Optimal timing of umbilical cord clamping: Is the debate settled? Part 2 of 2: Evidence in preterm and term infants, alternatives, and unanswered questions

Amanda J H Kim, Jamie Warren

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    7 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    In the middle of the 20th century, practices regarding the timing of umbilical cord clamping changed from delaying cord clamping to clamping the umbilical cord soon after delivery of the infant. In the last several years, interest in reviving delayed cord clamping has led to an abundance of literature on the subject. On the basis of recent research, many professional organizations in the fields of obstetrics, midwifery, and pediatrics have started to recommend the use of delayed cord clamping for at least a subset of infants. In part 1 of this 2-part review, we presented the history of the delayed cord clamping debate, discussed the rationale behind the use of delayed cord clamping from a physiologic standpoint, detailed the factors that affect transfusion volume during a delay in cord clamping, and examined the concerns that exist regarding the use of delayed cord clamping. In part 2, we present the evidence surrounding timing of cord clamping for the preterm and term infant and maternal outcomes. Finally, we discuss alternatives to delayed cord clamping and present a summary of unanswered questions on the subject.

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    Pages (from-to)e270-e279
    JournalNeoReviews
    Volume16
    Issue number5
    DOIs
    StatePublished - 2015

    Fingerprint

    Umbilical Cord
    Premature Infants
    Constriction
    Midwifery
    Obstetrics
    History
    Mothers
    Pediatrics

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health

    Cite this

    @article{64ba397d7d234114a42d061c2aebd81c,
    title = "Optimal timing of umbilical cord clamping: Is the debate settled? Part 2 of 2: Evidence in preterm and term infants, alternatives, and unanswered questions",
    abstract = "In the middle of the 20th century, practices regarding the timing of umbilical cord clamping changed from delaying cord clamping to clamping the umbilical cord soon after delivery of the infant. In the last several years, interest in reviving delayed cord clamping has led to an abundance of literature on the subject. On the basis of recent research, many professional organizations in the fields of obstetrics, midwifery, and pediatrics have started to recommend the use of delayed cord clamping for at least a subset of infants. In part 1 of this 2-part review, we presented the history of the delayed cord clamping debate, discussed the rationale behind the use of delayed cord clamping from a physiologic standpoint, detailed the factors that affect transfusion volume during a delay in cord clamping, and examined the concerns that exist regarding the use of delayed cord clamping. In part 2, we present the evidence surrounding timing of cord clamping for the preterm and term infant and maternal outcomes. Finally, we discuss alternatives to delayed cord clamping and present a summary of unanswered questions on the subject.",
    author = "Kim, {Amanda J H} and Jamie Warren",
    year = "2015",
    doi = "10.1542/neo.16-5-e270",
    language = "English (US)",
    volume = "16",
    pages = "e270--e279",
    journal = "NeoReviews",
    issn = "1526-9906",
    publisher = "American Academy of Pediatrics",
    number = "5",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Optimal timing of umbilical cord clamping

    T2 - Is the debate settled? Part 2 of 2: Evidence in preterm and term infants, alternatives, and unanswered questions

    AU - Kim, Amanda J H

    AU - Warren, Jamie

    PY - 2015

    Y1 - 2015

    N2 - In the middle of the 20th century, practices regarding the timing of umbilical cord clamping changed from delaying cord clamping to clamping the umbilical cord soon after delivery of the infant. In the last several years, interest in reviving delayed cord clamping has led to an abundance of literature on the subject. On the basis of recent research, many professional organizations in the fields of obstetrics, midwifery, and pediatrics have started to recommend the use of delayed cord clamping for at least a subset of infants. In part 1 of this 2-part review, we presented the history of the delayed cord clamping debate, discussed the rationale behind the use of delayed cord clamping from a physiologic standpoint, detailed the factors that affect transfusion volume during a delay in cord clamping, and examined the concerns that exist regarding the use of delayed cord clamping. In part 2, we present the evidence surrounding timing of cord clamping for the preterm and term infant and maternal outcomes. Finally, we discuss alternatives to delayed cord clamping and present a summary of unanswered questions on the subject.

    AB - In the middle of the 20th century, practices regarding the timing of umbilical cord clamping changed from delaying cord clamping to clamping the umbilical cord soon after delivery of the infant. In the last several years, interest in reviving delayed cord clamping has led to an abundance of literature on the subject. On the basis of recent research, many professional organizations in the fields of obstetrics, midwifery, and pediatrics have started to recommend the use of delayed cord clamping for at least a subset of infants. In part 1 of this 2-part review, we presented the history of the delayed cord clamping debate, discussed the rationale behind the use of delayed cord clamping from a physiologic standpoint, detailed the factors that affect transfusion volume during a delay in cord clamping, and examined the concerns that exist regarding the use of delayed cord clamping. In part 2, we present the evidence surrounding timing of cord clamping for the preterm and term infant and maternal outcomes. Finally, we discuss alternatives to delayed cord clamping and present a summary of unanswered questions on the subject.

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84946194015&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84946194015&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1542/neo.16-5-e270

    DO - 10.1542/neo.16-5-e270

    M3 - Article

    AN - SCOPUS:84946194015

    VL - 16

    SP - e270-e279

    JO - NeoReviews

    JF - NeoReviews

    SN - 1526-9906

    IS - 5

    ER -