Payment reform in the patient-centered medical home: Enabling and sustaining integrated behavioral health care

Benjamin F. Miller, Kaile M. Ross, Melinda Davis, Stephen P. Melek, Roger Kathol, Patrick Gordon

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

30 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The patient-centered medical home (PCMH) is a promising framework for the redesign of primary care and more recently specialty care. As defined by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, the PCMH framework has 5 attributes: comprehensive care, patient-centered care, coordinated care, accessible services, and quality and safety. Evidence increasingly demonstrates that for the PCMH to best achieve the Triple Aim (improved outcomes, decreased cost, and enhanced patient experience), treatment for behavioral health (including mental health, substance use, and life stressors) must be integrated as a central tenet. However, challenges to implementing the PCMH framework are compounded for real-world practitioners because payment reform rarely happens concurrently. Nowhere is this more evident than in attempts to integrate behavioral health clinicians into primary care. As behavioral health clinicians find opportunities to work in integrated settings, a comprehensive understanding of payment models is integral to the dialogue. This article describes alternatives to the traditional fee for service (FFS) model, including modified FFS, pay for performance, bundled payments, and global payments (i.e., capitation). We suggest that global payment structures provide the best fit to enable and sustain integrated behavioral health clinicians in ways that align with the Triple Aim. Finally, we present recommendations that offer specific, actionable steps to achieve payment reform, complement PCMH, and support integration efforts through policy.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)55-68
Number of pages14
JournalAmerican Psychologist
Volume72
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2017

Fingerprint

Patient-Centered Care
Delivery of Health Care
Fee-for-Service Plans
Health
Primary Health Care
Incentive Reimbursement
Health Services Research
Healthcare
Mental Health
Safety
Costs and Cost Analysis
Clinicians

Keywords

  • Health policy
  • Integrated care
  • Patient-centered medical home
  • Payment reform
  • Primary care

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)
  • Psychology(all)

Cite this

Payment reform in the patient-centered medical home : Enabling and sustaining integrated behavioral health care. / Miller, Benjamin F.; Ross, Kaile M.; Davis, Melinda; Melek, Stephen P.; Kathol, Roger; Gordon, Patrick.

In: American Psychologist, Vol. 72, No. 1, 01.01.2017, p. 55-68.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Miller, Benjamin F. ; Ross, Kaile M. ; Davis, Melinda ; Melek, Stephen P. ; Kathol, Roger ; Gordon, Patrick. / Payment reform in the patient-centered medical home : Enabling and sustaining integrated behavioral health care. In: American Psychologist. 2017 ; Vol. 72, No. 1. pp. 55-68.
@article{6832eea38b7542389ca5e82bae07a42b,
title = "Payment reform in the patient-centered medical home: Enabling and sustaining integrated behavioral health care",
abstract = "The patient-centered medical home (PCMH) is a promising framework for the redesign of primary care and more recently specialty care. As defined by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, the PCMH framework has 5 attributes: comprehensive care, patient-centered care, coordinated care, accessible services, and quality and safety. Evidence increasingly demonstrates that for the PCMH to best achieve the Triple Aim (improved outcomes, decreased cost, and enhanced patient experience), treatment for behavioral health (including mental health, substance use, and life stressors) must be integrated as a central tenet. However, challenges to implementing the PCMH framework are compounded for real-world practitioners because payment reform rarely happens concurrently. Nowhere is this more evident than in attempts to integrate behavioral health clinicians into primary care. As behavioral health clinicians find opportunities to work in integrated settings, a comprehensive understanding of payment models is integral to the dialogue. This article describes alternatives to the traditional fee for service (FFS) model, including modified FFS, pay for performance, bundled payments, and global payments (i.e., capitation). We suggest that global payment structures provide the best fit to enable and sustain integrated behavioral health clinicians in ways that align with the Triple Aim. Finally, we present recommendations that offer specific, actionable steps to achieve payment reform, complement PCMH, and support integration efforts through policy.",
keywords = "Health policy, Integrated care, Patient-centered medical home, Payment reform, Primary care",
author = "Miller, {Benjamin F.} and Ross, {Kaile M.} and Melinda Davis and Melek, {Stephen P.} and Roger Kathol and Patrick Gordon",
year = "2017",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1037/a0040448",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "72",
pages = "55--68",
journal = "American Psychologist",
issn = "0003-066X",
publisher = "American Psychological Association Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Payment reform in the patient-centered medical home

T2 - Enabling and sustaining integrated behavioral health care

AU - Miller, Benjamin F.

AU - Ross, Kaile M.

AU - Davis, Melinda

AU - Melek, Stephen P.

AU - Kathol, Roger

AU - Gordon, Patrick

PY - 2017/1/1

Y1 - 2017/1/1

N2 - The patient-centered medical home (PCMH) is a promising framework for the redesign of primary care and more recently specialty care. As defined by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, the PCMH framework has 5 attributes: comprehensive care, patient-centered care, coordinated care, accessible services, and quality and safety. Evidence increasingly demonstrates that for the PCMH to best achieve the Triple Aim (improved outcomes, decreased cost, and enhanced patient experience), treatment for behavioral health (including mental health, substance use, and life stressors) must be integrated as a central tenet. However, challenges to implementing the PCMH framework are compounded for real-world practitioners because payment reform rarely happens concurrently. Nowhere is this more evident than in attempts to integrate behavioral health clinicians into primary care. As behavioral health clinicians find opportunities to work in integrated settings, a comprehensive understanding of payment models is integral to the dialogue. This article describes alternatives to the traditional fee for service (FFS) model, including modified FFS, pay for performance, bundled payments, and global payments (i.e., capitation). We suggest that global payment structures provide the best fit to enable and sustain integrated behavioral health clinicians in ways that align with the Triple Aim. Finally, we present recommendations that offer specific, actionable steps to achieve payment reform, complement PCMH, and support integration efforts through policy.

AB - The patient-centered medical home (PCMH) is a promising framework for the redesign of primary care and more recently specialty care. As defined by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, the PCMH framework has 5 attributes: comprehensive care, patient-centered care, coordinated care, accessible services, and quality and safety. Evidence increasingly demonstrates that for the PCMH to best achieve the Triple Aim (improved outcomes, decreased cost, and enhanced patient experience), treatment for behavioral health (including mental health, substance use, and life stressors) must be integrated as a central tenet. However, challenges to implementing the PCMH framework are compounded for real-world practitioners because payment reform rarely happens concurrently. Nowhere is this more evident than in attempts to integrate behavioral health clinicians into primary care. As behavioral health clinicians find opportunities to work in integrated settings, a comprehensive understanding of payment models is integral to the dialogue. This article describes alternatives to the traditional fee for service (FFS) model, including modified FFS, pay for performance, bundled payments, and global payments (i.e., capitation). We suggest that global payment structures provide the best fit to enable and sustain integrated behavioral health clinicians in ways that align with the Triple Aim. Finally, we present recommendations that offer specific, actionable steps to achieve payment reform, complement PCMH, and support integration efforts through policy.

KW - Health policy

KW - Integrated care

KW - Patient-centered medical home

KW - Payment reform

KW - Primary care

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85008709517&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85008709517&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1037/a0040448

DO - 10.1037/a0040448

M3 - Article

C2 - 28068138

AN - SCOPUS:85008709517

VL - 72

SP - 55

EP - 68

JO - American Psychologist

JF - American Psychologist

SN - 0003-066X

IS - 1

ER -