Randomized Controlled Trials
Genotype
HIV
Databases
peginterferon alfa-2a
peginterferon alfa-2b

Keywords

  • Antiviral agents
  • Hepatitis c virus
  • Interferon alfa- 2a
  • Interferon alfa-2b
  • Meta-analysis

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Hepatology
  • Infectious Diseases
  • Virology

Cite this

Pegylated interferons for chronic hepatitis C virus infection : An indirect analysis of randomized trials. / Chou, Roger; Carson, S.; Chan, B. K S.

In: Journal of Viral Hepatitis, Vol. 15, No. 8, 08.2008, p. 551-570.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{d819c927116a46589037cf76dbee613f,
title = "Pegylated interferons for chronic hepatitis C virus infection: An indirect analysis of randomized trials",
abstract = "Dual therapy with pegylated interferon and ribavirin is recommended for patients with chronic hepatitis C virus infection who meet criteria for treatment, but it is unclear whether pegylated interferon alfa-2a or pegylated interferon alfa-2b is more effective or associated with fewer adverse events. Because data from head-to-head trials of pegylated interferon regimens are sparse, we performed adjusted indirect analysis using trials comparing dual therapy with pegylated interferon alfa-2a or pegylated interferon alfa-2b vs dual therapy with non-pegylated interferon. We searched for potentially relevant randomized controlled trials using electronic databases and reference lists. A total of 16 trials met inclusion criteria. Adjusted indirect comparisons found no statistically significant differences between dual therapy with pegylated interferon alfa-2a and dual therapy with pegylated interferon alfa-2b on the outcomes sustained virologic response [relative risk (RR) = 1.59, 95{\%} CI: 0.56-4.46], withdrawal due to adverse events (RR = 0.86, 95{\%} CI: 0.29-2.55), anaemia (RR = 1.67, 95{\%} CI: 0.32-8.84), depression (RR = 1.09, 95{\%} CI: 0.41-2.90) or flu-like symptoms (RR = 1.10, 95{\%} CI: 0.53-2.29). Adjusting for potential publication bias and stratifying analyses by indicators of methodological quality, human immunodeficiency virus infection status, hepatitis C virus genotype, dose of ribavirin or dose of pegylated interferon did not change conclusions. There is insufficient evidence to support conclusions that dual therapy with one pegylated interferon is superior to the other. However, because estimates are imprecise, our results also do not rule out a clinically significant difference. Head-to-head trials are needed to verify the results of indirect analyses and provide additional guidance on optimal treatment choices.",
keywords = "Antiviral agents, Hepatitis c virus, Interferon alfa- 2a, Interferon alfa-2b, Meta-analysis",
author = "Roger Chou and S. Carson and Chan, {B. K S}",
year = "2008",
month = "8",
doi = "10.1111/j.1365-2893.2008.00984.x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "15",
pages = "551--570",
journal = "Journal of Viral Hepatitis",
issn = "1352-0504",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "8",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Pegylated interferons for chronic hepatitis C virus infection

T2 - An indirect analysis of randomized trials

AU - Chou, Roger

AU - Carson, S.

AU - Chan, B. K S

PY - 2008/8

Y1 - 2008/8

N2 - Dual therapy with pegylated interferon and ribavirin is recommended for patients with chronic hepatitis C virus infection who meet criteria for treatment, but it is unclear whether pegylated interferon alfa-2a or pegylated interferon alfa-2b is more effective or associated with fewer adverse events. Because data from head-to-head trials of pegylated interferon regimens are sparse, we performed adjusted indirect analysis using trials comparing dual therapy with pegylated interferon alfa-2a or pegylated interferon alfa-2b vs dual therapy with non-pegylated interferon. We searched for potentially relevant randomized controlled trials using electronic databases and reference lists. A total of 16 trials met inclusion criteria. Adjusted indirect comparisons found no statistically significant differences between dual therapy with pegylated interferon alfa-2a and dual therapy with pegylated interferon alfa-2b on the outcomes sustained virologic response [relative risk (RR) = 1.59, 95% CI: 0.56-4.46], withdrawal due to adverse events (RR = 0.86, 95% CI: 0.29-2.55), anaemia (RR = 1.67, 95% CI: 0.32-8.84), depression (RR = 1.09, 95% CI: 0.41-2.90) or flu-like symptoms (RR = 1.10, 95% CI: 0.53-2.29). Adjusting for potential publication bias and stratifying analyses by indicators of methodological quality, human immunodeficiency virus infection status, hepatitis C virus genotype, dose of ribavirin or dose of pegylated interferon did not change conclusions. There is insufficient evidence to support conclusions that dual therapy with one pegylated interferon is superior to the other. However, because estimates are imprecise, our results also do not rule out a clinically significant difference. Head-to-head trials are needed to verify the results of indirect analyses and provide additional guidance on optimal treatment choices.

AB - Dual therapy with pegylated interferon and ribavirin is recommended for patients with chronic hepatitis C virus infection who meet criteria for treatment, but it is unclear whether pegylated interferon alfa-2a or pegylated interferon alfa-2b is more effective or associated with fewer adverse events. Because data from head-to-head trials of pegylated interferon regimens are sparse, we performed adjusted indirect analysis using trials comparing dual therapy with pegylated interferon alfa-2a or pegylated interferon alfa-2b vs dual therapy with non-pegylated interferon. We searched for potentially relevant randomized controlled trials using electronic databases and reference lists. A total of 16 trials met inclusion criteria. Adjusted indirect comparisons found no statistically significant differences between dual therapy with pegylated interferon alfa-2a and dual therapy with pegylated interferon alfa-2b on the outcomes sustained virologic response [relative risk (RR) = 1.59, 95% CI: 0.56-4.46], withdrawal due to adverse events (RR = 0.86, 95% CI: 0.29-2.55), anaemia (RR = 1.67, 95% CI: 0.32-8.84), depression (RR = 1.09, 95% CI: 0.41-2.90) or flu-like symptoms (RR = 1.10, 95% CI: 0.53-2.29). Adjusting for potential publication bias and stratifying analyses by indicators of methodological quality, human immunodeficiency virus infection status, hepatitis C virus genotype, dose of ribavirin or dose of pegylated interferon did not change conclusions. There is insufficient evidence to support conclusions that dual therapy with one pegylated interferon is superior to the other. However, because estimates are imprecise, our results also do not rule out a clinically significant difference. Head-to-head trials are needed to verify the results of indirect analyses and provide additional guidance on optimal treatment choices.

KW - Antiviral agents

KW - Hepatitis c virus

KW - Interferon alfa- 2a

KW - Interferon alfa-2b

KW - Meta-analysis

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=63549116894&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=63549116894&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1365-2893.2008.00984.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1365-2893.2008.00984.x

M3 - Article

VL - 15

SP - 551

EP - 570

JO - Journal of Viral Hepatitis

JF - Journal of Viral Hepatitis

SN - 1352-0504

IS - 8

ER -