Outcome science in practice: An overview and initial experience at the Vanderbilt Spine Center

Matthew J. McGirt, Theodore Speroff, Saniya Siraj Godil, Joseph S. Cheng, Nathan Selden, Anthony L. Asher

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In terms of policy, research, quality improvement, and practice-based learning, there are essential principles- namely, quality, effectiveness, and value of care-needed to navigate changes in the current and future US health care environment. Patient-centered outcome measurement lies at the core of all 3 principles. Multiple measures of diseasespecific disability, generic health-related quality of life, and preference-based health state have been introduced to quantify disease impact and define effectiveness of care. This paper reviews the basic principles of patient outcome measurement and commonly used outcome instruments. The authors provide examples of how utilization of outcome measurement tools in everyday neurosurgical practice can facilitate practice-based learning, quality improvement, and real-world comparative effectiveness research, as well as promote the value of neurosurgical care.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article numberE7
JournalNeurosurgical Focus
Volume34
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2013

Fingerprint

Quality Improvement
Spine
Comparative Effectiveness Research
Learning
Quality of Life
Delivery of Health Care
Health
Research

Keywords

  • Outcomes
  • Registry
  • Value

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Clinical Neurology

Cite this

Outcome science in practice : An overview and initial experience at the Vanderbilt Spine Center. / McGirt, Matthew J.; Speroff, Theodore; Godil, Saniya Siraj; Cheng, Joseph S.; Selden, Nathan; Asher, Anthony L.

In: Neurosurgical Focus, Vol. 34, No. 1, E7, 01.2013.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

McGirt, Matthew J. ; Speroff, Theodore ; Godil, Saniya Siraj ; Cheng, Joseph S. ; Selden, Nathan ; Asher, Anthony L. / Outcome science in practice : An overview and initial experience at the Vanderbilt Spine Center. In: Neurosurgical Focus. 2013 ; Vol. 34, No. 1.
@article{36f781b999224cfa848b9c63165dad9a,
title = "Outcome science in practice: An overview and initial experience at the Vanderbilt Spine Center",
abstract = "In terms of policy, research, quality improvement, and practice-based learning, there are essential principles- namely, quality, effectiveness, and value of care-needed to navigate changes in the current and future US health care environment. Patient-centered outcome measurement lies at the core of all 3 principles. Multiple measures of diseasespecific disability, generic health-related quality of life, and preference-based health state have been introduced to quantify disease impact and define effectiveness of care. This paper reviews the basic principles of patient outcome measurement and commonly used outcome instruments. The authors provide examples of how utilization of outcome measurement tools in everyday neurosurgical practice can facilitate practice-based learning, quality improvement, and real-world comparative effectiveness research, as well as promote the value of neurosurgical care.",
keywords = "Outcomes, Registry, Value",
author = "McGirt, {Matthew J.} and Theodore Speroff and Godil, {Saniya Siraj} and Cheng, {Joseph S.} and Nathan Selden and Asher, {Anthony L.}",
year = "2013",
month = "1",
doi = "10.3171/2012.10.FOCUS12298",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "34",
journal = "Neurosurgical Focus",
issn = "1092-0684",
publisher = "American Association of Neurological Surgeons",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Outcome science in practice

T2 - An overview and initial experience at the Vanderbilt Spine Center

AU - McGirt, Matthew J.

AU - Speroff, Theodore

AU - Godil, Saniya Siraj

AU - Cheng, Joseph S.

AU - Selden, Nathan

AU - Asher, Anthony L.

PY - 2013/1

Y1 - 2013/1

N2 - In terms of policy, research, quality improvement, and practice-based learning, there are essential principles- namely, quality, effectiveness, and value of care-needed to navigate changes in the current and future US health care environment. Patient-centered outcome measurement lies at the core of all 3 principles. Multiple measures of diseasespecific disability, generic health-related quality of life, and preference-based health state have been introduced to quantify disease impact and define effectiveness of care. This paper reviews the basic principles of patient outcome measurement and commonly used outcome instruments. The authors provide examples of how utilization of outcome measurement tools in everyday neurosurgical practice can facilitate practice-based learning, quality improvement, and real-world comparative effectiveness research, as well as promote the value of neurosurgical care.

AB - In terms of policy, research, quality improvement, and practice-based learning, there are essential principles- namely, quality, effectiveness, and value of care-needed to navigate changes in the current and future US health care environment. Patient-centered outcome measurement lies at the core of all 3 principles. Multiple measures of diseasespecific disability, generic health-related quality of life, and preference-based health state have been introduced to quantify disease impact and define effectiveness of care. This paper reviews the basic principles of patient outcome measurement and commonly used outcome instruments. The authors provide examples of how utilization of outcome measurement tools in everyday neurosurgical practice can facilitate practice-based learning, quality improvement, and real-world comparative effectiveness research, as well as promote the value of neurosurgical care.

KW - Outcomes

KW - Registry

KW - Value

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84873449720&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84873449720&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3171/2012.10.FOCUS12298

DO - 10.3171/2012.10.FOCUS12298

M3 - Article

C2 - 23278268

AN - SCOPUS:84873449720

VL - 34

JO - Neurosurgical Focus

JF - Neurosurgical Focus

SN - 1092-0684

IS - 1

M1 - E7

ER -