Patients were more consistent in randomized trial at prioritizing childbirth preferences using graphic-numeric than verbal formats

Karen Eden, James G. Dolan, Nancy A. Perrin, Dundar Kocaoglu, Nicholas Anderson, James Case, Jeanne-Marie Guise

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

15 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: We developed an evidence-based decision aid to help women with a prior cesarean to prioritize their childbirth preferences related to a future birth. Because there was uncertainty about which scale format would assist the patients in being most consistent in prioritizing preferences in a multiattribute decision model, we compared a graphic-numeric scale with a text-anchored scale. Study Design and Setting: Ninety-six postnatal women with a prior cesarean were randomized to use 1 of 2 preference scale formats in a computerized childbirth decision aid. We measured the level of inconsistency (intransitivity) when patients prioritized their childbirth preferences and clarity of values before and after using the decision aid. Results: When the trade-offs involved risk, women were more consistent when using graphic-numeric than text-anchored formats (P = 0.015). They prioritized safety to their baby as 4 times more important than any other decision factor including safety to self. Both groups reduced unclear childbirth values over time (P <0.001). Women who over-used the extreme ends of the scale when evaluating risk were more likely to be inconsistent (P <0.001). Conclusion: Patients were more consistent in making trade-offs involving risk using graphic-numeric formats than text-anchored formats to measure patient preferences.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalJournal of Clinical Epidemiology
Volume62
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 2009

Fingerprint

Parturition
Decision Support Techniques
Safety
Patient Preference
Uncertainty

Keywords

  • Analytic hierarchy process
  • Decision aid
  • Decision support techniques
  • Patient preferences
  • Pregnancy
  • Vaginal birth after cesarean

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Epidemiology

Cite this

Patients were more consistent in randomized trial at prioritizing childbirth preferences using graphic-numeric than verbal formats. / Eden, Karen; Dolan, James G.; Perrin, Nancy A.; Kocaoglu, Dundar; Anderson, Nicholas; Case, James; Guise, Jeanne-Marie.

In: Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, Vol. 62, No. 4, 04.2009.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{5fc518e329d54a7fb077484e03eba30e,
title = "Patients were more consistent in randomized trial at prioritizing childbirth preferences using graphic-numeric than verbal formats",
abstract = "Objective: We developed an evidence-based decision aid to help women with a prior cesarean to prioritize their childbirth preferences related to a future birth. Because there was uncertainty about which scale format would assist the patients in being most consistent in prioritizing preferences in a multiattribute decision model, we compared a graphic-numeric scale with a text-anchored scale. Study Design and Setting: Ninety-six postnatal women with a prior cesarean were randomized to use 1 of 2 preference scale formats in a computerized childbirth decision aid. We measured the level of inconsistency (intransitivity) when patients prioritized their childbirth preferences and clarity of values before and after using the decision aid. Results: When the trade-offs involved risk, women were more consistent when using graphic-numeric than text-anchored formats (P = 0.015). They prioritized safety to their baby as 4 times more important than any other decision factor including safety to self. Both groups reduced unclear childbirth values over time (P <0.001). Women who over-used the extreme ends of the scale when evaluating risk were more likely to be inconsistent (P <0.001). Conclusion: Patients were more consistent in making trade-offs involving risk using graphic-numeric formats than text-anchored formats to measure patient preferences.",
keywords = "Analytic hierarchy process, Decision aid, Decision support techniques, Patient preferences, Pregnancy, Vaginal birth after cesarean",
author = "Karen Eden and Dolan, {James G.} and Perrin, {Nancy A.} and Dundar Kocaoglu and Nicholas Anderson and James Case and Jeanne-Marie Guise",
year = "2009",
month = "4",
doi = "10.1016/j.jclinepi.2008.05.012",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "62",
journal = "Journal of Clinical Epidemiology",
issn = "0895-4356",
publisher = "Elsevier USA",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Patients were more consistent in randomized trial at prioritizing childbirth preferences using graphic-numeric than verbal formats

AU - Eden, Karen

AU - Dolan, James G.

AU - Perrin, Nancy A.

AU - Kocaoglu, Dundar

AU - Anderson, Nicholas

AU - Case, James

AU - Guise, Jeanne-Marie

PY - 2009/4

Y1 - 2009/4

N2 - Objective: We developed an evidence-based decision aid to help women with a prior cesarean to prioritize their childbirth preferences related to a future birth. Because there was uncertainty about which scale format would assist the patients in being most consistent in prioritizing preferences in a multiattribute decision model, we compared a graphic-numeric scale with a text-anchored scale. Study Design and Setting: Ninety-six postnatal women with a prior cesarean were randomized to use 1 of 2 preference scale formats in a computerized childbirth decision aid. We measured the level of inconsistency (intransitivity) when patients prioritized their childbirth preferences and clarity of values before and after using the decision aid. Results: When the trade-offs involved risk, women were more consistent when using graphic-numeric than text-anchored formats (P = 0.015). They prioritized safety to their baby as 4 times more important than any other decision factor including safety to self. Both groups reduced unclear childbirth values over time (P <0.001). Women who over-used the extreme ends of the scale when evaluating risk were more likely to be inconsistent (P <0.001). Conclusion: Patients were more consistent in making trade-offs involving risk using graphic-numeric formats than text-anchored formats to measure patient preferences.

AB - Objective: We developed an evidence-based decision aid to help women with a prior cesarean to prioritize their childbirth preferences related to a future birth. Because there was uncertainty about which scale format would assist the patients in being most consistent in prioritizing preferences in a multiattribute decision model, we compared a graphic-numeric scale with a text-anchored scale. Study Design and Setting: Ninety-six postnatal women with a prior cesarean were randomized to use 1 of 2 preference scale formats in a computerized childbirth decision aid. We measured the level of inconsistency (intransitivity) when patients prioritized their childbirth preferences and clarity of values before and after using the decision aid. Results: When the trade-offs involved risk, women were more consistent when using graphic-numeric than text-anchored formats (P = 0.015). They prioritized safety to their baby as 4 times more important than any other decision factor including safety to self. Both groups reduced unclear childbirth values over time (P <0.001). Women who over-used the extreme ends of the scale when evaluating risk were more likely to be inconsistent (P <0.001). Conclusion: Patients were more consistent in making trade-offs involving risk using graphic-numeric formats than text-anchored formats to measure patient preferences.

KW - Analytic hierarchy process

KW - Decision aid

KW - Decision support techniques

KW - Patient preferences

KW - Pregnancy

KW - Vaginal birth after cesarean

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=60549115780&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=60549115780&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2008.05.012

DO - 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2008.05.012

M3 - Article

VL - 62

JO - Journal of Clinical Epidemiology

JF - Journal of Clinical Epidemiology

SN - 0895-4356

IS - 4

ER -