Overview of best practices in conducting comparative-effectiveness reviews

Jeanne-Marie Guise, M. Viswanathan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Comparative-effectiveness research (CER) reviews translate mountains of evidence into manageable and meaningful messages to inform clinical practice. CER reviews also have the potential to shorten the pipeline between research and practice. Reaching these goals through CER reviews requires adherence to CER principles and procedures, as well as the use of appropriate quantitative methods, qualitative methods, and clinical judgment. Comprehensiveness, objectivity, transparency, scientific rigor, relevance, and responsiveness are the principles that underpin best practices in conducting a CER review.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)876-882
Number of pages7
JournalClinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics
Volume90
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2011

Fingerprint

Comparative Effectiveness Research
Practice Guidelines
Research

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pharmacology
  • Pharmacology (medical)

Cite this

Overview of best practices in conducting comparative-effectiveness reviews. / Guise, Jeanne-Marie; Viswanathan, M.

In: Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Vol. 90, No. 6, 12.2011, p. 876-882.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{3b670385fbed4b9b83aaa340944a2dea,
title = "Overview of best practices in conducting comparative-effectiveness reviews",
abstract = "Comparative-effectiveness research (CER) reviews translate mountains of evidence into manageable and meaningful messages to inform clinical practice. CER reviews also have the potential to shorten the pipeline between research and practice. Reaching these goals through CER reviews requires adherence to CER principles and procedures, as well as the use of appropriate quantitative methods, qualitative methods, and clinical judgment. Comprehensiveness, objectivity, transparency, scientific rigor, relevance, and responsiveness are the principles that underpin best practices in conducting a CER review.",
author = "Jeanne-Marie Guise and M. Viswanathan",
year = "2011",
month = "12",
doi = "10.1038/clpt.2011.239",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "90",
pages = "876--882",
journal = "Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics",
issn = "0009-9236",
publisher = "Nature Publishing Group",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Overview of best practices in conducting comparative-effectiveness reviews

AU - Guise, Jeanne-Marie

AU - Viswanathan, M.

PY - 2011/12

Y1 - 2011/12

N2 - Comparative-effectiveness research (CER) reviews translate mountains of evidence into manageable and meaningful messages to inform clinical practice. CER reviews also have the potential to shorten the pipeline between research and practice. Reaching these goals through CER reviews requires adherence to CER principles and procedures, as well as the use of appropriate quantitative methods, qualitative methods, and clinical judgment. Comprehensiveness, objectivity, transparency, scientific rigor, relevance, and responsiveness are the principles that underpin best practices in conducting a CER review.

AB - Comparative-effectiveness research (CER) reviews translate mountains of evidence into manageable and meaningful messages to inform clinical practice. CER reviews also have the potential to shorten the pipeline between research and practice. Reaching these goals through CER reviews requires adherence to CER principles and procedures, as well as the use of appropriate quantitative methods, qualitative methods, and clinical judgment. Comprehensiveness, objectivity, transparency, scientific rigor, relevance, and responsiveness are the principles that underpin best practices in conducting a CER review.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=81355142007&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=81355142007&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1038/clpt.2011.239

DO - 10.1038/clpt.2011.239

M3 - Article

C2 - 22048219

AN - SCOPUS:81355142007

VL - 90

SP - 876

EP - 882

JO - Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics

JF - Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics

SN - 0009-9236

IS - 6

ER -