Patient-level interventions to prevent the acquisition of resistant Gram-negative bacteria in critically ill patients: A systematic review

A. Zaky, S. B. Zeliadt, Miriam Treggiari

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The rising incidence of multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacterial (MDR-GNB) infections acquired in intensive care units has prompted a variety of patient-level infection control efforts. However, it is not known whether these measures are effective in reducing colonisation and infection. The purpose of this systematic review was to assess the efficacy of patient-level interventions for the prevention of colonisation with MDR-GNB and whether these interventions are associated with a reduction in the rate of infection due to MDR-GNB in the intensive care unit. Searches were conducted on PubMed, Cochrane, EMBASE and World of Science databases to identify comparative interventional studies on patient-level interventions implemented in the intensive care unit. Literature published in English, Spanish or French from January 1, 2000, until April 30, 2013, was searched. A total of 631 reports were found and we included and analysed 13 comparative studies that reported outcomes for an intervention compared with a control group. There were ten randomised and three observational interventional trials evaluating seven interventions. Overall, there was a reduction in colonisation (odds ratio [OR] 0.75; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.66 to 0.85) and infection (OR 0.66; 95% CI 0.59 to 0.75) with MDR-GNB. This trend persisted after restricting pooled analysis to randomised controlled trials (pooled OR 0.66; 95% CI 0.57 to 0.76 and pooled OR 0.62; 95% CI 0.54 to 0.72, respectively). We identified a significant reduction in MDR-GNB colonisation and infection through the use of patient-level interventions. This effect was mostly accounted for by selective digestive decontamination. However, given the limitations of the analysed trials, adequately powered controlled studies are needed to further explore the effects of patient-level interventions on colonisation and infection with MDR-GNB.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)23-33
Number of pages11
JournalAnaesthesia and Intensive Care
Volume43
Issue number1
StatePublished - Jan 1 2015
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Gram-Negative Bacteria
Critical Illness
Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections
Odds Ratio
Confidence Intervals
Intensive Care Units
Infection
Decontamination
Infection Control
PubMed
Randomized Controlled Trials
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Databases
Control Groups
Incidence

Keywords

  • Decontamination
  • Gram-negative bacterial infections
  • Infection control
  • Intensive care units

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

@article{58c7bea48067487d8df25972aa9ba92d,
title = "Patient-level interventions to prevent the acquisition of resistant Gram-negative bacteria in critically ill patients: A systematic review",
abstract = "The rising incidence of multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacterial (MDR-GNB) infections acquired in intensive care units has prompted a variety of patient-level infection control efforts. However, it is not known whether these measures are effective in reducing colonisation and infection. The purpose of this systematic review was to assess the efficacy of patient-level interventions for the prevention of colonisation with MDR-GNB and whether these interventions are associated with a reduction in the rate of infection due to MDR-GNB in the intensive care unit. Searches were conducted on PubMed, Cochrane, EMBASE and World of Science databases to identify comparative interventional studies on patient-level interventions implemented in the intensive care unit. Literature published in English, Spanish or French from January 1, 2000, until April 30, 2013, was searched. A total of 631 reports were found and we included and analysed 13 comparative studies that reported outcomes for an intervention compared with a control group. There were ten randomised and three observational interventional trials evaluating seven interventions. Overall, there was a reduction in colonisation (odds ratio [OR] 0.75; 95{\%} confidence interval [CI] 0.66 to 0.85) and infection (OR 0.66; 95{\%} CI 0.59 to 0.75) with MDR-GNB. This trend persisted after restricting pooled analysis to randomised controlled trials (pooled OR 0.66; 95{\%} CI 0.57 to 0.76 and pooled OR 0.62; 95{\%} CI 0.54 to 0.72, respectively). We identified a significant reduction in MDR-GNB colonisation and infection through the use of patient-level interventions. This effect was mostly accounted for by selective digestive decontamination. However, given the limitations of the analysed trials, adequately powered controlled studies are needed to further explore the effects of patient-level interventions on colonisation and infection with MDR-GNB.",
keywords = "Decontamination, Gram-negative bacterial infections, Infection control, Intensive care units",
author = "A. Zaky and Zeliadt, {S. B.} and Miriam Treggiari",
year = "2015",
month = "1",
day = "1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "43",
pages = "23--33",
journal = "Anaesthesia and Intensive Care",
issn = "0310-057X",
publisher = "Australian Society of Anaesthetists",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Patient-level interventions to prevent the acquisition of resistant Gram-negative bacteria in critically ill patients

T2 - A systematic review

AU - Zaky, A.

AU - Zeliadt, S. B.

AU - Treggiari, Miriam

PY - 2015/1/1

Y1 - 2015/1/1

N2 - The rising incidence of multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacterial (MDR-GNB) infections acquired in intensive care units has prompted a variety of patient-level infection control efforts. However, it is not known whether these measures are effective in reducing colonisation and infection. The purpose of this systematic review was to assess the efficacy of patient-level interventions for the prevention of colonisation with MDR-GNB and whether these interventions are associated with a reduction in the rate of infection due to MDR-GNB in the intensive care unit. Searches were conducted on PubMed, Cochrane, EMBASE and World of Science databases to identify comparative interventional studies on patient-level interventions implemented in the intensive care unit. Literature published in English, Spanish or French from January 1, 2000, until April 30, 2013, was searched. A total of 631 reports were found and we included and analysed 13 comparative studies that reported outcomes for an intervention compared with a control group. There were ten randomised and three observational interventional trials evaluating seven interventions. Overall, there was a reduction in colonisation (odds ratio [OR] 0.75; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.66 to 0.85) and infection (OR 0.66; 95% CI 0.59 to 0.75) with MDR-GNB. This trend persisted after restricting pooled analysis to randomised controlled trials (pooled OR 0.66; 95% CI 0.57 to 0.76 and pooled OR 0.62; 95% CI 0.54 to 0.72, respectively). We identified a significant reduction in MDR-GNB colonisation and infection through the use of patient-level interventions. This effect was mostly accounted for by selective digestive decontamination. However, given the limitations of the analysed trials, adequately powered controlled studies are needed to further explore the effects of patient-level interventions on colonisation and infection with MDR-GNB.

AB - The rising incidence of multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacterial (MDR-GNB) infections acquired in intensive care units has prompted a variety of patient-level infection control efforts. However, it is not known whether these measures are effective in reducing colonisation and infection. The purpose of this systematic review was to assess the efficacy of patient-level interventions for the prevention of colonisation with MDR-GNB and whether these interventions are associated with a reduction in the rate of infection due to MDR-GNB in the intensive care unit. Searches were conducted on PubMed, Cochrane, EMBASE and World of Science databases to identify comparative interventional studies on patient-level interventions implemented in the intensive care unit. Literature published in English, Spanish or French from January 1, 2000, until April 30, 2013, was searched. A total of 631 reports were found and we included and analysed 13 comparative studies that reported outcomes for an intervention compared with a control group. There were ten randomised and three observational interventional trials evaluating seven interventions. Overall, there was a reduction in colonisation (odds ratio [OR] 0.75; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.66 to 0.85) and infection (OR 0.66; 95% CI 0.59 to 0.75) with MDR-GNB. This trend persisted after restricting pooled analysis to randomised controlled trials (pooled OR 0.66; 95% CI 0.57 to 0.76 and pooled OR 0.62; 95% CI 0.54 to 0.72, respectively). We identified a significant reduction in MDR-GNB colonisation and infection through the use of patient-level interventions. This effect was mostly accounted for by selective digestive decontamination. However, given the limitations of the analysed trials, adequately powered controlled studies are needed to further explore the effects of patient-level interventions on colonisation and infection with MDR-GNB.

KW - Decontamination

KW - Gram-negative bacterial infections

KW - Infection control

KW - Intensive care units

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84920463846&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84920463846&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 25579286

AN - SCOPUS:84920463846

VL - 43

SP - 23

EP - 33

JO - Anaesthesia and Intensive Care

JF - Anaesthesia and Intensive Care

SN - 0310-057X

IS - 1

ER -