Peer review

evidence-based or sacred cow?

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)
Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)275
Number of pages1
JournalNursing Research
Volume51
Issue number5
StatePublished - Sep 2002
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Research Peer Review
Peer Review

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Nursing(all)

Cite this

Peer review : evidence-based or sacred cow? / Tilden, Virginia.

In: Nursing Research, Vol. 51, No. 5, 09.2002, p. 275.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{1fae1f2e4ba84f6381091fdf5a821d55,
title = "Peer review: evidence-based or sacred cow?",
author = "Virginia Tilden",
year = "2002",
month = "9",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "51",
pages = "275",
journal = "Nursing Research",
issn = "0029-6562",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Peer review

T2 - evidence-based or sacred cow?

AU - Tilden, Virginia

PY - 2002/9

Y1 - 2002/9

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0036729195&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0036729195&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 51

SP - 275

JO - Nursing Research

JF - Nursing Research

SN - 0029-6562

IS - 5

ER -