Otitis media incidence and impact on the auditory brain stem response in lipopolysaccharide-nonresponsive C3H/HeJ mice

C. R. Mitchell, J. B. Kempton, B. Scott-Tyler, D. R. Trune

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

22 Scopus citations

Abstract

Although mice of the C3H strain normally respond to bacterial lipopolysaccharide with appropriate immune system activation, mice of the C3H/HeJ substrain do not because of a gene defect. This Suggests they may be more susceptible to Opportunistic bacterial infections and more likely to have otitis media than a normally responding substrain, such as the C3H/HeSnJ. Therefore these two substrains were evaluated for incidence of spontaneous middle ear disease at 2, 4, 6, 10, 12, 15, and 18 months of age. Auditory brain stem response audiometry to pure tones of 4,8, 16,24, and 32 kHz was performed to establish the impact of middle ear disease on auditory function None of the lipopolysaccharide-responsive C3H/HeSnJ mice demonstrated middle ear disease. However, middle ear disease was present in 38% of the C3H/HeJ mice. The conductive loss caused by otitis media resulted in auditory brain stem response threshold shifts of 15 to 40 dB SPL, lowered peak amplitudes, and increased latencies. Reduced lipopolysaccharide responsiveness by CSH/HeJ mice makes them less capable of reacting immunologically to bacterial infection and presumably underlies the failure to clear middle ear disease. The C3H/HeJ mouse may provide a valuable model in which to study lipopolysaccharide biologic activity and related middle ear inflammatory or immune mechanisms.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)459-464
Number of pages6
JournalOtolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery
Volume117
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - 1997

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Otorhinolaryngology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Otitis media incidence and impact on the auditory brain stem response in lipopolysaccharide-nonresponsive C3H/HeJ mice'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this