Patients who initially refuse prehospital evaluation and/or therapy

Geraldine Stark, Jerris R. Hedges, Keith Neely, Robert Norton

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

42 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The authors performed a retrospective descriptive and analytical cohort study of prehospital patient initial refusal of care (PIRC) cases to characterize the types of patients encountered and to assess factors associated with their dispositions. During a 6-month period, 169 of 1715 (9.9%) base station calls in an urban emergency medical service (EMS) system were for physician involvement in a PIRC. Patients' dispositions were as follows: left at scene against medical advice (53%); taken by ambulance to the hospital (28%); left with friend (13%); other disposition (5%). While police were called to the scene 41 times, they placed a "legal hold" on only 10 patients. Leaving the patient at the scene against medical advice was associated (logistic regression analysis; P <.05) with the absence of the following factors: family on the scene and a police hold, and with the presence of the following factors: treated hypoglycemia, alcohol use, orlentation, and normal speech. The development of statutes that allow police hold placement under the guidance of the base station physician may be necessary. Such statutes would aid transportation of a patient considered by EMS personnel to have impaired mental capacity that may limit the patient's ability to understand medical care decisions.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)509-511
Number of pages3
JournalAmerican Journal of Emergency Medicine
Volume8
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - 1990

Fingerprint

Police
Emergency Medical Services
Therapeutics
Transportation of Patients
Physicians
Aptitude
Ambulances
Hypoglycemia
Cohort Studies
Logistic Models
Regression Analysis
Alcohols

Keywords

  • Emergency medical services (EMS) Systems
  • legal hold
  • medical legal
  • mental capacity
  • prehospital care
  • refusal of medical care

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Emergency Medicine

Cite this

Patients who initially refuse prehospital evaluation and/or therapy. / Stark, Geraldine; Hedges, Jerris R.; Neely, Keith; Norton, Robert.

In: American Journal of Emergency Medicine, Vol. 8, No. 6, 1990, p. 509-511.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Stark, Geraldine ; Hedges, Jerris R. ; Neely, Keith ; Norton, Robert. / Patients who initially refuse prehospital evaluation and/or therapy. In: American Journal of Emergency Medicine. 1990 ; Vol. 8, No. 6. pp. 509-511.
@article{95bd8b106b4b41008a97a4e0ce18a835,
title = "Patients who initially refuse prehospital evaluation and/or therapy",
abstract = "The authors performed a retrospective descriptive and analytical cohort study of prehospital patient initial refusal of care (PIRC) cases to characterize the types of patients encountered and to assess factors associated with their dispositions. During a 6-month period, 169 of 1715 (9.9{\%}) base station calls in an urban emergency medical service (EMS) system were for physician involvement in a PIRC. Patients' dispositions were as follows: left at scene against medical advice (53{\%}); taken by ambulance to the hospital (28{\%}); left with friend (13{\%}); other disposition (5{\%}). While police were called to the scene 41 times, they placed a {"}legal hold{"} on only 10 patients. Leaving the patient at the scene against medical advice was associated (logistic regression analysis; P <.05) with the absence of the following factors: family on the scene and a police hold, and with the presence of the following factors: treated hypoglycemia, alcohol use, orlentation, and normal speech. The development of statutes that allow police hold placement under the guidance of the base station physician may be necessary. Such statutes would aid transportation of a patient considered by EMS personnel to have impaired mental capacity that may limit the patient's ability to understand medical care decisions.",
keywords = "Emergency medical services (EMS) Systems, legal hold, medical legal, mental capacity, prehospital care, refusal of medical care",
author = "Geraldine Stark and Hedges, {Jerris R.} and Keith Neely and Robert Norton",
year = "1990",
doi = "10.1016/0735-6757(90)90152-P",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "8",
pages = "509--511",
journal = "American Journal of Emergency Medicine",
issn = "0735-6757",
publisher = "W.B. Saunders Ltd",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Patients who initially refuse prehospital evaluation and/or therapy

AU - Stark, Geraldine

AU - Hedges, Jerris R.

AU - Neely, Keith

AU - Norton, Robert

PY - 1990

Y1 - 1990

N2 - The authors performed a retrospective descriptive and analytical cohort study of prehospital patient initial refusal of care (PIRC) cases to characterize the types of patients encountered and to assess factors associated with their dispositions. During a 6-month period, 169 of 1715 (9.9%) base station calls in an urban emergency medical service (EMS) system were for physician involvement in a PIRC. Patients' dispositions were as follows: left at scene against medical advice (53%); taken by ambulance to the hospital (28%); left with friend (13%); other disposition (5%). While police were called to the scene 41 times, they placed a "legal hold" on only 10 patients. Leaving the patient at the scene against medical advice was associated (logistic regression analysis; P <.05) with the absence of the following factors: family on the scene and a police hold, and with the presence of the following factors: treated hypoglycemia, alcohol use, orlentation, and normal speech. The development of statutes that allow police hold placement under the guidance of the base station physician may be necessary. Such statutes would aid transportation of a patient considered by EMS personnel to have impaired mental capacity that may limit the patient's ability to understand medical care decisions.

AB - The authors performed a retrospective descriptive and analytical cohort study of prehospital patient initial refusal of care (PIRC) cases to characterize the types of patients encountered and to assess factors associated with their dispositions. During a 6-month period, 169 of 1715 (9.9%) base station calls in an urban emergency medical service (EMS) system were for physician involvement in a PIRC. Patients' dispositions were as follows: left at scene against medical advice (53%); taken by ambulance to the hospital (28%); left with friend (13%); other disposition (5%). While police were called to the scene 41 times, they placed a "legal hold" on only 10 patients. Leaving the patient at the scene against medical advice was associated (logistic regression analysis; P <.05) with the absence of the following factors: family on the scene and a police hold, and with the presence of the following factors: treated hypoglycemia, alcohol use, orlentation, and normal speech. The development of statutes that allow police hold placement under the guidance of the base station physician may be necessary. Such statutes would aid transportation of a patient considered by EMS personnel to have impaired mental capacity that may limit the patient's ability to understand medical care decisions.

KW - Emergency medical services (EMS) Systems

KW - legal hold

KW - medical legal

KW - mental capacity

KW - prehospital care

KW - refusal of medical care

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0025226549&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0025226549&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/0735-6757(90)90152-P

DO - 10.1016/0735-6757(90)90152-P

M3 - Article

VL - 8

SP - 509

EP - 511

JO - American Journal of Emergency Medicine

JF - American Journal of Emergency Medicine

SN - 0735-6757

IS - 6

ER -