Open versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy

an initial analysis.

B. F. Gilchrist, Angelo Vlessis, G. A. Kay, K. Swartz, D. Dennis

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

14 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is a new procedure in the armamentarium of the general surgeon. Its utility was investigated by comparison to open cholecystectomy in terms of procedure time, complications, hospital stay, and total hospital cost. Procedure time was approximately 200% longer with a higher incidence of intraoperative stone and bile spillage (17%) in the laparoscopic group. Hospital stay was reduced by 60% using the laparoscopic technique. No difference in total hospital cost existed between the two groups. The learning curve had an affect on hospital costs, which will decrease as more experience is gained with this procedure. Although laparoscopic cholecystectomy, at least initially, has no cost advantage over open cholecystectomy, laparoscopic cholecystectomy may be preferred by patients seeking shorter hospital stays and presumably shorter total recovery time.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)193-196
Number of pages4
JournalJournal of Laparoendoscopic Surgery
Volume1
Issue number4
StatePublished - Aug 1991
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
Hospital Costs
Length of Stay
Cholecystectomy
Learning Curve
Bile
Costs and Cost Analysis
Incidence

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Cite this

Gilchrist, B. F., Vlessis, A., Kay, G. A., Swartz, K., & Dennis, D. (1991). Open versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy: an initial analysis. Journal of Laparoendoscopic Surgery, 1(4), 193-196.

Open versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy : an initial analysis. / Gilchrist, B. F.; Vlessis, Angelo; Kay, G. A.; Swartz, K.; Dennis, D.

In: Journal of Laparoendoscopic Surgery, Vol. 1, No. 4, 08.1991, p. 193-196.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Gilchrist, BF, Vlessis, A, Kay, GA, Swartz, K & Dennis, D 1991, 'Open versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy: an initial analysis.', Journal of Laparoendoscopic Surgery, vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 193-196.
Gilchrist BF, Vlessis A, Kay GA, Swartz K, Dennis D. Open versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy: an initial analysis. Journal of Laparoendoscopic Surgery. 1991 Aug;1(4):193-196.
Gilchrist, B. F. ; Vlessis, Angelo ; Kay, G. A. ; Swartz, K. ; Dennis, D. / Open versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy : an initial analysis. In: Journal of Laparoendoscopic Surgery. 1991 ; Vol. 1, No. 4. pp. 193-196.
@article{d562030dc8194d15a9894a97cd15d344,
title = "Open versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy: an initial analysis.",
abstract = "Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is a new procedure in the armamentarium of the general surgeon. Its utility was investigated by comparison to open cholecystectomy in terms of procedure time, complications, hospital stay, and total hospital cost. Procedure time was approximately 200{\%} longer with a higher incidence of intraoperative stone and bile spillage (17{\%}) in the laparoscopic group. Hospital stay was reduced by 60{\%} using the laparoscopic technique. No difference in total hospital cost existed between the two groups. The learning curve had an affect on hospital costs, which will decrease as more experience is gained with this procedure. Although laparoscopic cholecystectomy, at least initially, has no cost advantage over open cholecystectomy, laparoscopic cholecystectomy may be preferred by patients seeking shorter hospital stays and presumably shorter total recovery time.",
author = "Gilchrist, {B. F.} and Angelo Vlessis and Kay, {G. A.} and K. Swartz and D. Dennis",
year = "1991",
month = "8",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "1",
pages = "193--196",
journal = "Journal of Laparoendoscopic Surgery",
issn = "1052-3901",
publisher = "Mary Ann Liebert Inc.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Open versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy

T2 - an initial analysis.

AU - Gilchrist, B. F.

AU - Vlessis, Angelo

AU - Kay, G. A.

AU - Swartz, K.

AU - Dennis, D.

PY - 1991/8

Y1 - 1991/8

N2 - Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is a new procedure in the armamentarium of the general surgeon. Its utility was investigated by comparison to open cholecystectomy in terms of procedure time, complications, hospital stay, and total hospital cost. Procedure time was approximately 200% longer with a higher incidence of intraoperative stone and bile spillage (17%) in the laparoscopic group. Hospital stay was reduced by 60% using the laparoscopic technique. No difference in total hospital cost existed between the two groups. The learning curve had an affect on hospital costs, which will decrease as more experience is gained with this procedure. Although laparoscopic cholecystectomy, at least initially, has no cost advantage over open cholecystectomy, laparoscopic cholecystectomy may be preferred by patients seeking shorter hospital stays and presumably shorter total recovery time.

AB - Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is a new procedure in the armamentarium of the general surgeon. Its utility was investigated by comparison to open cholecystectomy in terms of procedure time, complications, hospital stay, and total hospital cost. Procedure time was approximately 200% longer with a higher incidence of intraoperative stone and bile spillage (17%) in the laparoscopic group. Hospital stay was reduced by 60% using the laparoscopic technique. No difference in total hospital cost existed between the two groups. The learning curve had an affect on hospital costs, which will decrease as more experience is gained with this procedure. Although laparoscopic cholecystectomy, at least initially, has no cost advantage over open cholecystectomy, laparoscopic cholecystectomy may be preferred by patients seeking shorter hospital stays and presumably shorter total recovery time.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0026212085&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0026212085&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 1

SP - 193

EP - 196

JO - Journal of Laparoendoscopic Surgery

JF - Journal of Laparoendoscopic Surgery

SN - 1052-3901

IS - 4

ER -