Optimizing sampling strategies for estimating quality-adjusted life years

Scott D. Ramsey, Ruth Etzioni, Andrea Troxel, Nicole Urban

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Accurate estimation of quality of life is critical to cost- effectiveness analysis. Nevertheless, development of sampling algorithms to maximize the accuracy and efficiency of estimated quality of life has received little consideration to date. This paper presents a method to optimize sampling strategies for estimating quality-adjusted life years. In particular, the authors address the questions of when to sample and how many observations to sample at each sampling time, assuming realistically that the sample variance of quality of life is not constant over time. The method is particularly useful for the design problems researchers face when time or research budget constraints limit the number of individuals that can be surveyed to estimate quality of life. The article focuses on cross-sectional sampling. The method proposed requires some knowledge of survival in the population of interest, the approximate variances in utilities at various points along the curve, and the general shape of the quality-adjusted survival curve. Such data are frequently available from disease registries, the literature, or previous studies.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)431-438
Number of pages8
JournalMedical Decision Making
Volume17
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 27 1997
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Quality-Adjusted Life Years
Quality of Life
Budgets
Cost-Benefit Analysis
Registries
Research Personnel
Research
Population

Keywords

  • Cost-effectiveness
  • Cross-sectional sampling
  • Health-related quality of life
  • Quality-adjusted life years
  • Sampling
  • Survival
  • Utility
  • Variance

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Health Informatics
  • Health Information Management
  • Nursing(all)

Cite this

Optimizing sampling strategies for estimating quality-adjusted life years. / Ramsey, Scott D.; Etzioni, Ruth; Troxel, Andrea; Urban, Nicole.

In: Medical Decision Making, Vol. 17, No. 4, 27.10.1997, p. 431-438.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Ramsey, Scott D. ; Etzioni, Ruth ; Troxel, Andrea ; Urban, Nicole. / Optimizing sampling strategies for estimating quality-adjusted life years. In: Medical Decision Making. 1997 ; Vol. 17, No. 4. pp. 431-438.
@article{26de8e36237a461987c55cd6ef724d4f,
title = "Optimizing sampling strategies for estimating quality-adjusted life years",
abstract = "Accurate estimation of quality of life is critical to cost- effectiveness analysis. Nevertheless, development of sampling algorithms to maximize the accuracy and efficiency of estimated quality of life has received little consideration to date. This paper presents a method to optimize sampling strategies for estimating quality-adjusted life years. In particular, the authors address the questions of when to sample and how many observations to sample at each sampling time, assuming realistically that the sample variance of quality of life is not constant over time. The method is particularly useful for the design problems researchers face when time or research budget constraints limit the number of individuals that can be surveyed to estimate quality of life. The article focuses on cross-sectional sampling. The method proposed requires some knowledge of survival in the population of interest, the approximate variances in utilities at various points along the curve, and the general shape of the quality-adjusted survival curve. Such data are frequently available from disease registries, the literature, or previous studies.",
keywords = "Cost-effectiveness, Cross-sectional sampling, Health-related quality of life, Quality-adjusted life years, Sampling, Survival, Utility, Variance",
author = "Ramsey, {Scott D.} and Ruth Etzioni and Andrea Troxel and Nicole Urban",
year = "1997",
month = "10",
day = "27",
doi = "10.1177/0272989X9701700408",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "17",
pages = "431--438",
journal = "Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making",
issn = "0272-989X",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Optimizing sampling strategies for estimating quality-adjusted life years

AU - Ramsey, Scott D.

AU - Etzioni, Ruth

AU - Troxel, Andrea

AU - Urban, Nicole

PY - 1997/10/27

Y1 - 1997/10/27

N2 - Accurate estimation of quality of life is critical to cost- effectiveness analysis. Nevertheless, development of sampling algorithms to maximize the accuracy and efficiency of estimated quality of life has received little consideration to date. This paper presents a method to optimize sampling strategies for estimating quality-adjusted life years. In particular, the authors address the questions of when to sample and how many observations to sample at each sampling time, assuming realistically that the sample variance of quality of life is not constant over time. The method is particularly useful for the design problems researchers face when time or research budget constraints limit the number of individuals that can be surveyed to estimate quality of life. The article focuses on cross-sectional sampling. The method proposed requires some knowledge of survival in the population of interest, the approximate variances in utilities at various points along the curve, and the general shape of the quality-adjusted survival curve. Such data are frequently available from disease registries, the literature, or previous studies.

AB - Accurate estimation of quality of life is critical to cost- effectiveness analysis. Nevertheless, development of sampling algorithms to maximize the accuracy and efficiency of estimated quality of life has received little consideration to date. This paper presents a method to optimize sampling strategies for estimating quality-adjusted life years. In particular, the authors address the questions of when to sample and how many observations to sample at each sampling time, assuming realistically that the sample variance of quality of life is not constant over time. The method is particularly useful for the design problems researchers face when time or research budget constraints limit the number of individuals that can be surveyed to estimate quality of life. The article focuses on cross-sectional sampling. The method proposed requires some knowledge of survival in the population of interest, the approximate variances in utilities at various points along the curve, and the general shape of the quality-adjusted survival curve. Such data are frequently available from disease registries, the literature, or previous studies.

KW - Cost-effectiveness

KW - Cross-sectional sampling

KW - Health-related quality of life

KW - Quality-adjusted life years

KW - Sampling

KW - Survival

KW - Utility

KW - Variance

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0030754841&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0030754841&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0272989X9701700408

DO - 10.1177/0272989X9701700408

M3 - Article

C2 - 9343801

AN - SCOPUS:0030754841

VL - 17

SP - 431

EP - 438

JO - Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making

JF - Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making

SN - 0272-989X

IS - 4

ER -