Opportunities and challenges to improving end-of-life care for seriously ill elderly patients: A qualitative study of generalist physicians

Gary S. Winzelberg, Donald L. Patrick, Lorna A. Rhodes, Richard (Rick) Deyo

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

15 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: End-of-life care quality deficiencies have in part been linked to inadequate physician skill in the technical and communication domains of palliative care. Yet few studies have examined physicians' perspectives regarding their experiences caring for patients approaching the end of life. Objective: To understand generalist physicians' perspectives regarding their care of seriously ill elderly patients in order to identify challenges to improving end-of-life communication and decision-making. Design: Qualitative study using in-depth ethnographic interviews. Setting: Puget Sound region of Washington State. Participants: Thirteen community-based generalist physicians who routinely care for elderly patients and represent a range of practice styles and experiences. Results: The physicians described a "revolving door syndrome" in which elderly patients are repeatedly hospitalized with chronic illness exacerbations. Three themes influenced physicians' interactions with "revolving door" patients: (1) physicians' use of decision-making heuristics, characterized as "internal gauges," to promote care consistent with their own values; (2) families' "unreasonable expectations" that patients would return to their previous health after treatment of an acute illness; and (3) families' reluctance to accept end of life decision-making responsibility. Conclusions: Our findings suggest that physician values and physician-family interactions impact decision-making for chronically ill elderly patients. The influence of physicians' internal gauges on end-of-life care can facilitate or hinder use of palliative care as well as decision-making consistent with patients' preferences. Disparate physician and family expectations regarding their division of decision-making responsibility and patients' care outcomes may also affect decision-making. The use of communication strategies that promote alignment of these expectations may improve decision-making quality for incapacitated elderly patients.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)291-299
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of Palliative Medicine
Volume8
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 2005
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Terminal Care
Decision Making
Physicians
Communication
Family Physicians
Palliative Care
Patient Care
Chronic Disease
Patient Preference
Quality of Life
Interviews
Health

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Opportunities and challenges to improving end-of-life care for seriously ill elderly patients : A qualitative study of generalist physicians. / Winzelberg, Gary S.; Patrick, Donald L.; Rhodes, Lorna A.; Deyo, Richard (Rick).

In: Journal of Palliative Medicine, Vol. 8, No. 2, 04.2005, p. 291-299.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{730f8206726943ce8694ee502ef21c45,
title = "Opportunities and challenges to improving end-of-life care for seriously ill elderly patients: A qualitative study of generalist physicians",
abstract = "Background: End-of-life care quality deficiencies have in part been linked to inadequate physician skill in the technical and communication domains of palliative care. Yet few studies have examined physicians' perspectives regarding their experiences caring for patients approaching the end of life. Objective: To understand generalist physicians' perspectives regarding their care of seriously ill elderly patients in order to identify challenges to improving end-of-life communication and decision-making. Design: Qualitative study using in-depth ethnographic interviews. Setting: Puget Sound region of Washington State. Participants: Thirteen community-based generalist physicians who routinely care for elderly patients and represent a range of practice styles and experiences. Results: The physicians described a {"}revolving door syndrome{"} in which elderly patients are repeatedly hospitalized with chronic illness exacerbations. Three themes influenced physicians' interactions with {"}revolving door{"} patients: (1) physicians' use of decision-making heuristics, characterized as {"}internal gauges,{"} to promote care consistent with their own values; (2) families' {"}unreasonable expectations{"} that patients would return to their previous health after treatment of an acute illness; and (3) families' reluctance to accept end of life decision-making responsibility. Conclusions: Our findings suggest that physician values and physician-family interactions impact decision-making for chronically ill elderly patients. The influence of physicians' internal gauges on end-of-life care can facilitate or hinder use of palliative care as well as decision-making consistent with patients' preferences. Disparate physician and family expectations regarding their division of decision-making responsibility and patients' care outcomes may also affect decision-making. The use of communication strategies that promote alignment of these expectations may improve decision-making quality for incapacitated elderly patients.",
author = "Winzelberg, {Gary S.} and Patrick, {Donald L.} and Rhodes, {Lorna A.} and Deyo, {Richard (Rick)}",
year = "2005",
month = "4",
doi = "10.1089/jpm.2005.8.291",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "8",
pages = "291--299",
journal = "Journal of Palliative Medicine",
issn = "1096-6218",
publisher = "Mary Ann Liebert Inc.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Opportunities and challenges to improving end-of-life care for seriously ill elderly patients

T2 - A qualitative study of generalist physicians

AU - Winzelberg, Gary S.

AU - Patrick, Donald L.

AU - Rhodes, Lorna A.

AU - Deyo, Richard (Rick)

PY - 2005/4

Y1 - 2005/4

N2 - Background: End-of-life care quality deficiencies have in part been linked to inadequate physician skill in the technical and communication domains of palliative care. Yet few studies have examined physicians' perspectives regarding their experiences caring for patients approaching the end of life. Objective: To understand generalist physicians' perspectives regarding their care of seriously ill elderly patients in order to identify challenges to improving end-of-life communication and decision-making. Design: Qualitative study using in-depth ethnographic interviews. Setting: Puget Sound region of Washington State. Participants: Thirteen community-based generalist physicians who routinely care for elderly patients and represent a range of practice styles and experiences. Results: The physicians described a "revolving door syndrome" in which elderly patients are repeatedly hospitalized with chronic illness exacerbations. Three themes influenced physicians' interactions with "revolving door" patients: (1) physicians' use of decision-making heuristics, characterized as "internal gauges," to promote care consistent with their own values; (2) families' "unreasonable expectations" that patients would return to their previous health after treatment of an acute illness; and (3) families' reluctance to accept end of life decision-making responsibility. Conclusions: Our findings suggest that physician values and physician-family interactions impact decision-making for chronically ill elderly patients. The influence of physicians' internal gauges on end-of-life care can facilitate or hinder use of palliative care as well as decision-making consistent with patients' preferences. Disparate physician and family expectations regarding their division of decision-making responsibility and patients' care outcomes may also affect decision-making. The use of communication strategies that promote alignment of these expectations may improve decision-making quality for incapacitated elderly patients.

AB - Background: End-of-life care quality deficiencies have in part been linked to inadequate physician skill in the technical and communication domains of palliative care. Yet few studies have examined physicians' perspectives regarding their experiences caring for patients approaching the end of life. Objective: To understand generalist physicians' perspectives regarding their care of seriously ill elderly patients in order to identify challenges to improving end-of-life communication and decision-making. Design: Qualitative study using in-depth ethnographic interviews. Setting: Puget Sound region of Washington State. Participants: Thirteen community-based generalist physicians who routinely care for elderly patients and represent a range of practice styles and experiences. Results: The physicians described a "revolving door syndrome" in which elderly patients are repeatedly hospitalized with chronic illness exacerbations. Three themes influenced physicians' interactions with "revolving door" patients: (1) physicians' use of decision-making heuristics, characterized as "internal gauges," to promote care consistent with their own values; (2) families' "unreasonable expectations" that patients would return to their previous health after treatment of an acute illness; and (3) families' reluctance to accept end of life decision-making responsibility. Conclusions: Our findings suggest that physician values and physician-family interactions impact decision-making for chronically ill elderly patients. The influence of physicians' internal gauges on end-of-life care can facilitate or hinder use of palliative care as well as decision-making consistent with patients' preferences. Disparate physician and family expectations regarding their division of decision-making responsibility and patients' care outcomes may also affect decision-making. The use of communication strategies that promote alignment of these expectations may improve decision-making quality for incapacitated elderly patients.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=18844361881&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=18844361881&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1089/jpm.2005.8.291

DO - 10.1089/jpm.2005.8.291

M3 - Article

C2 - 15890040

AN - SCOPUS:18844361881

VL - 8

SP - 291

EP - 299

JO - Journal of Palliative Medicine

JF - Journal of Palliative Medicine

SN - 1096-6218

IS - 2

ER -