Outrigger rod technique for supplemental support of posterior spinal arthrodesis

Mark A. Palumbo, Kalpit N. Shah, Craig P. Eberson, Robert Hart, Alan H. Daniels

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

15 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background context Instrumentation failure is a recognized complication after complex spinal reconstruction and deformity correction. Rod fracture (RF) is the most frequent mode of hardware failure in long-segment spinal fusion surgery. This complication can negatively impact the clinical outcome by producing spinal pain, functional compromise, instability, and loss of deformity correction. Purpose To describe the outrigger rod surgical technique. Study design Review of literature, case review, and surgical technique description. Patient sample Two clinical cases are presented. Outcome measures Rod fracture. Methods Outrigger rod placement in posterior spinal arthrodesis is performed by supplementing primary spinal rods with outrigger rods attached with cranial and caudal side-by-side connectors providing a more robust construct. Results This technique may be beneficial for preventing RF in patients undergoing surgery for three-column osteotomy for sagittal imbalance; pseudarthrosis surgery with previous hardware failure; transforaminal lumbar interbody cage placement at multiple levels in realignment procedures, long-segment spinal arthrodesis with impaired host fusion potential; long-segment instrumented fusions that span the cervicothoracic, thoracolumbar, or lumbosacral junction; and across spinal segments at high risk for RF (eg, after extensive resection of vertebral elements in the management of metastatic malignancy). Conclusions The risk of rod failure is substantial in the setting of long-segment spinal arthrodesis and corrective osteotomy. Efforts to increase the mechanical strength of posterior constructs may reduce the occurrence of this complication. The outrigger rod technique increases spinal construct stiffness and may improve the longevity of the construct. This technique should reduce the rate of device failure during maturation of posterior fusion mass and limit the need for supplemental anterior column support.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1409-1414
Number of pages6
JournalSpine Journal
Volume15
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1 2015
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Arthrodesis
Osteotomy
Equipment Failure
Spinal Fusion
Pseudarthrosis
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Pain
Neoplasms

Keywords

  • Instrumentation failure
  • Long-segment fusion
  • Ourigger rod
  • Revision surgery
  • Rod fracture (RF)
  • Spinal deformity

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Neurology
  • Surgery

Cite this

Palumbo, M. A., Shah, K. N., Eberson, C. P., Hart, R., & Daniels, A. H. (2015). Outrigger rod technique for supplemental support of posterior spinal arthrodesis. Spine Journal, 15(6), 1409-1414. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2015.03.004

Outrigger rod technique for supplemental support of posterior spinal arthrodesis. / Palumbo, Mark A.; Shah, Kalpit N.; Eberson, Craig P.; Hart, Robert; Daniels, Alan H.

In: Spine Journal, Vol. 15, No. 6, 01.06.2015, p. 1409-1414.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Palumbo, MA, Shah, KN, Eberson, CP, Hart, R & Daniels, AH 2015, 'Outrigger rod technique for supplemental support of posterior spinal arthrodesis', Spine Journal, vol. 15, no. 6, pp. 1409-1414. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2015.03.004
Palumbo, Mark A. ; Shah, Kalpit N. ; Eberson, Craig P. ; Hart, Robert ; Daniels, Alan H. / Outrigger rod technique for supplemental support of posterior spinal arthrodesis. In: Spine Journal. 2015 ; Vol. 15, No. 6. pp. 1409-1414.
@article{3bf7389da6a9416ea2d3997b01365770,
title = "Outrigger rod technique for supplemental support of posterior spinal arthrodesis",
abstract = "Background context Instrumentation failure is a recognized complication after complex spinal reconstruction and deformity correction. Rod fracture (RF) is the most frequent mode of hardware failure in long-segment spinal fusion surgery. This complication can negatively impact the clinical outcome by producing spinal pain, functional compromise, instability, and loss of deformity correction. Purpose To describe the outrigger rod surgical technique. Study design Review of literature, case review, and surgical technique description. Patient sample Two clinical cases are presented. Outcome measures Rod fracture. Methods Outrigger rod placement in posterior spinal arthrodesis is performed by supplementing primary spinal rods with outrigger rods attached with cranial and caudal side-by-side connectors providing a more robust construct. Results This technique may be beneficial for preventing RF in patients undergoing surgery for three-column osteotomy for sagittal imbalance; pseudarthrosis surgery with previous hardware failure; transforaminal lumbar interbody cage placement at multiple levels in realignment procedures, long-segment spinal arthrodesis with impaired host fusion potential; long-segment instrumented fusions that span the cervicothoracic, thoracolumbar, or lumbosacral junction; and across spinal segments at high risk for RF (eg, after extensive resection of vertebral elements in the management of metastatic malignancy). Conclusions The risk of rod failure is substantial in the setting of long-segment spinal arthrodesis and corrective osteotomy. Efforts to increase the mechanical strength of posterior constructs may reduce the occurrence of this complication. The outrigger rod technique increases spinal construct stiffness and may improve the longevity of the construct. This technique should reduce the rate of device failure during maturation of posterior fusion mass and limit the need for supplemental anterior column support.",
keywords = "Instrumentation failure, Long-segment fusion, Ourigger rod, Revision surgery, Rod fracture (RF), Spinal deformity",
author = "Palumbo, {Mark A.} and Shah, {Kalpit N.} and Eberson, {Craig P.} and Robert Hart and Daniels, {Alan H.}",
year = "2015",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.spinee.2015.03.004",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "15",
pages = "1409--1414",
journal = "Spine Journal",
issn = "1529-9430",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Outrigger rod technique for supplemental support of posterior spinal arthrodesis

AU - Palumbo, Mark A.

AU - Shah, Kalpit N.

AU - Eberson, Craig P.

AU - Hart, Robert

AU - Daniels, Alan H.

PY - 2015/6/1

Y1 - 2015/6/1

N2 - Background context Instrumentation failure is a recognized complication after complex spinal reconstruction and deformity correction. Rod fracture (RF) is the most frequent mode of hardware failure in long-segment spinal fusion surgery. This complication can negatively impact the clinical outcome by producing spinal pain, functional compromise, instability, and loss of deformity correction. Purpose To describe the outrigger rod surgical technique. Study design Review of literature, case review, and surgical technique description. Patient sample Two clinical cases are presented. Outcome measures Rod fracture. Methods Outrigger rod placement in posterior spinal arthrodesis is performed by supplementing primary spinal rods with outrigger rods attached with cranial and caudal side-by-side connectors providing a more robust construct. Results This technique may be beneficial for preventing RF in patients undergoing surgery for three-column osteotomy for sagittal imbalance; pseudarthrosis surgery with previous hardware failure; transforaminal lumbar interbody cage placement at multiple levels in realignment procedures, long-segment spinal arthrodesis with impaired host fusion potential; long-segment instrumented fusions that span the cervicothoracic, thoracolumbar, or lumbosacral junction; and across spinal segments at high risk for RF (eg, after extensive resection of vertebral elements in the management of metastatic malignancy). Conclusions The risk of rod failure is substantial in the setting of long-segment spinal arthrodesis and corrective osteotomy. Efforts to increase the mechanical strength of posterior constructs may reduce the occurrence of this complication. The outrigger rod technique increases spinal construct stiffness and may improve the longevity of the construct. This technique should reduce the rate of device failure during maturation of posterior fusion mass and limit the need for supplemental anterior column support.

AB - Background context Instrumentation failure is a recognized complication after complex spinal reconstruction and deformity correction. Rod fracture (RF) is the most frequent mode of hardware failure in long-segment spinal fusion surgery. This complication can negatively impact the clinical outcome by producing spinal pain, functional compromise, instability, and loss of deformity correction. Purpose To describe the outrigger rod surgical technique. Study design Review of literature, case review, and surgical technique description. Patient sample Two clinical cases are presented. Outcome measures Rod fracture. Methods Outrigger rod placement in posterior spinal arthrodesis is performed by supplementing primary spinal rods with outrigger rods attached with cranial and caudal side-by-side connectors providing a more robust construct. Results This technique may be beneficial for preventing RF in patients undergoing surgery for three-column osteotomy for sagittal imbalance; pseudarthrosis surgery with previous hardware failure; transforaminal lumbar interbody cage placement at multiple levels in realignment procedures, long-segment spinal arthrodesis with impaired host fusion potential; long-segment instrumented fusions that span the cervicothoracic, thoracolumbar, or lumbosacral junction; and across spinal segments at high risk for RF (eg, after extensive resection of vertebral elements in the management of metastatic malignancy). Conclusions The risk of rod failure is substantial in the setting of long-segment spinal arthrodesis and corrective osteotomy. Efforts to increase the mechanical strength of posterior constructs may reduce the occurrence of this complication. The outrigger rod technique increases spinal construct stiffness and may improve the longevity of the construct. This technique should reduce the rate of device failure during maturation of posterior fusion mass and limit the need for supplemental anterior column support.

KW - Instrumentation failure

KW - Long-segment fusion

KW - Ourigger rod

KW - Revision surgery

KW - Rod fracture (RF)

KW - Spinal deformity

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84930378822&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84930378822&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.spinee.2015.03.004

DO - 10.1016/j.spinee.2015.03.004

M3 - Article

C2 - 25771756

AN - SCOPUS:84930378822

VL - 15

SP - 1409

EP - 1414

JO - Spine Journal

JF - Spine Journal

SN - 1529-9430

IS - 6

ER -