On-field predictors of neuropsychological and symptom deficit following sports-related concussion

Michael W. Collins, Grant L. Iverson, Mark R. Lovell, Douglas McKeag, John Norwig, Joseph Maroon

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

238 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: Investigate the relationship between on-field markers of concussion severity and postinjury neuropsychological and symptom presentation in an athlete-specific population. Design: Case control study. Setting: Multicenter analysis of high school and college athletes. Participants: A total of 78 athletes sustaining sports-related concussion were selected from a larger sample of 139 concussed athletes. Assessment of Predictor Variables: On-field presence of disorientation, posttraumatic amnesia, retrograde amnesia, and loss of consciousness. Main Outcome Measures: ImPACT, a computerized neuropsychological test battery, was administered pre-season and, on average, 2 days postinjury. Good postinjury presentation (n = 44) was defined as no measurable change, relative to baseline, in terms of both ImPACT memory and symptom composite scores. Poor presentation (n = 34) was defined as a 10-point increase in symptom reporting and 10-point decrease in memory functioning (exceeding the 80% confidence interval for measurement error on ImPACT). Athletes failing to meet good or poor selection criteria (n = 61) were not included in the analysis. Results: Odds ratios revealed that athletes demonstrating poor presentation at 2 days postinjury were over 10 times more likely (P < 0.001) to have exhibited retrograde amnesia following concussive injury when compared with athletes exhibiting good presentation. Similarly, athletes with poor presentation were over 4 times more likely (P < 0.013) to have exhibited posttraumatic amnesia and at least 5 minutes of mental status change. There were no differences between good and poor presentation groups in terms of on-field loss of consciousness. Conclusions: The presence of amnesia, not loss of consciousness, appears predictive of symptom and neurocognitive deficits following concussion in athletes. Athletes presenting with on-field amnesia should undergo comprehensive and individualized assessment prior to returning to sport participation. Continued refinement of sports concussion grading scales is warranted in lieu of consistent findings that brief loss of consciousness is not predictive of concussion injury severity.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)222-229
Number of pages8
JournalClinical Journal of Sport Medicine
Volume13
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 1 2003
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Athletes
Sports
Amnesia
Unconsciousness
Retrograde Amnesia
Confusion
Neuropsychological Tests
Wounds and Injuries
Patient Selection
Case-Control Studies
Odds Ratio
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Confidence Intervals

Keywords

  • Concussion
  • Grading systems
  • ImPACT
  • Loss of consciousness
  • Severity
  • Sports

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation

Cite this

On-field predictors of neuropsychological and symptom deficit following sports-related concussion. / Collins, Michael W.; Iverson, Grant L.; Lovell, Mark R.; McKeag, Douglas; Norwig, John; Maroon, Joseph.

In: Clinical Journal of Sport Medicine, Vol. 13, No. 4, 01.07.2003, p. 222-229.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Collins, Michael W. ; Iverson, Grant L. ; Lovell, Mark R. ; McKeag, Douglas ; Norwig, John ; Maroon, Joseph. / On-field predictors of neuropsychological and symptom deficit following sports-related concussion. In: Clinical Journal of Sport Medicine. 2003 ; Vol. 13, No. 4. pp. 222-229.
@article{38cde517b52949e68e1fd472dbd20513,
title = "On-field predictors of neuropsychological and symptom deficit following sports-related concussion",
abstract = "Objective: Investigate the relationship between on-field markers of concussion severity and postinjury neuropsychological and symptom presentation in an athlete-specific population. Design: Case control study. Setting: Multicenter analysis of high school and college athletes. Participants: A total of 78 athletes sustaining sports-related concussion were selected from a larger sample of 139 concussed athletes. Assessment of Predictor Variables: On-field presence of disorientation, posttraumatic amnesia, retrograde amnesia, and loss of consciousness. Main Outcome Measures: ImPACT, a computerized neuropsychological test battery, was administered pre-season and, on average, 2 days postinjury. Good postinjury presentation (n = 44) was defined as no measurable change, relative to baseline, in terms of both ImPACT memory and symptom composite scores. Poor presentation (n = 34) was defined as a 10-point increase in symptom reporting and 10-point decrease in memory functioning (exceeding the 80{\%} confidence interval for measurement error on ImPACT). Athletes failing to meet good or poor selection criteria (n = 61) were not included in the analysis. Results: Odds ratios revealed that athletes demonstrating poor presentation at 2 days postinjury were over 10 times more likely (P < 0.001) to have exhibited retrograde amnesia following concussive injury when compared with athletes exhibiting good presentation. Similarly, athletes with poor presentation were over 4 times more likely (P < 0.013) to have exhibited posttraumatic amnesia and at least 5 minutes of mental status change. There were no differences between good and poor presentation groups in terms of on-field loss of consciousness. Conclusions: The presence of amnesia, not loss of consciousness, appears predictive of symptom and neurocognitive deficits following concussion in athletes. Athletes presenting with on-field amnesia should undergo comprehensive and individualized assessment prior to returning to sport participation. Continued refinement of sports concussion grading scales is warranted in lieu of consistent findings that brief loss of consciousness is not predictive of concussion injury severity.",
keywords = "Concussion, Grading systems, ImPACT, Loss of consciousness, Severity, Sports",
author = "Collins, {Michael W.} and Iverson, {Grant L.} and Lovell, {Mark R.} and Douglas McKeag and John Norwig and Joseph Maroon",
year = "2003",
month = "7",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1097/00042752-200307000-00005",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "13",
pages = "222--229",
journal = "Clinical Journal of Sport Medicine",
issn = "1050-642X",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - On-field predictors of neuropsychological and symptom deficit following sports-related concussion

AU - Collins, Michael W.

AU - Iverson, Grant L.

AU - Lovell, Mark R.

AU - McKeag, Douglas

AU - Norwig, John

AU - Maroon, Joseph

PY - 2003/7/1

Y1 - 2003/7/1

N2 - Objective: Investigate the relationship between on-field markers of concussion severity and postinjury neuropsychological and symptom presentation in an athlete-specific population. Design: Case control study. Setting: Multicenter analysis of high school and college athletes. Participants: A total of 78 athletes sustaining sports-related concussion were selected from a larger sample of 139 concussed athletes. Assessment of Predictor Variables: On-field presence of disorientation, posttraumatic amnesia, retrograde amnesia, and loss of consciousness. Main Outcome Measures: ImPACT, a computerized neuropsychological test battery, was administered pre-season and, on average, 2 days postinjury. Good postinjury presentation (n = 44) was defined as no measurable change, relative to baseline, in terms of both ImPACT memory and symptom composite scores. Poor presentation (n = 34) was defined as a 10-point increase in symptom reporting and 10-point decrease in memory functioning (exceeding the 80% confidence interval for measurement error on ImPACT). Athletes failing to meet good or poor selection criteria (n = 61) were not included in the analysis. Results: Odds ratios revealed that athletes demonstrating poor presentation at 2 days postinjury were over 10 times more likely (P < 0.001) to have exhibited retrograde amnesia following concussive injury when compared with athletes exhibiting good presentation. Similarly, athletes with poor presentation were over 4 times more likely (P < 0.013) to have exhibited posttraumatic amnesia and at least 5 minutes of mental status change. There were no differences between good and poor presentation groups in terms of on-field loss of consciousness. Conclusions: The presence of amnesia, not loss of consciousness, appears predictive of symptom and neurocognitive deficits following concussion in athletes. Athletes presenting with on-field amnesia should undergo comprehensive and individualized assessment prior to returning to sport participation. Continued refinement of sports concussion grading scales is warranted in lieu of consistent findings that brief loss of consciousness is not predictive of concussion injury severity.

AB - Objective: Investigate the relationship between on-field markers of concussion severity and postinjury neuropsychological and symptom presentation in an athlete-specific population. Design: Case control study. Setting: Multicenter analysis of high school and college athletes. Participants: A total of 78 athletes sustaining sports-related concussion were selected from a larger sample of 139 concussed athletes. Assessment of Predictor Variables: On-field presence of disorientation, posttraumatic amnesia, retrograde amnesia, and loss of consciousness. Main Outcome Measures: ImPACT, a computerized neuropsychological test battery, was administered pre-season and, on average, 2 days postinjury. Good postinjury presentation (n = 44) was defined as no measurable change, relative to baseline, in terms of both ImPACT memory and symptom composite scores. Poor presentation (n = 34) was defined as a 10-point increase in symptom reporting and 10-point decrease in memory functioning (exceeding the 80% confidence interval for measurement error on ImPACT). Athletes failing to meet good or poor selection criteria (n = 61) were not included in the analysis. Results: Odds ratios revealed that athletes demonstrating poor presentation at 2 days postinjury were over 10 times more likely (P < 0.001) to have exhibited retrograde amnesia following concussive injury when compared with athletes exhibiting good presentation. Similarly, athletes with poor presentation were over 4 times more likely (P < 0.013) to have exhibited posttraumatic amnesia and at least 5 minutes of mental status change. There were no differences between good and poor presentation groups in terms of on-field loss of consciousness. Conclusions: The presence of amnesia, not loss of consciousness, appears predictive of symptom and neurocognitive deficits following concussion in athletes. Athletes presenting with on-field amnesia should undergo comprehensive and individualized assessment prior to returning to sport participation. Continued refinement of sports concussion grading scales is warranted in lieu of consistent findings that brief loss of consciousness is not predictive of concussion injury severity.

KW - Concussion

KW - Grading systems

KW - ImPACT

KW - Loss of consciousness

KW - Severity

KW - Sports

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0041672198&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0041672198&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/00042752-200307000-00005

DO - 10.1097/00042752-200307000-00005

M3 - Article

C2 - 12855924

AN - SCOPUS:0041672198

VL - 13

SP - 222

EP - 229

JO - Clinical Journal of Sport Medicine

JF - Clinical Journal of Sport Medicine

SN - 1050-642X

IS - 4

ER -