Online survey of nursing journal peer reviewers

Indicators of quality in manuscripts

Molly C. Dougherty, Margaret C. Freda, Margaret H. Kearney, Judith Baggs, Marion Broome

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    6 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Nursing journal peer reviewers (N = 1,675) completed a 69-item online survey that assessed their views on manuscripts' contributions to nursing, priorities in writing reviews, use of journal impact factor, and other areas related to indicators of quality. They reported using contribution to knowledge or research evidence, topic of current interest, and newly emerging area as indicators of a manuscript's contribution to nursing. In writing their reviews, research rigor and clinical relevance of the manuscript were high priorities. Those familiar with the concept of impact factor were significantly more often not nurses; not United States residents; involved in research; and most often reviewed for journals that published only research or a scholarly mix of research, reviews, policy, and theory. When judging a paper's contribution, nursing journal peer reviewers weigh both research and clinical interests. Most reviewers do not use impact factors and place clinical considerations ahead of impact factors.

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    Pages (from-to)506-521
    Number of pages16
    JournalWestern Journal of Nursing Research
    Volume33
    Issue number4
    DOIs
    StatePublished - Jun 2011

    Fingerprint

    Manuscripts
    Nursing
    Research
    Journal Impact Factor
    Surveys and Questionnaires
    Nurses

    Keywords

    • journal impact factor
    • nursing research
    • peer review
    • publishing

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Nursing(all)

    Cite this

    Online survey of nursing journal peer reviewers : Indicators of quality in manuscripts. / Dougherty, Molly C.; Freda, Margaret C.; Kearney, Margaret H.; Baggs, Judith; Broome, Marion.

    In: Western Journal of Nursing Research, Vol. 33, No. 4, 06.2011, p. 506-521.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Dougherty, Molly C. ; Freda, Margaret C. ; Kearney, Margaret H. ; Baggs, Judith ; Broome, Marion. / Online survey of nursing journal peer reviewers : Indicators of quality in manuscripts. In: Western Journal of Nursing Research. 2011 ; Vol. 33, No. 4. pp. 506-521.
    @article{fc61e0dbf8124789b931752dd03ffaae,
    title = "Online survey of nursing journal peer reviewers: Indicators of quality in manuscripts",
    abstract = "Nursing journal peer reviewers (N = 1,675) completed a 69-item online survey that assessed their views on manuscripts' contributions to nursing, priorities in writing reviews, use of journal impact factor, and other areas related to indicators of quality. They reported using contribution to knowledge or research evidence, topic of current interest, and newly emerging area as indicators of a manuscript's contribution to nursing. In writing their reviews, research rigor and clinical relevance of the manuscript were high priorities. Those familiar with the concept of impact factor were significantly more often not nurses; not United States residents; involved in research; and most often reviewed for journals that published only research or a scholarly mix of research, reviews, policy, and theory. When judging a paper's contribution, nursing journal peer reviewers weigh both research and clinical interests. Most reviewers do not use impact factors and place clinical considerations ahead of impact factors.",
    keywords = "journal impact factor, nursing research, peer review, publishing",
    author = "Dougherty, {Molly C.} and Freda, {Margaret C.} and Kearney, {Margaret H.} and Judith Baggs and Marion Broome",
    year = "2011",
    month = "6",
    doi = "10.1177/0193945910385715",
    language = "English (US)",
    volume = "33",
    pages = "506--521",
    journal = "Western Journal of Nursing Research",
    issn = "0193-9459",
    publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
    number = "4",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Online survey of nursing journal peer reviewers

    T2 - Indicators of quality in manuscripts

    AU - Dougherty, Molly C.

    AU - Freda, Margaret C.

    AU - Kearney, Margaret H.

    AU - Baggs, Judith

    AU - Broome, Marion

    PY - 2011/6

    Y1 - 2011/6

    N2 - Nursing journal peer reviewers (N = 1,675) completed a 69-item online survey that assessed their views on manuscripts' contributions to nursing, priorities in writing reviews, use of journal impact factor, and other areas related to indicators of quality. They reported using contribution to knowledge or research evidence, topic of current interest, and newly emerging area as indicators of a manuscript's contribution to nursing. In writing their reviews, research rigor and clinical relevance of the manuscript were high priorities. Those familiar with the concept of impact factor were significantly more often not nurses; not United States residents; involved in research; and most often reviewed for journals that published only research or a scholarly mix of research, reviews, policy, and theory. When judging a paper's contribution, nursing journal peer reviewers weigh both research and clinical interests. Most reviewers do not use impact factors and place clinical considerations ahead of impact factors.

    AB - Nursing journal peer reviewers (N = 1,675) completed a 69-item online survey that assessed their views on manuscripts' contributions to nursing, priorities in writing reviews, use of journal impact factor, and other areas related to indicators of quality. They reported using contribution to knowledge or research evidence, topic of current interest, and newly emerging area as indicators of a manuscript's contribution to nursing. In writing their reviews, research rigor and clinical relevance of the manuscript were high priorities. Those familiar with the concept of impact factor were significantly more often not nurses; not United States residents; involved in research; and most often reviewed for journals that published only research or a scholarly mix of research, reviews, policy, and theory. When judging a paper's contribution, nursing journal peer reviewers weigh both research and clinical interests. Most reviewers do not use impact factors and place clinical considerations ahead of impact factors.

    KW - journal impact factor

    KW - nursing research

    KW - peer review

    KW - publishing

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79955548010&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79955548010&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1177/0193945910385715

    DO - 10.1177/0193945910385715

    M3 - Article

    VL - 33

    SP - 506

    EP - 521

    JO - Western Journal of Nursing Research

    JF - Western Journal of Nursing Research

    SN - 0193-9459

    IS - 4

    ER -