Objective versus subjective outcomes assessment in rhinology

Michael G. Stewart, Timothy Smith

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

53 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Prior studies on the relationship between computed tomography scan findings and patient-based quality of life in chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) have found very low correlations. Whereas surprising, similar findings have been noted in other diseases. Methods: We performed a cross-sectional analysis of the association between objective and subjective findings in nasal septal deformity and a systematic review and synthesis of the literature on CRS and other diseases. Results: We found no association between objective anatomic findings and subjective symptoms in nasal obstruction (R = 0.03; Kruskal-Wallis test, p = 0.97). Multiple studies in CRS and other diseases - sleep apnea, hearing loss, asthma, etc. - have found similarly low correlations between objective and subjective testing. Conclusion: For nasal septal deviation and CRS, the patient's subjective perception of disease severity has, at best, a very weak association with objective assessment of severity. Patient-based outcomes assessment remains important; these instruments apparently quantify an aspect of disease not detected by objective testing.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)529-535
Number of pages7
JournalAmerican Journal of Rhinology
Volume19
Issue number5
StatePublished - Sep 2005
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Nose
Patient Outcome Assessment
Nasal Obstruction
Sleep Apnea Syndromes
Hearing Loss
Asthma
Cross-Sectional Studies
Tomography
Quality of Life

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Otorhinolaryngology

Cite this

Objective versus subjective outcomes assessment in rhinology. / Stewart, Michael G.; Smith, Timothy.

In: American Journal of Rhinology, Vol. 19, No. 5, 09.2005, p. 529-535.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{e9d2693624874700b9d3e874ad6b499c,
title = "Objective versus subjective outcomes assessment in rhinology",
abstract = "Background: Prior studies on the relationship between computed tomography scan findings and patient-based quality of life in chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) have found very low correlations. Whereas surprising, similar findings have been noted in other diseases. Methods: We performed a cross-sectional analysis of the association between objective and subjective findings in nasal septal deformity and a systematic review and synthesis of the literature on CRS and other diseases. Results: We found no association between objective anatomic findings and subjective symptoms in nasal obstruction (R = 0.03; Kruskal-Wallis test, p = 0.97). Multiple studies in CRS and other diseases - sleep apnea, hearing loss, asthma, etc. - have found similarly low correlations between objective and subjective testing. Conclusion: For nasal septal deviation and CRS, the patient's subjective perception of disease severity has, at best, a very weak association with objective assessment of severity. Patient-based outcomes assessment remains important; these instruments apparently quantify an aspect of disease not detected by objective testing.",
author = "Stewart, {Michael G.} and Timothy Smith",
year = "2005",
month = "9",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "19",
pages = "529--535",
journal = "American Journal of Rhinology and Allergy",
issn = "1945-8924",
publisher = "OceanSide Publications Inc.",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Objective versus subjective outcomes assessment in rhinology

AU - Stewart, Michael G.

AU - Smith, Timothy

PY - 2005/9

Y1 - 2005/9

N2 - Background: Prior studies on the relationship between computed tomography scan findings and patient-based quality of life in chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) have found very low correlations. Whereas surprising, similar findings have been noted in other diseases. Methods: We performed a cross-sectional analysis of the association between objective and subjective findings in nasal septal deformity and a systematic review and synthesis of the literature on CRS and other diseases. Results: We found no association between objective anatomic findings and subjective symptoms in nasal obstruction (R = 0.03; Kruskal-Wallis test, p = 0.97). Multiple studies in CRS and other diseases - sleep apnea, hearing loss, asthma, etc. - have found similarly low correlations between objective and subjective testing. Conclusion: For nasal septal deviation and CRS, the patient's subjective perception of disease severity has, at best, a very weak association with objective assessment of severity. Patient-based outcomes assessment remains important; these instruments apparently quantify an aspect of disease not detected by objective testing.

AB - Background: Prior studies on the relationship between computed tomography scan findings and patient-based quality of life in chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) have found very low correlations. Whereas surprising, similar findings have been noted in other diseases. Methods: We performed a cross-sectional analysis of the association between objective and subjective findings in nasal septal deformity and a systematic review and synthesis of the literature on CRS and other diseases. Results: We found no association between objective anatomic findings and subjective symptoms in nasal obstruction (R = 0.03; Kruskal-Wallis test, p = 0.97). Multiple studies in CRS and other diseases - sleep apnea, hearing loss, asthma, etc. - have found similarly low correlations between objective and subjective testing. Conclusion: For nasal septal deviation and CRS, the patient's subjective perception of disease severity has, at best, a very weak association with objective assessment of severity. Patient-based outcomes assessment remains important; these instruments apparently quantify an aspect of disease not detected by objective testing.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=27944440977&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=27944440977&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 19

SP - 529

EP - 535

JO - American Journal of Rhinology and Allergy

JF - American Journal of Rhinology and Allergy

SN - 1945-8924

IS - 5

ER -