Osteoporosis and Hip Fracture Risk From Routine Computed Tomography Scans

The Fracture, Osteoporosis, and CT Utilization Study (FOCUS)

Annette L. Adams, Heidi Fischer, David L. Kopperdahl, David C. Lee, Dennis M. Black, Mary L. Bouxsein, Shireen Fatemi, Sundeep Khosla, Eric Orwoll, Ethel S. Siris, Tony M. Keaveny

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Methods now exist for analyzing previously taken clinical computed tomography (CT) scans to measure a dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA)-equivalent bone mineral density (BMD) at the hip and a finite element analysis-derived femoral strength. We assessed the efficacy of this "biomechanical CT" (BCT) approach for identifying patients at high risk of incident hip fracture in a large clinical setting. Using a case-cohort design sampled from 111,694 women and men aged 65 or older who had a prior hip CT scan, a DXA within 3 years of the CT, and no prior hip fracture, we compared those with subsequent hip fracture (n=1959) with randomly selected sex-stratified controls (n=1979) and analyzed their CT scans blinded to all other data. We found that the age-, race-, and body mass index (BMI)-adjusted hazard ratio (HR; per standard deviation) for femoral strength was significant before (women: HR=2.8, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.2-3.5; men: 2.8, 2.1-3.7) and after adjusting also for the (lowest) hip BMD T-score by BCT (women: 2.1, 1.4-3.2; men: 2.7, 1.6-4.6). The hazard ratio for the hip BMD T-score was similar between BCT and DXA for both sexes (women: 2.1, 1.8-2.5 BCT versus 2.1, 1.7-2.5 DXA; men: 2.8, 2.1-3.8 BCT versus 2.5, 2.0-3.2 DXA) and was higher than for the (lowest) spine/hip BMD T-score by DXA (women: 1.6, 1.4-1.9; men: 2.1, 1.6-2.7). Compared with the latter as a clinical-practice reference and using both femoral strength and the hip BMD T-score from BCT, sensitivity for predicting hip fracture was higher for BCT (women: 0.66 versus 0.59; men: 0.56 versus 0.48), with comparable respective specificity (women: 0.66 versus 0.67; men: 0.76 versus 0.78). We conclude that BCT analysis of previously acquired routine abdominal or pelvic CT scans is at least as effective as DXA testing for identifying patients at high risk of hip fracture.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalJournal of Bone and Mineral Research
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - Jan 1 2018

Fingerprint

Photon Absorptiometry
Hip Fractures
Osteoporosis
Pelvic Bones
Tomography
Bone Density
Thigh
Hip
Finite Element Analysis
Spine
Body Mass Index
Confidence Intervals

Keywords

  • BONE STRENGTH
  • COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY
  • DXA
  • FRACTURE RISK ASSESSMENT
  • OSTEOPOROSIS
  • SCREENING

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine

Cite this

Osteoporosis and Hip Fracture Risk From Routine Computed Tomography Scans : The Fracture, Osteoporosis, and CT Utilization Study (FOCUS). / Adams, Annette L.; Fischer, Heidi; Kopperdahl, David L.; Lee, David C.; Black, Dennis M.; Bouxsein, Mary L.; Fatemi, Shireen; Khosla, Sundeep; Orwoll, Eric; Siris, Ethel S.; Keaveny, Tony M.

In: Journal of Bone and Mineral Research, 01.01.2018.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Adams, Annette L. ; Fischer, Heidi ; Kopperdahl, David L. ; Lee, David C. ; Black, Dennis M. ; Bouxsein, Mary L. ; Fatemi, Shireen ; Khosla, Sundeep ; Orwoll, Eric ; Siris, Ethel S. ; Keaveny, Tony M. / Osteoporosis and Hip Fracture Risk From Routine Computed Tomography Scans : The Fracture, Osteoporosis, and CT Utilization Study (FOCUS). In: Journal of Bone and Mineral Research. 2018.
@article{bc17275cee5e464691a44d3d8ac8f38e,
title = "Osteoporosis and Hip Fracture Risk From Routine Computed Tomography Scans: The Fracture, Osteoporosis, and CT Utilization Study (FOCUS)",
abstract = "Methods now exist for analyzing previously taken clinical computed tomography (CT) scans to measure a dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA)-equivalent bone mineral density (BMD) at the hip and a finite element analysis-derived femoral strength. We assessed the efficacy of this {"}biomechanical CT{"} (BCT) approach for identifying patients at high risk of incident hip fracture in a large clinical setting. Using a case-cohort design sampled from 111,694 women and men aged 65 or older who had a prior hip CT scan, a DXA within 3 years of the CT, and no prior hip fracture, we compared those with subsequent hip fracture (n=1959) with randomly selected sex-stratified controls (n=1979) and analyzed their CT scans blinded to all other data. We found that the age-, race-, and body mass index (BMI)-adjusted hazard ratio (HR; per standard deviation) for femoral strength was significant before (women: HR=2.8, 95{\%} confidence interval [CI] 2.2-3.5; men: 2.8, 2.1-3.7) and after adjusting also for the (lowest) hip BMD T-score by BCT (women: 2.1, 1.4-3.2; men: 2.7, 1.6-4.6). The hazard ratio for the hip BMD T-score was similar between BCT and DXA for both sexes (women: 2.1, 1.8-2.5 BCT versus 2.1, 1.7-2.5 DXA; men: 2.8, 2.1-3.8 BCT versus 2.5, 2.0-3.2 DXA) and was higher than for the (lowest) spine/hip BMD T-score by DXA (women: 1.6, 1.4-1.9; men: 2.1, 1.6-2.7). Compared with the latter as a clinical-practice reference and using both femoral strength and the hip BMD T-score from BCT, sensitivity for predicting hip fracture was higher for BCT (women: 0.66 versus 0.59; men: 0.56 versus 0.48), with comparable respective specificity (women: 0.66 versus 0.67; men: 0.76 versus 0.78). We conclude that BCT analysis of previously acquired routine abdominal or pelvic CT scans is at least as effective as DXA testing for identifying patients at high risk of hip fracture.",
keywords = "BONE STRENGTH, COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY, DXA, FRACTURE RISK ASSESSMENT, OSTEOPOROSIS, SCREENING",
author = "Adams, {Annette L.} and Heidi Fischer and Kopperdahl, {David L.} and Lee, {David C.} and Black, {Dennis M.} and Bouxsein, {Mary L.} and Shireen Fatemi and Sundeep Khosla and Eric Orwoll and Siris, {Ethel S.} and Keaveny, {Tony M.}",
year = "2018",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1002/jbmr.3423",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Journal of Bone and Mineral Research",
issn = "0884-0431",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Osteoporosis and Hip Fracture Risk From Routine Computed Tomography Scans

T2 - The Fracture, Osteoporosis, and CT Utilization Study (FOCUS)

AU - Adams, Annette L.

AU - Fischer, Heidi

AU - Kopperdahl, David L.

AU - Lee, David C.

AU - Black, Dennis M.

AU - Bouxsein, Mary L.

AU - Fatemi, Shireen

AU - Khosla, Sundeep

AU - Orwoll, Eric

AU - Siris, Ethel S.

AU - Keaveny, Tony M.

PY - 2018/1/1

Y1 - 2018/1/1

N2 - Methods now exist for analyzing previously taken clinical computed tomography (CT) scans to measure a dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA)-equivalent bone mineral density (BMD) at the hip and a finite element analysis-derived femoral strength. We assessed the efficacy of this "biomechanical CT" (BCT) approach for identifying patients at high risk of incident hip fracture in a large clinical setting. Using a case-cohort design sampled from 111,694 women and men aged 65 or older who had a prior hip CT scan, a DXA within 3 years of the CT, and no prior hip fracture, we compared those with subsequent hip fracture (n=1959) with randomly selected sex-stratified controls (n=1979) and analyzed their CT scans blinded to all other data. We found that the age-, race-, and body mass index (BMI)-adjusted hazard ratio (HR; per standard deviation) for femoral strength was significant before (women: HR=2.8, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.2-3.5; men: 2.8, 2.1-3.7) and after adjusting also for the (lowest) hip BMD T-score by BCT (women: 2.1, 1.4-3.2; men: 2.7, 1.6-4.6). The hazard ratio for the hip BMD T-score was similar between BCT and DXA for both sexes (women: 2.1, 1.8-2.5 BCT versus 2.1, 1.7-2.5 DXA; men: 2.8, 2.1-3.8 BCT versus 2.5, 2.0-3.2 DXA) and was higher than for the (lowest) spine/hip BMD T-score by DXA (women: 1.6, 1.4-1.9; men: 2.1, 1.6-2.7). Compared with the latter as a clinical-practice reference and using both femoral strength and the hip BMD T-score from BCT, sensitivity for predicting hip fracture was higher for BCT (women: 0.66 versus 0.59; men: 0.56 versus 0.48), with comparable respective specificity (women: 0.66 versus 0.67; men: 0.76 versus 0.78). We conclude that BCT analysis of previously acquired routine abdominal or pelvic CT scans is at least as effective as DXA testing for identifying patients at high risk of hip fracture.

AB - Methods now exist for analyzing previously taken clinical computed tomography (CT) scans to measure a dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA)-equivalent bone mineral density (BMD) at the hip and a finite element analysis-derived femoral strength. We assessed the efficacy of this "biomechanical CT" (BCT) approach for identifying patients at high risk of incident hip fracture in a large clinical setting. Using a case-cohort design sampled from 111,694 women and men aged 65 or older who had a prior hip CT scan, a DXA within 3 years of the CT, and no prior hip fracture, we compared those with subsequent hip fracture (n=1959) with randomly selected sex-stratified controls (n=1979) and analyzed their CT scans blinded to all other data. We found that the age-, race-, and body mass index (BMI)-adjusted hazard ratio (HR; per standard deviation) for femoral strength was significant before (women: HR=2.8, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.2-3.5; men: 2.8, 2.1-3.7) and after adjusting also for the (lowest) hip BMD T-score by BCT (women: 2.1, 1.4-3.2; men: 2.7, 1.6-4.6). The hazard ratio for the hip BMD T-score was similar between BCT and DXA for both sexes (women: 2.1, 1.8-2.5 BCT versus 2.1, 1.7-2.5 DXA; men: 2.8, 2.1-3.8 BCT versus 2.5, 2.0-3.2 DXA) and was higher than for the (lowest) spine/hip BMD T-score by DXA (women: 1.6, 1.4-1.9; men: 2.1, 1.6-2.7). Compared with the latter as a clinical-practice reference and using both femoral strength and the hip BMD T-score from BCT, sensitivity for predicting hip fracture was higher for BCT (women: 0.66 versus 0.59; men: 0.56 versus 0.48), with comparable respective specificity (women: 0.66 versus 0.67; men: 0.76 versus 0.78). We conclude that BCT analysis of previously acquired routine abdominal or pelvic CT scans is at least as effective as DXA testing for identifying patients at high risk of hip fracture.

KW - BONE STRENGTH

KW - COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY

KW - DXA

KW - FRACTURE RISK ASSESSMENT

KW - OSTEOPOROSIS

KW - SCREENING

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85045835033&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85045835033&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/jbmr.3423

DO - 10.1002/jbmr.3423

M3 - Article

JO - Journal of Bone and Mineral Research

JF - Journal of Bone and Mineral Research

SN - 0884-0431

ER -