Out-of-hospital decision making and factors influencing the regional distribution of injured patients in a trauma system

Craig Newgard, Maria J. Nelson, Michael Kampp, Somnath (Som) Saha, Dana Zive, Terri Schmidt, Mohamud Ramzan Daya, Jonathan Jui, Lynn Wittwer, Craig Warden, Ritu Sahni, Mark Stevens, Kyle Gorman, Karl Koenig, Dean Gubler, Pontine Rosteck, Jan Lee, Jerris R. Hedges

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

49 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The decision-making processes used for out-of-hospital trauma triage and hospital selection in regionalized trauma systems remain poorly understood. The objective of this study was to assess the process of field triage decision making in an established trauma system. METHODS: We used a mixed methods approach, including emergency medical services (EMS) records to quantify triage decisions and reasons for hospital selection in a population-based, injury cohort (2006-2008), plus a focused ethnography to understand EMS cognitive reasoning in making triage decisions. The study included 10 EMS agencies providing service to a four-county regional trauma system with three trauma centers and 13 nontrauma hospitals. For qualitative analyses, we conducted field observation and interviews with 35 EMS field providers and a round table discussion with 40 EMS management personnel to generate an empirical model of out-of-hospital decision making in trauma triage. RESULTS: A total of 64,190 injured patients were evaluated by EMS, of whom 56,444 (88.0%) were transported to acute care hospitals and 9,637 (17.1% of transports) were field trauma activations. For nontrauma activations, patient/family preference and proximity accounted for 78% of destination decisions. EMS provider judgment was cited in 36% of field trauma activations and was the sole criterion in 23% of trauma patients. The empirical model demonstrated that trauma triage is driven primarily by EMS provider "gut feeling" (judgment) and relies heavily on provider experience, mechanism of injury, and early visual cues at the scene. CONCLUSIONS: Provider cognitive reasoning for field trauma triage is more heuristic than algorithmic and driven primarily by provider judgment, rather than specific triage criteria.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1345-1353
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of Trauma - Injury, Infection and Critical Care
Volume70
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2011

Fingerprint

Decision Making
Triage
Emergency Medical Services
Wounds and Injuries
Personnel Management
Cultural Anthropology
Patient Preference
Trauma Centers
Medical Records
Cues
Emotions
Observation
Interviews

Keywords

  • Cognitive reasoning
  • Emergency medical services
  • Trauma
  • Triage

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine

Cite this

Out-of-hospital decision making and factors influencing the regional distribution of injured patients in a trauma system. / Newgard, Craig; Nelson, Maria J.; Kampp, Michael; Saha, Somnath (Som); Zive, Dana; Schmidt, Terri; Daya, Mohamud Ramzan; Jui, Jonathan; Wittwer, Lynn; Warden, Craig; Sahni, Ritu; Stevens, Mark; Gorman, Kyle; Koenig, Karl; Gubler, Dean; Rosteck, Pontine; Lee, Jan; Hedges, Jerris R.

In: Journal of Trauma - Injury, Infection and Critical Care, Vol. 70, No. 6, 06.2011, p. 1345-1353.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Newgard, Craig ; Nelson, Maria J. ; Kampp, Michael ; Saha, Somnath (Som) ; Zive, Dana ; Schmidt, Terri ; Daya, Mohamud Ramzan ; Jui, Jonathan ; Wittwer, Lynn ; Warden, Craig ; Sahni, Ritu ; Stevens, Mark ; Gorman, Kyle ; Koenig, Karl ; Gubler, Dean ; Rosteck, Pontine ; Lee, Jan ; Hedges, Jerris R. / Out-of-hospital decision making and factors influencing the regional distribution of injured patients in a trauma system. In: Journal of Trauma - Injury, Infection and Critical Care. 2011 ; Vol. 70, No. 6. pp. 1345-1353.
@article{aa92398f12b34bda9c8b7b9e2c436eca,
title = "Out-of-hospital decision making and factors influencing the regional distribution of injured patients in a trauma system",
abstract = "BACKGROUND: The decision-making processes used for out-of-hospital trauma triage and hospital selection in regionalized trauma systems remain poorly understood. The objective of this study was to assess the process of field triage decision making in an established trauma system. METHODS: We used a mixed methods approach, including emergency medical services (EMS) records to quantify triage decisions and reasons for hospital selection in a population-based, injury cohort (2006-2008), plus a focused ethnography to understand EMS cognitive reasoning in making triage decisions. The study included 10 EMS agencies providing service to a four-county regional trauma system with three trauma centers and 13 nontrauma hospitals. For qualitative analyses, we conducted field observation and interviews with 35 EMS field providers and a round table discussion with 40 EMS management personnel to generate an empirical model of out-of-hospital decision making in trauma triage. RESULTS: A total of 64,190 injured patients were evaluated by EMS, of whom 56,444 (88.0{\%}) were transported to acute care hospitals and 9,637 (17.1{\%} of transports) were field trauma activations. For nontrauma activations, patient/family preference and proximity accounted for 78{\%} of destination decisions. EMS provider judgment was cited in 36{\%} of field trauma activations and was the sole criterion in 23{\%} of trauma patients. The empirical model demonstrated that trauma triage is driven primarily by EMS provider {"}gut feeling{"} (judgment) and relies heavily on provider experience, mechanism of injury, and early visual cues at the scene. CONCLUSIONS: Provider cognitive reasoning for field trauma triage is more heuristic than algorithmic and driven primarily by provider judgment, rather than specific triage criteria.",
keywords = "Cognitive reasoning, Emergency medical services, Trauma, Triage",
author = "Craig Newgard and Nelson, {Maria J.} and Michael Kampp and Saha, {Somnath (Som)} and Dana Zive and Terri Schmidt and Daya, {Mohamud Ramzan} and Jonathan Jui and Lynn Wittwer and Craig Warden and Ritu Sahni and Mark Stevens and Kyle Gorman and Karl Koenig and Dean Gubler and Pontine Rosteck and Jan Lee and Hedges, {Jerris R.}",
year = "2011",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1097/TA.0b013e3182191a1b",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "70",
pages = "1345--1353",
journal = "Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery",
issn = "2163-0755",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Out-of-hospital decision making and factors influencing the regional distribution of injured patients in a trauma system

AU - Newgard, Craig

AU - Nelson, Maria J.

AU - Kampp, Michael

AU - Saha, Somnath (Som)

AU - Zive, Dana

AU - Schmidt, Terri

AU - Daya, Mohamud Ramzan

AU - Jui, Jonathan

AU - Wittwer, Lynn

AU - Warden, Craig

AU - Sahni, Ritu

AU - Stevens, Mark

AU - Gorman, Kyle

AU - Koenig, Karl

AU - Gubler, Dean

AU - Rosteck, Pontine

AU - Lee, Jan

AU - Hedges, Jerris R.

PY - 2011/6

Y1 - 2011/6

N2 - BACKGROUND: The decision-making processes used for out-of-hospital trauma triage and hospital selection in regionalized trauma systems remain poorly understood. The objective of this study was to assess the process of field triage decision making in an established trauma system. METHODS: We used a mixed methods approach, including emergency medical services (EMS) records to quantify triage decisions and reasons for hospital selection in a population-based, injury cohort (2006-2008), plus a focused ethnography to understand EMS cognitive reasoning in making triage decisions. The study included 10 EMS agencies providing service to a four-county regional trauma system with three trauma centers and 13 nontrauma hospitals. For qualitative analyses, we conducted field observation and interviews with 35 EMS field providers and a round table discussion with 40 EMS management personnel to generate an empirical model of out-of-hospital decision making in trauma triage. RESULTS: A total of 64,190 injured patients were evaluated by EMS, of whom 56,444 (88.0%) were transported to acute care hospitals and 9,637 (17.1% of transports) were field trauma activations. For nontrauma activations, patient/family preference and proximity accounted for 78% of destination decisions. EMS provider judgment was cited in 36% of field trauma activations and was the sole criterion in 23% of trauma patients. The empirical model demonstrated that trauma triage is driven primarily by EMS provider "gut feeling" (judgment) and relies heavily on provider experience, mechanism of injury, and early visual cues at the scene. CONCLUSIONS: Provider cognitive reasoning for field trauma triage is more heuristic than algorithmic and driven primarily by provider judgment, rather than specific triage criteria.

AB - BACKGROUND: The decision-making processes used for out-of-hospital trauma triage and hospital selection in regionalized trauma systems remain poorly understood. The objective of this study was to assess the process of field triage decision making in an established trauma system. METHODS: We used a mixed methods approach, including emergency medical services (EMS) records to quantify triage decisions and reasons for hospital selection in a population-based, injury cohort (2006-2008), plus a focused ethnography to understand EMS cognitive reasoning in making triage decisions. The study included 10 EMS agencies providing service to a four-county regional trauma system with three trauma centers and 13 nontrauma hospitals. For qualitative analyses, we conducted field observation and interviews with 35 EMS field providers and a round table discussion with 40 EMS management personnel to generate an empirical model of out-of-hospital decision making in trauma triage. RESULTS: A total of 64,190 injured patients were evaluated by EMS, of whom 56,444 (88.0%) were transported to acute care hospitals and 9,637 (17.1% of transports) were field trauma activations. For nontrauma activations, patient/family preference and proximity accounted for 78% of destination decisions. EMS provider judgment was cited in 36% of field trauma activations and was the sole criterion in 23% of trauma patients. The empirical model demonstrated that trauma triage is driven primarily by EMS provider "gut feeling" (judgment) and relies heavily on provider experience, mechanism of injury, and early visual cues at the scene. CONCLUSIONS: Provider cognitive reasoning for field trauma triage is more heuristic than algorithmic and driven primarily by provider judgment, rather than specific triage criteria.

KW - Cognitive reasoning

KW - Emergency medical services

KW - Trauma

KW - Triage

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79958826775&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79958826775&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/TA.0b013e3182191a1b

DO - 10.1097/TA.0b013e3182191a1b

M3 - Article

VL - 70

SP - 1345

EP - 1353

JO - Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery

JF - Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery

SN - 2163-0755

IS - 6

ER -