Outcomes of clinical trial: Tinnitus masking versus tinnitus retraining therapy

James Henry, Martin A. Schechter, Tara L. Zaugg, Susan Griest, Pawel J. Jastreboff, Jack A. Vernon, Christine Kaelin, Mary B. Meikle, Karen Lyons, Barbara J. Stewart

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

94 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

A controlled clinical study was conducted to evaluate prospectively the clinical efficacy of tinnitus masking (TM) and tinnitus retraining therapy (TRT) in military veterans having clinically significant tinnitus. Qualifying patients were placed into the two groups in an alternating manner (to avoid selection bias), and treatment was administered at 0, 3, 6, 12, and 18 months. Outcomes of treatment were evaluated using three self-administered tinnitus questionnaires (Tinnitus Handicap Inventory, Tinnitus Handicap Questionnaire, Tinnitus Severity Index) and the verbally administered TRT interview forms. Findings are presented from the three written questionnaires, and from two of the interview questions (percentage time aware of, and annoyed by, tinnitus). Outcomes were analyzed on an intent-to-treat basis, using a multilevel modeling approach. Of the 123 patients enrolled, 118 were included in the analysis. Both groups showed significant declines (improvements) on these measures, with the TRT decline being significantly greater than for TM. The greater declines in TRT compared to TM occurred most strongly in patients who began treatment with a "very big" tinnitus problem. When patients began treatment with a "moderate" tinnitus problem, the benefits of TRT compared to TM were more modest.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)104-132
Number of pages29
JournalJournal of the American Academy of Audiology
Volume17
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 2006

Fingerprint

Tinnitus
Clinical Trials
Therapeutics
Interviews
Selection Bias
Veterans

Keywords

  • Clinical trial
  • Hearing disorders
  • Military veterans
  • Rehabilitation
  • Tinnitus

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Otorhinolaryngology

Cite this

Henry, J., Schechter, M. A., Zaugg, T. L., Griest, S., Jastreboff, P. J., Vernon, J. A., ... Stewart, B. J. (2006). Outcomes of clinical trial: Tinnitus masking versus tinnitus retraining therapy. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, 17(2), 104-132. https://doi.org/10.3766/jaaa.17.2.4

Outcomes of clinical trial : Tinnitus masking versus tinnitus retraining therapy. / Henry, James; Schechter, Martin A.; Zaugg, Tara L.; Griest, Susan; Jastreboff, Pawel J.; Vernon, Jack A.; Kaelin, Christine; Meikle, Mary B.; Lyons, Karen; Stewart, Barbara J.

In: Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, Vol. 17, No. 2, 02.2006, p. 104-132.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Henry, J, Schechter, MA, Zaugg, TL, Griest, S, Jastreboff, PJ, Vernon, JA, Kaelin, C, Meikle, MB, Lyons, K & Stewart, BJ 2006, 'Outcomes of clinical trial: Tinnitus masking versus tinnitus retraining therapy', Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 104-132. https://doi.org/10.3766/jaaa.17.2.4
Henry, James ; Schechter, Martin A. ; Zaugg, Tara L. ; Griest, Susan ; Jastreboff, Pawel J. ; Vernon, Jack A. ; Kaelin, Christine ; Meikle, Mary B. ; Lyons, Karen ; Stewart, Barbara J. / Outcomes of clinical trial : Tinnitus masking versus tinnitus retraining therapy. In: Journal of the American Academy of Audiology. 2006 ; Vol. 17, No. 2. pp. 104-132.
@article{f043356387a94fb0b40cf15288a1531b,
title = "Outcomes of clinical trial: Tinnitus masking versus tinnitus retraining therapy",
abstract = "A controlled clinical study was conducted to evaluate prospectively the clinical efficacy of tinnitus masking (TM) and tinnitus retraining therapy (TRT) in military veterans having clinically significant tinnitus. Qualifying patients were placed into the two groups in an alternating manner (to avoid selection bias), and treatment was administered at 0, 3, 6, 12, and 18 months. Outcomes of treatment were evaluated using three self-administered tinnitus questionnaires (Tinnitus Handicap Inventory, Tinnitus Handicap Questionnaire, Tinnitus Severity Index) and the verbally administered TRT interview forms. Findings are presented from the three written questionnaires, and from two of the interview questions (percentage time aware of, and annoyed by, tinnitus). Outcomes were analyzed on an intent-to-treat basis, using a multilevel modeling approach. Of the 123 patients enrolled, 118 were included in the analysis. Both groups showed significant declines (improvements) on these measures, with the TRT decline being significantly greater than for TM. The greater declines in TRT compared to TM occurred most strongly in patients who began treatment with a {"}very big{"} tinnitus problem. When patients began treatment with a {"}moderate{"} tinnitus problem, the benefits of TRT compared to TM were more modest.",
keywords = "Clinical trial, Hearing disorders, Military veterans, Rehabilitation, Tinnitus",
author = "James Henry and Schechter, {Martin A.} and Zaugg, {Tara L.} and Susan Griest and Jastreboff, {Pawel J.} and Vernon, {Jack A.} and Christine Kaelin and Meikle, {Mary B.} and Karen Lyons and Stewart, {Barbara J.}",
year = "2006",
month = "2",
doi = "10.3766/jaaa.17.2.4",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "17",
pages = "104--132",
journal = "Journal of the American Academy of Audiology",
issn = "1050-0545",
publisher = "American Academy of Audiology",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Outcomes of clinical trial

T2 - Tinnitus masking versus tinnitus retraining therapy

AU - Henry, James

AU - Schechter, Martin A.

AU - Zaugg, Tara L.

AU - Griest, Susan

AU - Jastreboff, Pawel J.

AU - Vernon, Jack A.

AU - Kaelin, Christine

AU - Meikle, Mary B.

AU - Lyons, Karen

AU - Stewart, Barbara J.

PY - 2006/2

Y1 - 2006/2

N2 - A controlled clinical study was conducted to evaluate prospectively the clinical efficacy of tinnitus masking (TM) and tinnitus retraining therapy (TRT) in military veterans having clinically significant tinnitus. Qualifying patients were placed into the two groups in an alternating manner (to avoid selection bias), and treatment was administered at 0, 3, 6, 12, and 18 months. Outcomes of treatment were evaluated using three self-administered tinnitus questionnaires (Tinnitus Handicap Inventory, Tinnitus Handicap Questionnaire, Tinnitus Severity Index) and the verbally administered TRT interview forms. Findings are presented from the three written questionnaires, and from two of the interview questions (percentage time aware of, and annoyed by, tinnitus). Outcomes were analyzed on an intent-to-treat basis, using a multilevel modeling approach. Of the 123 patients enrolled, 118 were included in the analysis. Both groups showed significant declines (improvements) on these measures, with the TRT decline being significantly greater than for TM. The greater declines in TRT compared to TM occurred most strongly in patients who began treatment with a "very big" tinnitus problem. When patients began treatment with a "moderate" tinnitus problem, the benefits of TRT compared to TM were more modest.

AB - A controlled clinical study was conducted to evaluate prospectively the clinical efficacy of tinnitus masking (TM) and tinnitus retraining therapy (TRT) in military veterans having clinically significant tinnitus. Qualifying patients were placed into the two groups in an alternating manner (to avoid selection bias), and treatment was administered at 0, 3, 6, 12, and 18 months. Outcomes of treatment were evaluated using three self-administered tinnitus questionnaires (Tinnitus Handicap Inventory, Tinnitus Handicap Questionnaire, Tinnitus Severity Index) and the verbally administered TRT interview forms. Findings are presented from the three written questionnaires, and from two of the interview questions (percentage time aware of, and annoyed by, tinnitus). Outcomes were analyzed on an intent-to-treat basis, using a multilevel modeling approach. Of the 123 patients enrolled, 118 were included in the analysis. Both groups showed significant declines (improvements) on these measures, with the TRT decline being significantly greater than for TM. The greater declines in TRT compared to TM occurred most strongly in patients who began treatment with a "very big" tinnitus problem. When patients began treatment with a "moderate" tinnitus problem, the benefits of TRT compared to TM were more modest.

KW - Clinical trial

KW - Hearing disorders

KW - Military veterans

KW - Rehabilitation

KW - Tinnitus

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33747444293&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33747444293&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3766/jaaa.17.2.4

DO - 10.3766/jaaa.17.2.4

M3 - Article

C2 - 16640064

AN - SCOPUS:33747444293

VL - 17

SP - 104

EP - 132

JO - Journal of the American Academy of Audiology

JF - Journal of the American Academy of Audiology

SN - 1050-0545

IS - 2

ER -