Patient-physician colorectal cancer screening discussion content and patients' use of colorectal cancer screening

Jennifer Elston Lafata, Greg Cooper, George Divine, Nancy Oja-Tebbe, Sue Flocke

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

16 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: The US Preventive Services Task Force recommends using the 5As (i.e., Assess, Advise, Agree, Assist and Arrange) when discussing preventive services. We evaluate the association of the 5As discussion during primary care office visits with patients' subsequent colorectal cancer (CRC) screening use. Methods: Audio-recordings of n= 443 periodic health exams among insured patients aged 50-80 years and due for CRC screening were joined with pre-visit patient surveys and screening use data from an electronic medical record. Association of the 5As with CRC screening was assessed using generalized estimating equations. Results: 93% of patients received a recommendation for screening (Advise) and 53% were screened in the following year. The likelihood of screening increased as the number of 5A steps increased: compared to patients whose visit contained no 5A step, those whose visit contained 1-2 steps (OR = 2.96 [95% CI 1.16, 7.53]) and 3 or more steps (4.98 [95% CI 1.84, 13.44]) were significantly more likely to use screening. Conclusions: Physician CRC screening recommendations that include recommended 5A steps are associated with increased patient adherence. Practice implications: A CRC screening recommendation (Advise) that also describes patient eligibility (Assess) and provides help to obtain screening (Assist) may lead to improved adherence to CRC screening.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)76-82
Number of pages7
JournalPatient Education and Counseling
Volume94
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2014
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Early Detection of Cancer
Colorectal Neoplasms
Physicians
Office Visits
Electronic Health Records
Advisory Committees
Patient Compliance
Primary Health Care
Health

Keywords

  • Colorectal cancer screening
  • Decision making
  • Patient-physician communication

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Patient-physician colorectal cancer screening discussion content and patients' use of colorectal cancer screening. / Lafata, Jennifer Elston; Cooper, Greg; Divine, George; Oja-Tebbe, Nancy; Flocke, Sue.

In: Patient Education and Counseling, Vol. 94, No. 1, 01.01.2014, p. 76-82.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Lafata, Jennifer Elston ; Cooper, Greg ; Divine, George ; Oja-Tebbe, Nancy ; Flocke, Sue. / Patient-physician colorectal cancer screening discussion content and patients' use of colorectal cancer screening. In: Patient Education and Counseling. 2014 ; Vol. 94, No. 1. pp. 76-82.
@article{6b93c68eba1544a1af18464a8f6c80f4,
title = "Patient-physician colorectal cancer screening discussion content and patients' use of colorectal cancer screening",
abstract = "Objective: The US Preventive Services Task Force recommends using the 5As (i.e., Assess, Advise, Agree, Assist and Arrange) when discussing preventive services. We evaluate the association of the 5As discussion during primary care office visits with patients' subsequent colorectal cancer (CRC) screening use. Methods: Audio-recordings of n= 443 periodic health exams among insured patients aged 50-80 years and due for CRC screening were joined with pre-visit patient surveys and screening use data from an electronic medical record. Association of the 5As with CRC screening was assessed using generalized estimating equations. Results: 93{\%} of patients received a recommendation for screening (Advise) and 53{\%} were screened in the following year. The likelihood of screening increased as the number of 5A steps increased: compared to patients whose visit contained no 5A step, those whose visit contained 1-2 steps (OR = 2.96 [95{\%} CI 1.16, 7.53]) and 3 or more steps (4.98 [95{\%} CI 1.84, 13.44]) were significantly more likely to use screening. Conclusions: Physician CRC screening recommendations that include recommended 5A steps are associated with increased patient adherence. Practice implications: A CRC screening recommendation (Advise) that also describes patient eligibility (Assess) and provides help to obtain screening (Assist) may lead to improved adherence to CRC screening.",
keywords = "Colorectal cancer screening, Decision making, Patient-physician communication",
author = "Lafata, {Jennifer Elston} and Greg Cooper and George Divine and Nancy Oja-Tebbe and Sue Flocke",
year = "2014",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.pec.2013.09.008",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "94",
pages = "76--82",
journal = "Patient Education and Counseling",
issn = "0738-3991",
publisher = "Elsevier Ireland Ltd",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Patient-physician colorectal cancer screening discussion content and patients' use of colorectal cancer screening

AU - Lafata, Jennifer Elston

AU - Cooper, Greg

AU - Divine, George

AU - Oja-Tebbe, Nancy

AU - Flocke, Sue

PY - 2014/1/1

Y1 - 2014/1/1

N2 - Objective: The US Preventive Services Task Force recommends using the 5As (i.e., Assess, Advise, Agree, Assist and Arrange) when discussing preventive services. We evaluate the association of the 5As discussion during primary care office visits with patients' subsequent colorectal cancer (CRC) screening use. Methods: Audio-recordings of n= 443 periodic health exams among insured patients aged 50-80 years and due for CRC screening were joined with pre-visit patient surveys and screening use data from an electronic medical record. Association of the 5As with CRC screening was assessed using generalized estimating equations. Results: 93% of patients received a recommendation for screening (Advise) and 53% were screened in the following year. The likelihood of screening increased as the number of 5A steps increased: compared to patients whose visit contained no 5A step, those whose visit contained 1-2 steps (OR = 2.96 [95% CI 1.16, 7.53]) and 3 or more steps (4.98 [95% CI 1.84, 13.44]) were significantly more likely to use screening. Conclusions: Physician CRC screening recommendations that include recommended 5A steps are associated with increased patient adherence. Practice implications: A CRC screening recommendation (Advise) that also describes patient eligibility (Assess) and provides help to obtain screening (Assist) may lead to improved adherence to CRC screening.

AB - Objective: The US Preventive Services Task Force recommends using the 5As (i.e., Assess, Advise, Agree, Assist and Arrange) when discussing preventive services. We evaluate the association of the 5As discussion during primary care office visits with patients' subsequent colorectal cancer (CRC) screening use. Methods: Audio-recordings of n= 443 periodic health exams among insured patients aged 50-80 years and due for CRC screening were joined with pre-visit patient surveys and screening use data from an electronic medical record. Association of the 5As with CRC screening was assessed using generalized estimating equations. Results: 93% of patients received a recommendation for screening (Advise) and 53% were screened in the following year. The likelihood of screening increased as the number of 5A steps increased: compared to patients whose visit contained no 5A step, those whose visit contained 1-2 steps (OR = 2.96 [95% CI 1.16, 7.53]) and 3 or more steps (4.98 [95% CI 1.84, 13.44]) were significantly more likely to use screening. Conclusions: Physician CRC screening recommendations that include recommended 5A steps are associated with increased patient adherence. Practice implications: A CRC screening recommendation (Advise) that also describes patient eligibility (Assess) and provides help to obtain screening (Assist) may lead to improved adherence to CRC screening.

KW - Colorectal cancer screening

KW - Decision making

KW - Patient-physician communication

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84890132310&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84890132310&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.pec.2013.09.008

DO - 10.1016/j.pec.2013.09.008

M3 - Article

VL - 94

SP - 76

EP - 82

JO - Patient Education and Counseling

JF - Patient Education and Counseling

SN - 0738-3991

IS - 1

ER -