Patients who initially refuse prehospital evaluation and/or therapy

Geraldine Stark, Jerris R. Hedges, Keith Neely, Robert Norton

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

42 Scopus citations

Abstract

The authors performed a retrospective descriptive and analytical cohort study of prehospital patient initial refusal of care (PIRC) cases to characterize the types of patients encountered and to assess factors associated with their dispositions. During a 6-month period, 169 of 1715 (9.9%) base station calls in an urban emergency medical service (EMS) system were for physician involvement in a PIRC. Patients' dispositions were as follows: left at scene against medical advice (53%); taken by ambulance to the hospital (28%); left with friend (13%); other disposition (5%). While police were called to the scene 41 times, they placed a "legal hold" on only 10 patients. Leaving the patient at the scene against medical advice was associated (logistic regression analysis; P <.05) with the absence of the following factors: family on the scene and a police hold, and with the presence of the following factors: treated hypoglycemia, alcohol use, orlentation, and normal speech. The development of statutes that allow police hold placement under the guidance of the base station physician may be necessary. Such statutes would aid transportation of a patient considered by EMS personnel to have impaired mental capacity that may limit the patient's ability to understand medical care decisions.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)509-511
Number of pages3
JournalAmerican Journal of Emergency Medicine
Volume8
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1990

    Fingerprint

Keywords

  • Emergency medical services (EMS) Systems
  • legal hold
  • medical legal
  • mental capacity
  • prehospital care
  • refusal of medical care

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Emergency Medicine

Cite this