Parallel imaging and diffusion tensor imaging for diffusion-weighted MRI of the liver: Preliminary experience in healthy volunteers

Bachir Taouli, Alastair J. Martin, Aliya Qayyum, Raphael B. Merriman, Daniel Vigneron, Benjamin M. Yen, Fergus Coakley

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

115 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

OBJECTIVE. Our aim was to determine whether parallel imaging and diffusion tensor imaging affect the measurement of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) during diffusion-weighted MRI of the liver in healthy volunteers. SUBJECTS AND METHODS. We performed breath-hold single-shot echo-planar diffusion-weighted MRI of the liver in 10 healthy volunteers using conventional diffusion, conventional diffusion with parallel imaging, and diffusion tensor with parallel imaging sequences. TE values for the three sequences were 83, 74, and 63, respectively. Liver signal intensity was measured on all sequences and normalized to the SD of the measurement. Hepatic ADC was calculated by acquiring all sequences with b values of 0 and 500 sec/mm2. RESULTS. The normalized liver signal intensity was higher on diffusion tensor with parallel imaging and conventional diffusion with parallel imaging than on conventional diffusion without parallel imaging for a b value of 500 sec/mm2 (13.0 and 10.1 vs 9.1, respectively; p <0.03) and for a b value of 0 sec/mm 2 (9.0 and 7.6 vs 6.9, respectively; without reaching a significant difference, p = 0.12). Hepatic ADC was not significantly different between sequences (p = 0.16). CONCLUSION. Higher signal intensity can be obtained when using parallel imaging and diffusion tensor imaging during diffusion-weighted MRI of the liver without compromising hepatic ADC measurement.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)677-680
Number of pages4
JournalAmerican Journal of Roentgenology
Volume183
Issue number3
StatePublished - Sep 2004
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Diffusion Tensor Imaging
Healthy Volunteers
Liver

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging
  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology

Cite this

Parallel imaging and diffusion tensor imaging for diffusion-weighted MRI of the liver : Preliminary experience in healthy volunteers. / Taouli, Bachir; Martin, Alastair J.; Qayyum, Aliya; Merriman, Raphael B.; Vigneron, Daniel; Yen, Benjamin M.; Coakley, Fergus.

In: American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol. 183, No. 3, 09.2004, p. 677-680.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Taouli, Bachir ; Martin, Alastair J. ; Qayyum, Aliya ; Merriman, Raphael B. ; Vigneron, Daniel ; Yen, Benjamin M. ; Coakley, Fergus. / Parallel imaging and diffusion tensor imaging for diffusion-weighted MRI of the liver : Preliminary experience in healthy volunteers. In: American Journal of Roentgenology. 2004 ; Vol. 183, No. 3. pp. 677-680.
@article{2399c6229441446da02a5b51a787c41e,
title = "Parallel imaging and diffusion tensor imaging for diffusion-weighted MRI of the liver: Preliminary experience in healthy volunteers",
abstract = "OBJECTIVE. Our aim was to determine whether parallel imaging and diffusion tensor imaging affect the measurement of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) during diffusion-weighted MRI of the liver in healthy volunteers. SUBJECTS AND METHODS. We performed breath-hold single-shot echo-planar diffusion-weighted MRI of the liver in 10 healthy volunteers using conventional diffusion, conventional diffusion with parallel imaging, and diffusion tensor with parallel imaging sequences. TE values for the three sequences were 83, 74, and 63, respectively. Liver signal intensity was measured on all sequences and normalized to the SD of the measurement. Hepatic ADC was calculated by acquiring all sequences with b values of 0 and 500 sec/mm2. RESULTS. The normalized liver signal intensity was higher on diffusion tensor with parallel imaging and conventional diffusion with parallel imaging than on conventional diffusion without parallel imaging for a b value of 500 sec/mm2 (13.0 and 10.1 vs 9.1, respectively; p <0.03) and for a b value of 0 sec/mm 2 (9.0 and 7.6 vs 6.9, respectively; without reaching a significant difference, p = 0.12). Hepatic ADC was not significantly different between sequences (p = 0.16). CONCLUSION. Higher signal intensity can be obtained when using parallel imaging and diffusion tensor imaging during diffusion-weighted MRI of the liver without compromising hepatic ADC measurement.",
author = "Bachir Taouli and Martin, {Alastair J.} and Aliya Qayyum and Merriman, {Raphael B.} and Daniel Vigneron and Yen, {Benjamin M.} and Fergus Coakley",
year = "2004",
month = "9",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "183",
pages = "677--680",
journal = "AJR. American journal of roentgenology",
issn = "0361-803X",
publisher = "American Roentgen Ray Society",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Parallel imaging and diffusion tensor imaging for diffusion-weighted MRI of the liver

T2 - Preliminary experience in healthy volunteers

AU - Taouli, Bachir

AU - Martin, Alastair J.

AU - Qayyum, Aliya

AU - Merriman, Raphael B.

AU - Vigneron, Daniel

AU - Yen, Benjamin M.

AU - Coakley, Fergus

PY - 2004/9

Y1 - 2004/9

N2 - OBJECTIVE. Our aim was to determine whether parallel imaging and diffusion tensor imaging affect the measurement of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) during diffusion-weighted MRI of the liver in healthy volunteers. SUBJECTS AND METHODS. We performed breath-hold single-shot echo-planar diffusion-weighted MRI of the liver in 10 healthy volunteers using conventional diffusion, conventional diffusion with parallel imaging, and diffusion tensor with parallel imaging sequences. TE values for the three sequences were 83, 74, and 63, respectively. Liver signal intensity was measured on all sequences and normalized to the SD of the measurement. Hepatic ADC was calculated by acquiring all sequences with b values of 0 and 500 sec/mm2. RESULTS. The normalized liver signal intensity was higher on diffusion tensor with parallel imaging and conventional diffusion with parallel imaging than on conventional diffusion without parallel imaging for a b value of 500 sec/mm2 (13.0 and 10.1 vs 9.1, respectively; p <0.03) and for a b value of 0 sec/mm 2 (9.0 and 7.6 vs 6.9, respectively; without reaching a significant difference, p = 0.12). Hepatic ADC was not significantly different between sequences (p = 0.16). CONCLUSION. Higher signal intensity can be obtained when using parallel imaging and diffusion tensor imaging during diffusion-weighted MRI of the liver without compromising hepatic ADC measurement.

AB - OBJECTIVE. Our aim was to determine whether parallel imaging and diffusion tensor imaging affect the measurement of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) during diffusion-weighted MRI of the liver in healthy volunteers. SUBJECTS AND METHODS. We performed breath-hold single-shot echo-planar diffusion-weighted MRI of the liver in 10 healthy volunteers using conventional diffusion, conventional diffusion with parallel imaging, and diffusion tensor with parallel imaging sequences. TE values for the three sequences were 83, 74, and 63, respectively. Liver signal intensity was measured on all sequences and normalized to the SD of the measurement. Hepatic ADC was calculated by acquiring all sequences with b values of 0 and 500 sec/mm2. RESULTS. The normalized liver signal intensity was higher on diffusion tensor with parallel imaging and conventional diffusion with parallel imaging than on conventional diffusion without parallel imaging for a b value of 500 sec/mm2 (13.0 and 10.1 vs 9.1, respectively; p <0.03) and for a b value of 0 sec/mm 2 (9.0 and 7.6 vs 6.9, respectively; without reaching a significant difference, p = 0.12). Hepatic ADC was not significantly different between sequences (p = 0.16). CONCLUSION. Higher signal intensity can be obtained when using parallel imaging and diffusion tensor imaging during diffusion-weighted MRI of the liver without compromising hepatic ADC measurement.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=4344712574&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=4344712574&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 15333355

AN - SCOPUS:4344712574

VL - 183

SP - 677

EP - 680

JO - AJR. American journal of roentgenology

JF - AJR. American journal of roentgenology

SN - 0361-803X

IS - 3

ER -