Paracervical block for pain control in first-trimester surgical abortion

A randomized controlled trial

Regina Maria Renner, Mark D. Nichols, Jeffrey Jensen, Hong Li, Alison Edelman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

30 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

OBJECTIVE:: Despite lack of efficacy data, the majority of first-trimester surgical abortions are performed with a paracervical block. Women may be unnecessarily exposed to a painful injection and potentially noxious medication. Our objective was to estimate the effect of a paracervical block and the effect of gestational age on patient pain perception. METHODS:: This was a randomized, single-blind trial of patients undergoing abortion receiving paracervical block or sham stratified by gestational age (early: less than 8 weeks of gestation, n=60; late: 8-10 6/7 weeks of gestation, n=60). Premedicated with ibuprofen and lorazepam, all participants received 2 mL 1% buffered lidocaine injected at the tenaculum site followed by a slow, deep injection of 18 mL at four sites (block) or no injection (sham) with a 3-minute wait. The primary outcome was dilation pain (100-mm visual analog scale). Secondary outcomes included pain at additional time points, satisfaction, need for more analgesics, and adverse events. RESULTS:: Full enrollment occurred (n=120). We used intent-to-treat analysis. Demographics did not differ between groups. Paracervical block administration was painful (mean 55 mm compared with sham 30 mm, P

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1030-1037
Number of pages8
JournalObstetrics and Gynecology
Volume119
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - May 2012

Fingerprint

Obstetrical Anesthesia
First Pregnancy Trimester
Randomized Controlled Trials
Pain
Injections
Gestational Age
Lorazepam
Pregnancy
Pain Perception
Ibuprofen
Lidocaine
Visual Analog Scale
Analgesics
Dilatation
Demography

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Obstetrics and Gynecology

Cite this

Paracervical block for pain control in first-trimester surgical abortion : A randomized controlled trial. / Renner, Regina Maria; Nichols, Mark D.; Jensen, Jeffrey; Li, Hong; Edelman, Alison.

In: Obstetrics and Gynecology, Vol. 119, No. 5, 05.2012, p. 1030-1037.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{16939d92541f46e7ac60b9098c124c62,
title = "Paracervical block for pain control in first-trimester surgical abortion: A randomized controlled trial",
abstract = "OBJECTIVE:: Despite lack of efficacy data, the majority of first-trimester surgical abortions are performed with a paracervical block. Women may be unnecessarily exposed to a painful injection and potentially noxious medication. Our objective was to estimate the effect of a paracervical block and the effect of gestational age on patient pain perception. METHODS:: This was a randomized, single-blind trial of patients undergoing abortion receiving paracervical block or sham stratified by gestational age (early: less than 8 weeks of gestation, n=60; late: 8-10 6/7 weeks of gestation, n=60). Premedicated with ibuprofen and lorazepam, all participants received 2 mL 1{\%} buffered lidocaine injected at the tenaculum site followed by a slow, deep injection of 18 mL at four sites (block) or no injection (sham) with a 3-minute wait. The primary outcome was dilation pain (100-mm visual analog scale). Secondary outcomes included pain at additional time points, satisfaction, need for more analgesics, and adverse events. RESULTS:: Full enrollment occurred (n=120). We used intent-to-treat analysis. Demographics did not differ between groups. Paracervical block administration was painful (mean 55 mm compared with sham 30 mm, P",
author = "Renner, {Regina Maria} and Nichols, {Mark D.} and Jeffrey Jensen and Hong Li and Alison Edelman",
year = "2012",
month = "5",
doi = "10.1097/AOG.0b013e318250b13e",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "119",
pages = "1030--1037",
journal = "Obstetrics and Gynecology",
issn = "0029-7844",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Paracervical block for pain control in first-trimester surgical abortion

T2 - A randomized controlled trial

AU - Renner, Regina Maria

AU - Nichols, Mark D.

AU - Jensen, Jeffrey

AU - Li, Hong

AU - Edelman, Alison

PY - 2012/5

Y1 - 2012/5

N2 - OBJECTIVE:: Despite lack of efficacy data, the majority of first-trimester surgical abortions are performed with a paracervical block. Women may be unnecessarily exposed to a painful injection and potentially noxious medication. Our objective was to estimate the effect of a paracervical block and the effect of gestational age on patient pain perception. METHODS:: This was a randomized, single-blind trial of patients undergoing abortion receiving paracervical block or sham stratified by gestational age (early: less than 8 weeks of gestation, n=60; late: 8-10 6/7 weeks of gestation, n=60). Premedicated with ibuprofen and lorazepam, all participants received 2 mL 1% buffered lidocaine injected at the tenaculum site followed by a slow, deep injection of 18 mL at four sites (block) or no injection (sham) with a 3-minute wait. The primary outcome was dilation pain (100-mm visual analog scale). Secondary outcomes included pain at additional time points, satisfaction, need for more analgesics, and adverse events. RESULTS:: Full enrollment occurred (n=120). We used intent-to-treat analysis. Demographics did not differ between groups. Paracervical block administration was painful (mean 55 mm compared with sham 30 mm, P

AB - OBJECTIVE:: Despite lack of efficacy data, the majority of first-trimester surgical abortions are performed with a paracervical block. Women may be unnecessarily exposed to a painful injection and potentially noxious medication. Our objective was to estimate the effect of a paracervical block and the effect of gestational age on patient pain perception. METHODS:: This was a randomized, single-blind trial of patients undergoing abortion receiving paracervical block or sham stratified by gestational age (early: less than 8 weeks of gestation, n=60; late: 8-10 6/7 weeks of gestation, n=60). Premedicated with ibuprofen and lorazepam, all participants received 2 mL 1% buffered lidocaine injected at the tenaculum site followed by a slow, deep injection of 18 mL at four sites (block) or no injection (sham) with a 3-minute wait. The primary outcome was dilation pain (100-mm visual analog scale). Secondary outcomes included pain at additional time points, satisfaction, need for more analgesics, and adverse events. RESULTS:: Full enrollment occurred (n=120). We used intent-to-treat analysis. Demographics did not differ between groups. Paracervical block administration was painful (mean 55 mm compared with sham 30 mm, P

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84860113386&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84860113386&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/AOG.0b013e318250b13e

DO - 10.1097/AOG.0b013e318250b13e

M3 - Article

VL - 119

SP - 1030

EP - 1037

JO - Obstetrics and Gynecology

JF - Obstetrics and Gynecology

SN - 0029-7844

IS - 5

ER -