Outcomes of open operation for aortoiliac occlusive disease after failed endovascular therapy

Rachel C. Danczyk, Erica L. Mitchell, Bryan D. Petersen, James Edwards, Timothy K. Liem, Gregory J. Landry, Gregory L. Moneta

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

16 Scopus citations


Objectives: To compare patient outcomes of primary open operation for aortoiliac occlusive disease (AIOD) with those of secondary open operations for failed endovascular therapy (ET) of AIOD. Design: A retrospective cohort study was performed analyzing demographic characteristics, comorbidities, and outcomes. Setting: Affiliated Veterans Affairs Hospital from January 1, 1998, through March 31, 2010. Patients: Patients who underwent primary open operation for AIOD or secondary open operation for failed ET of AIOD. Main Outcome Measures: Overall survival and limb salvage. Results: Primary open operations (n=153) were 67 aortobifemoral grafts (43.8%), 38 axillobifemoral grafts (24.8%), and 48 femoral-femoral grafts (31.4%). Secondary open operations (n=35) were 28 aortobifemoral grafts (80.0%), 5 axillobifemoral grafts (14.3%), and 2 femoral-femoral grafts (5.7%). Mean (SD) 5-year survival was 48.2%(5.6%) and 66.8%(10.0%), respectively, for patients undergoing primary vs secondary open surgery for AIOD (P=.01). There were 7 amputations during a mean follow-up of 3 years, all in the primary open surgery group. Conclusions: Despite a higher proportion of coronary artery disease and a 20% conversion of claudication to critical limb ischemia after failed ET for AIOD, survival was longer in patients undergoing secondary vs primary open surgery. Patients who underwent open surgery after failed ET for AIOD did not require amputation. Failed ET for AIOD does not lead to worse outcomes for patients undergoing open surgery for AIOD.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)841-845
Number of pages5
JournalArchives of Surgery
Issue number9
StatePublished - Sep 2012

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery


Dive into the research topics of 'Outcomes of open operation for aortoiliac occlusive disease after failed endovascular therapy'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this