TY - JOUR
T1 - Online survey of nursing journal peer reviewers
T2 - Indicators of quality in manuscripts
AU - Dougherty, Molly C.
AU - Freda, Margaret C.
AU - Kearney, Margaret H.
AU - Baggs, Judith Gedney
AU - Broome, Marion
PY - 2011/6
Y1 - 2011/6
N2 - Nursing journal peer reviewers (N = 1,675) completed a 69-item online survey that assessed their views on manuscripts' contributions to nursing, priorities in writing reviews, use of journal impact factor, and other areas related to indicators of quality. They reported using contribution to knowledge or research evidence, topic of current interest, and newly emerging area as indicators of a manuscript's contribution to nursing. In writing their reviews, research rigor and clinical relevance of the manuscript were high priorities. Those familiar with the concept of impact factor were significantly more often not nurses; not United States residents; involved in research; and most often reviewed for journals that published only research or a scholarly mix of research, reviews, policy, and theory. When judging a paper's contribution, nursing journal peer reviewers weigh both research and clinical interests. Most reviewers do not use impact factors and place clinical considerations ahead of impact factors.
AB - Nursing journal peer reviewers (N = 1,675) completed a 69-item online survey that assessed their views on manuscripts' contributions to nursing, priorities in writing reviews, use of journal impact factor, and other areas related to indicators of quality. They reported using contribution to knowledge or research evidence, topic of current interest, and newly emerging area as indicators of a manuscript's contribution to nursing. In writing their reviews, research rigor and clinical relevance of the manuscript were high priorities. Those familiar with the concept of impact factor were significantly more often not nurses; not United States residents; involved in research; and most often reviewed for journals that published only research or a scholarly mix of research, reviews, policy, and theory. When judging a paper's contribution, nursing journal peer reviewers weigh both research and clinical interests. Most reviewers do not use impact factors and place clinical considerations ahead of impact factors.
KW - journal impact factor
KW - nursing research
KW - peer review
KW - publishing
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79955548010&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79955548010&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1177/0193945910385715
DO - 10.1177/0193945910385715
M3 - Review article
C2 - 21078915
AN - SCOPUS:79955548010
SN - 0193-9459
VL - 33
SP - 506
EP - 521
JO - Western journal of nursing research
JF - Western journal of nursing research
IS - 4
ER -