One big happy family? Interdisciplinary variation in job satisfaction among hospice providers

David J. Casarett, Carol Spence, Matthew Haskins, Joan Teno

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Job satisfaction is particularly important in the hospice industry, given the emotional and interpersonal challenges that hospice staff face in providing care to patients near the end of life and their families. However, little is known about the job satisfaction of hospice providers, or about variation in satisfaction among disciplines. Methods: Staff at participating hospices completed the Survey of Team Attitudes and Relationships (STAR) using an online user interface. The STAR has 6 domains that comprise 45 items. Results: Results were submitted for 8,495 staff from 177 hospices in 41 states. The mean total score was 28 on a 0-100 scale (range, 0-100; interquartile range, 8-45) and hospice-level scores ranged from 15 to 44. Nonclinical staff (n=3260) and clinical staff (n=5235) had similar total scores (28 for both). Among clinical staff, in a mixed effects model adjusting for individual and hospice characteristics, physicians had the highest total scores (adjusted mean 42; 95% confidence interval: 35-46) compared to chaplains (30; 28-33), bereavement coordinators (27; 24-30), nurses' aides (29; 27-33); nurses (26; 28-33), and social workers (25; 23-26). Conclusions: There is significant variation in job satisfaction both among hospices and disciplines.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)913-917
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of palliative medicine
Volume14
Issue number8
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 1 2011
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Hospices
Job Satisfaction
Nurses' Aides
Clergy
Bereavement
Patient Care
Industry
Nurses
Confidence Intervals
Physicians

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine
  • Nursing(all)

Cite this

One big happy family? Interdisciplinary variation in job satisfaction among hospice providers. / Casarett, David J.; Spence, Carol; Haskins, Matthew; Teno, Joan.

In: Journal of palliative medicine, Vol. 14, No. 8, 01.08.2011, p. 913-917.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Casarett, David J. ; Spence, Carol ; Haskins, Matthew ; Teno, Joan. / One big happy family? Interdisciplinary variation in job satisfaction among hospice providers. In: Journal of palliative medicine. 2011 ; Vol. 14, No. 8. pp. 913-917.
@article{d4cdb95350404cf3a6d07b3a465ebcd4,
title = "One big happy family? Interdisciplinary variation in job satisfaction among hospice providers",
abstract = "Background: Job satisfaction is particularly important in the hospice industry, given the emotional and interpersonal challenges that hospice staff face in providing care to patients near the end of life and their families. However, little is known about the job satisfaction of hospice providers, or about variation in satisfaction among disciplines. Methods: Staff at participating hospices completed the Survey of Team Attitudes and Relationships (STAR) using an online user interface. The STAR has 6 domains that comprise 45 items. Results: Results were submitted for 8,495 staff from 177 hospices in 41 states. The mean total score was 28 on a 0-100 scale (range, 0-100; interquartile range, 8-45) and hospice-level scores ranged from 15 to 44. Nonclinical staff (n=3260) and clinical staff (n=5235) had similar total scores (28 for both). Among clinical staff, in a mixed effects model adjusting for individual and hospice characteristics, physicians had the highest total scores (adjusted mean 42; 95{\%} confidence interval: 35-46) compared to chaplains (30; 28-33), bereavement coordinators (27; 24-30), nurses' aides (29; 27-33); nurses (26; 28-33), and social workers (25; 23-26). Conclusions: There is significant variation in job satisfaction both among hospices and disciplines.",
author = "Casarett, {David J.} and Carol Spence and Matthew Haskins and Joan Teno",
year = "2011",
month = "8",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1089/jpm.2011.0057",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "14",
pages = "913--917",
journal = "Journal of Palliative Medicine",
issn = "1096-6218",
publisher = "Mary Ann Liebert Inc.",
number = "8",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - One big happy family? Interdisciplinary variation in job satisfaction among hospice providers

AU - Casarett, David J.

AU - Spence, Carol

AU - Haskins, Matthew

AU - Teno, Joan

PY - 2011/8/1

Y1 - 2011/8/1

N2 - Background: Job satisfaction is particularly important in the hospice industry, given the emotional and interpersonal challenges that hospice staff face in providing care to patients near the end of life and their families. However, little is known about the job satisfaction of hospice providers, or about variation in satisfaction among disciplines. Methods: Staff at participating hospices completed the Survey of Team Attitudes and Relationships (STAR) using an online user interface. The STAR has 6 domains that comprise 45 items. Results: Results were submitted for 8,495 staff from 177 hospices in 41 states. The mean total score was 28 on a 0-100 scale (range, 0-100; interquartile range, 8-45) and hospice-level scores ranged from 15 to 44. Nonclinical staff (n=3260) and clinical staff (n=5235) had similar total scores (28 for both). Among clinical staff, in a mixed effects model adjusting for individual and hospice characteristics, physicians had the highest total scores (adjusted mean 42; 95% confidence interval: 35-46) compared to chaplains (30; 28-33), bereavement coordinators (27; 24-30), nurses' aides (29; 27-33); nurses (26; 28-33), and social workers (25; 23-26). Conclusions: There is significant variation in job satisfaction both among hospices and disciplines.

AB - Background: Job satisfaction is particularly important in the hospice industry, given the emotional and interpersonal challenges that hospice staff face in providing care to patients near the end of life and their families. However, little is known about the job satisfaction of hospice providers, or about variation in satisfaction among disciplines. Methods: Staff at participating hospices completed the Survey of Team Attitudes and Relationships (STAR) using an online user interface. The STAR has 6 domains that comprise 45 items. Results: Results were submitted for 8,495 staff from 177 hospices in 41 states. The mean total score was 28 on a 0-100 scale (range, 0-100; interquartile range, 8-45) and hospice-level scores ranged from 15 to 44. Nonclinical staff (n=3260) and clinical staff (n=5235) had similar total scores (28 for both). Among clinical staff, in a mixed effects model adjusting for individual and hospice characteristics, physicians had the highest total scores (adjusted mean 42; 95% confidence interval: 35-46) compared to chaplains (30; 28-33), bereavement coordinators (27; 24-30), nurses' aides (29; 27-33); nurses (26; 28-33), and social workers (25; 23-26). Conclusions: There is significant variation in job satisfaction both among hospices and disciplines.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79961221191&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79961221191&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1089/jpm.2011.0057

DO - 10.1089/jpm.2011.0057

M3 - Review article

C2 - 21711122

AN - SCOPUS:79961221191

VL - 14

SP - 913

EP - 917

JO - Journal of Palliative Medicine

JF - Journal of Palliative Medicine

SN - 1096-6218

IS - 8

ER -