TY - JOUR
T1 - Observation unit use among patients with cancer following emergency department visits
T2 - Results of a multicenter prospective cohort from CONCERN
AU - Klotz, Adam D.
AU - Caterino, Jeffrey M.
AU - Durham, Danielle
AU - Felipe Rico, Juan
AU - Pallin, Daniel J.
AU - Grudzen, Corita R.
AU - McNaughton, Caroline
AU - Marcelin, Isabelle
AU - Abar, Beau
AU - Adler, David
AU - Bastani, Aveh
AU - Bernstein, Steven L.
AU - Bischof, Jason J.
AU - Coyne, Christopher J.
AU - Henning, Daniel J.
AU - Hudson, Matthew F.
AU - Lyman, Gary H.
AU - Madsen, Troy E.
AU - Reyes-Gibby, Cielito C.
AU - Ryan, Richard J.
AU - Shapiro, Nathan I.
AU - Swor, Robert
AU - Thomas, Charles R.
AU - Venkat, Arvind
AU - Wilson, Jason
AU - Jim Yeung, Sai Ching
AU - Yilmaz, Sule
AU - Stutman, Robin
AU - Baugh, Christopher W.
N1 - Funding Information:
Dr. Yeung was a member of an expert panel for Celgene, Inc. Dr. Yeung had funding support from Bristol‐Myer Squibb, Inc. and DepoMed, Inc. (now Assertio Therapeutics, Inc.). Dr. Bischoff receives funding support from Beckman Coulter. Dr. Baugh is a speaker for Roche Diagnostics and advisory board member for Salix Pharmaceuticals and AcelRx Pharmaceuticals.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 by the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine
PY - 2022/2
Y1 - 2022/2
N2 - Purpose: Emergency department (ED) visits by patients with cancer frequently end in hospitalization. As concerns about ED and hospital crowding increase, observation unit care may be an important strategy to deliver safe and efficient treatment for eligible patients. In this investigation, we compared the prevalence and clinical characteristics of cancer patients who received observation unit care with those who were admitted to the hospital from the ED. Methods: We performed a multicenter prospective cohort study of patients with cancer presenting to an ED affiliated with one of 18 hospitals of the Comprehensive Oncologic Emergency Research Network (CONCERN) between March 1, 2016 and January 30, 2017. We compared patient characteristics with the prevalence of observation unit care usage, hospital admission, and length of stay. Results: Of 1051 enrolled patients, 596 (56.7%) were admitted as inpatients, and 72 (6.9%) were placed in an observation unit. For patients admitted as inpatients, 23.7% had a length of stay ≤2 days. The conversion rate from observation to inpatient was 17.1% (95% CI 14.6–19.4) among those receiving care in an observation unit. The average observation unit length of stay was 14.7 h. Patient factors associated ED disposition to observation unit care were female gender and low Charlson Comorbidity Index. Conclusion: In this multicenter prospective cohort study, the discrepancy between observation unit care use and short inpatient hospitalization may represent underutilization of this resource and a target for process change.
AB - Purpose: Emergency department (ED) visits by patients with cancer frequently end in hospitalization. As concerns about ED and hospital crowding increase, observation unit care may be an important strategy to deliver safe and efficient treatment for eligible patients. In this investigation, we compared the prevalence and clinical characteristics of cancer patients who received observation unit care with those who were admitted to the hospital from the ED. Methods: We performed a multicenter prospective cohort study of patients with cancer presenting to an ED affiliated with one of 18 hospitals of the Comprehensive Oncologic Emergency Research Network (CONCERN) between March 1, 2016 and January 30, 2017. We compared patient characteristics with the prevalence of observation unit care usage, hospital admission, and length of stay. Results: Of 1051 enrolled patients, 596 (56.7%) were admitted as inpatients, and 72 (6.9%) were placed in an observation unit. For patients admitted as inpatients, 23.7% had a length of stay ≤2 days. The conversion rate from observation to inpatient was 17.1% (95% CI 14.6–19.4) among those receiving care in an observation unit. The average observation unit length of stay was 14.7 h. Patient factors associated ED disposition to observation unit care were female gender and low Charlson Comorbidity Index. Conclusion: In this multicenter prospective cohort study, the discrepancy between observation unit care use and short inpatient hospitalization may represent underutilization of this resource and a target for process change.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85120492702&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85120492702&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/acem.14392
DO - 10.1111/acem.14392
M3 - Article
C2 - 34811858
AN - SCOPUS:85120492702
SN - 1069-6563
VL - 29
SP - 174
EP - 183
JO - Academic Emergency Medicine
JF - Academic Emergency Medicine
IS - 2
ER -