Patient Outcomes After Lumbar Spinal Fusions

Judith A. Turner, Mary Ersek, Larry Herron, Jodie Haselkorn, Daniel Kent, Marcia A. Ciol, Richard (Rick) Deyo

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

416 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives. —To determine success and complication rates for lumbar spinal fusion surgery, predictors of good outcomes, and whether fusion improves success rates of laminectomy for specific low back disorders. Data Sources. —English-language journal articles published from 1966 through April 1991, identified through MEDLINE searching (spinalfusion plus limiting terms), bibliography review, and expert consultation. Study Selection. —Articles were selected only if they reported at least 1 year of follow-up data enabling the classification of clinical outcomes as satisfactory or unsatisfactory for at least 30 patients. Data Extraction. —Two reviewers independently extracted data on patient characteristics, surgical methods, patient outcomes, and quality of study methods. Data Synthesis. —Of 47 articles, there were no randomized trials. Four nonrandomized studies compared surgery with and without fusion for herniated disks; three found no advantage for fusion. On average, 68% of patients had a satisfactory outcome after fusion, but the range was wide (16% to 95%), and the satisfactory outcome rate was lower in prospective than in retrospective studies. The most frequently reported complications were pseudarthrosis (14%) and chronic pain at the bone graft donor site (9%). Clinical outcomes did not differ by diagnosis or fusion technique, but were worse in studies with a greater number of previously operated patients. Conclusions. —For several low back disorders no advantage has been demonstrated for fusion over surgery without fusion, and complications of fusions are common. Randomized controlled trials are needed to compare fusion, surgery without fusion, and nonsurgical treatments in rigorously defined patient groups.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)907-911
Number of pages5
JournalJAMA - Journal of the American Medical Association
Volume268
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 19 1992
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Spinal Fusion
Intervertebral Disc Displacement
Pseudarthrosis
Laminectomy
Information Storage and Retrieval
Bibliography
MEDLINE
Chronic Pain
Language
Referral and Consultation
Randomized Controlled Trials
Retrospective Studies
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Tissue Donors
Transplants
Bone and Bones

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Patient Outcomes After Lumbar Spinal Fusions. / Turner, Judith A.; Ersek, Mary; Herron, Larry; Haselkorn, Jodie; Kent, Daniel; Ciol, Marcia A.; Deyo, Richard (Rick).

In: JAMA - Journal of the American Medical Association, Vol. 268, No. 7, 19.08.1992, p. 907-911.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Turner, JA, Ersek, M, Herron, L, Haselkorn, J, Kent, D, Ciol, MA & Deyo, RR 1992, 'Patient Outcomes After Lumbar Spinal Fusions', JAMA - Journal of the American Medical Association, vol. 268, no. 7, pp. 907-911. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1992.03490070089049
Turner JA, Ersek M, Herron L, Haselkorn J, Kent D, Ciol MA et al. Patient Outcomes After Lumbar Spinal Fusions. JAMA - Journal of the American Medical Association. 1992 Aug 19;268(7):907-911. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1992.03490070089049
Turner, Judith A. ; Ersek, Mary ; Herron, Larry ; Haselkorn, Jodie ; Kent, Daniel ; Ciol, Marcia A. ; Deyo, Richard (Rick). / Patient Outcomes After Lumbar Spinal Fusions. In: JAMA - Journal of the American Medical Association. 1992 ; Vol. 268, No. 7. pp. 907-911.
@article{78a69379d2524466bc9c2cc27b10f499,
title = "Patient Outcomes After Lumbar Spinal Fusions",
abstract = "Objectives. —To determine success and complication rates for lumbar spinal fusion surgery, predictors of good outcomes, and whether fusion improves success rates of laminectomy for specific low back disorders. Data Sources. —English-language journal articles published from 1966 through April 1991, identified through MEDLINE searching (spinalfusion plus limiting terms), bibliography review, and expert consultation. Study Selection. —Articles were selected only if they reported at least 1 year of follow-up data enabling the classification of clinical outcomes as satisfactory or unsatisfactory for at least 30 patients. Data Extraction. —Two reviewers independently extracted data on patient characteristics, surgical methods, patient outcomes, and quality of study methods. Data Synthesis. —Of 47 articles, there were no randomized trials. Four nonrandomized studies compared surgery with and without fusion for herniated disks; three found no advantage for fusion. On average, 68{\%} of patients had a satisfactory outcome after fusion, but the range was wide (16{\%} to 95{\%}), and the satisfactory outcome rate was lower in prospective than in retrospective studies. The most frequently reported complications were pseudarthrosis (14{\%}) and chronic pain at the bone graft donor site (9{\%}). Clinical outcomes did not differ by diagnosis or fusion technique, but were worse in studies with a greater number of previously operated patients. Conclusions. —For several low back disorders no advantage has been demonstrated for fusion over surgery without fusion, and complications of fusions are common. Randomized controlled trials are needed to compare fusion, surgery without fusion, and nonsurgical treatments in rigorously defined patient groups.",
author = "Turner, {Judith A.} and Mary Ersek and Larry Herron and Jodie Haselkorn and Daniel Kent and Ciol, {Marcia A.} and Deyo, {Richard (Rick)}",
year = "1992",
month = "8",
day = "19",
doi = "10.1001/jama.1992.03490070089049",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "268",
pages = "907--911",
journal = "JAMA - Journal of the American Medical Association",
issn = "0002-9955",
publisher = "American Medical Association",
number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Patient Outcomes After Lumbar Spinal Fusions

AU - Turner, Judith A.

AU - Ersek, Mary

AU - Herron, Larry

AU - Haselkorn, Jodie

AU - Kent, Daniel

AU - Ciol, Marcia A.

AU - Deyo, Richard (Rick)

PY - 1992/8/19

Y1 - 1992/8/19

N2 - Objectives. —To determine success and complication rates for lumbar spinal fusion surgery, predictors of good outcomes, and whether fusion improves success rates of laminectomy for specific low back disorders. Data Sources. —English-language journal articles published from 1966 through April 1991, identified through MEDLINE searching (spinalfusion plus limiting terms), bibliography review, and expert consultation. Study Selection. —Articles were selected only if they reported at least 1 year of follow-up data enabling the classification of clinical outcomes as satisfactory or unsatisfactory for at least 30 patients. Data Extraction. —Two reviewers independently extracted data on patient characteristics, surgical methods, patient outcomes, and quality of study methods. Data Synthesis. —Of 47 articles, there were no randomized trials. Four nonrandomized studies compared surgery with and without fusion for herniated disks; three found no advantage for fusion. On average, 68% of patients had a satisfactory outcome after fusion, but the range was wide (16% to 95%), and the satisfactory outcome rate was lower in prospective than in retrospective studies. The most frequently reported complications were pseudarthrosis (14%) and chronic pain at the bone graft donor site (9%). Clinical outcomes did not differ by diagnosis or fusion technique, but were worse in studies with a greater number of previously operated patients. Conclusions. —For several low back disorders no advantage has been demonstrated for fusion over surgery without fusion, and complications of fusions are common. Randomized controlled trials are needed to compare fusion, surgery without fusion, and nonsurgical treatments in rigorously defined patient groups.

AB - Objectives. —To determine success and complication rates for lumbar spinal fusion surgery, predictors of good outcomes, and whether fusion improves success rates of laminectomy for specific low back disorders. Data Sources. —English-language journal articles published from 1966 through April 1991, identified through MEDLINE searching (spinalfusion plus limiting terms), bibliography review, and expert consultation. Study Selection. —Articles were selected only if they reported at least 1 year of follow-up data enabling the classification of clinical outcomes as satisfactory or unsatisfactory for at least 30 patients. Data Extraction. —Two reviewers independently extracted data on patient characteristics, surgical methods, patient outcomes, and quality of study methods. Data Synthesis. —Of 47 articles, there were no randomized trials. Four nonrandomized studies compared surgery with and without fusion for herniated disks; three found no advantage for fusion. On average, 68% of patients had a satisfactory outcome after fusion, but the range was wide (16% to 95%), and the satisfactory outcome rate was lower in prospective than in retrospective studies. The most frequently reported complications were pseudarthrosis (14%) and chronic pain at the bone graft donor site (9%). Clinical outcomes did not differ by diagnosis or fusion technique, but were worse in studies with a greater number of previously operated patients. Conclusions. —For several low back disorders no advantage has been demonstrated for fusion over surgery without fusion, and complications of fusions are common. Randomized controlled trials are needed to compare fusion, surgery without fusion, and nonsurgical treatments in rigorously defined patient groups.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0026683235&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0026683235&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1001/jama.1992.03490070089049

DO - 10.1001/jama.1992.03490070089049

M3 - Article

C2 - 1640622

AN - SCOPUS:0026683235

VL - 268

SP - 907

EP - 911

JO - JAMA - Journal of the American Medical Association

JF - JAMA - Journal of the American Medical Association

SN - 0002-9955

IS - 7

ER -