Objective and subjective measures reflect different aspects of balance in multiple sclerosis

Michelle Cameron, Jessie Huisinga

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The objective of this study was to evaluate relationships between subjective and objective measures of balance in multiple sclerosis (MS). In 54 subjects with MS, balance was measured objectively with the Sensory Organization Test (SOT) using dynamic posturography and subjectively with the Activities-specific Balance Confidence (ABC) Scale and the Falls Efficacy Scale-International (FES-I). MS-related disability was assessed with the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS). Relationships between the magnitude (root mean square, range, and area) as well as velocity of center of pressure sway (calculated from the center of pressure signal from the SOT), composite SOT, ABC Scale, FES-I, and EDSS scores were assessed. The magnitude and velocity of center of pressure sway was statistically significantly correlated with the ABC Scale (rho = -0.2 to -0.5), FES-I (rho = 0.3 to 0.5), and EDSS (rho = 0.3 to 0.4). The composite SOT was also statistically significantly correlated with the ABC Scale, FES-I, and EDSS. Objective balance measures, as reflected by posturography, were significantly related to subjective reports of imbalance and clinical measures of disability in MS. The relationships are moderate to weak, indicating that a comprehensive description of balance problems in people with MS likely requires both objective and subjective balance measures.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1401-1409
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of Rehabilitation Research and Development
Volume50
Issue number10
DOIs
StatePublished - 2013

Fingerprint

Multiple Sclerosis
Pressure

Keywords

  • Accidental falls
  • Cohort studies
  • Disability
  • Imbalance
  • Measurement
  • Multiple sclerosis
  • Physical examination
  • Postural balance
  • Posturography
  • Questionnaires

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Rehabilitation
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Objective and subjective measures reflect different aspects of balance in multiple sclerosis. / Cameron, Michelle; Huisinga, Jessie.

In: Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development, Vol. 50, No. 10, 2013, p. 1401-1409.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{87aee27e7165413a8f5443e9e7315153,
title = "Objective and subjective measures reflect different aspects of balance in multiple sclerosis",
abstract = "The objective of this study was to evaluate relationships between subjective and objective measures of balance in multiple sclerosis (MS). In 54 subjects with MS, balance was measured objectively with the Sensory Organization Test (SOT) using dynamic posturography and subjectively with the Activities-specific Balance Confidence (ABC) Scale and the Falls Efficacy Scale-International (FES-I). MS-related disability was assessed with the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS). Relationships between the magnitude (root mean square, range, and area) as well as velocity of center of pressure sway (calculated from the center of pressure signal from the SOT), composite SOT, ABC Scale, FES-I, and EDSS scores were assessed. The magnitude and velocity of center of pressure sway was statistically significantly correlated with the ABC Scale (rho = -0.2 to -0.5), FES-I (rho = 0.3 to 0.5), and EDSS (rho = 0.3 to 0.4). The composite SOT was also statistically significantly correlated with the ABC Scale, FES-I, and EDSS. Objective balance measures, as reflected by posturography, were significantly related to subjective reports of imbalance and clinical measures of disability in MS. The relationships are moderate to weak, indicating that a comprehensive description of balance problems in people with MS likely requires both objective and subjective balance measures.",
keywords = "Accidental falls, Cohort studies, Disability, Imbalance, Measurement, Multiple sclerosis, Physical examination, Postural balance, Posturography, Questionnaires",
author = "Michelle Cameron and Jessie Huisinga",
year = "2013",
doi = "10.1682/JRRD.2013.02.0042",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "50",
pages = "1401--1409",
journal = "Journal of rehabilitation R&D",
issn = "0007-506X",
publisher = "Department of Veterans Affairs",
number = "10",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Objective and subjective measures reflect different aspects of balance in multiple sclerosis

AU - Cameron, Michelle

AU - Huisinga, Jessie

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

N2 - The objective of this study was to evaluate relationships between subjective and objective measures of balance in multiple sclerosis (MS). In 54 subjects with MS, balance was measured objectively with the Sensory Organization Test (SOT) using dynamic posturography and subjectively with the Activities-specific Balance Confidence (ABC) Scale and the Falls Efficacy Scale-International (FES-I). MS-related disability was assessed with the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS). Relationships between the magnitude (root mean square, range, and area) as well as velocity of center of pressure sway (calculated from the center of pressure signal from the SOT), composite SOT, ABC Scale, FES-I, and EDSS scores were assessed. The magnitude and velocity of center of pressure sway was statistically significantly correlated with the ABC Scale (rho = -0.2 to -0.5), FES-I (rho = 0.3 to 0.5), and EDSS (rho = 0.3 to 0.4). The composite SOT was also statistically significantly correlated with the ABC Scale, FES-I, and EDSS. Objective balance measures, as reflected by posturography, were significantly related to subjective reports of imbalance and clinical measures of disability in MS. The relationships are moderate to weak, indicating that a comprehensive description of balance problems in people with MS likely requires both objective and subjective balance measures.

AB - The objective of this study was to evaluate relationships between subjective and objective measures of balance in multiple sclerosis (MS). In 54 subjects with MS, balance was measured objectively with the Sensory Organization Test (SOT) using dynamic posturography and subjectively with the Activities-specific Balance Confidence (ABC) Scale and the Falls Efficacy Scale-International (FES-I). MS-related disability was assessed with the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS). Relationships between the magnitude (root mean square, range, and area) as well as velocity of center of pressure sway (calculated from the center of pressure signal from the SOT), composite SOT, ABC Scale, FES-I, and EDSS scores were assessed. The magnitude and velocity of center of pressure sway was statistically significantly correlated with the ABC Scale (rho = -0.2 to -0.5), FES-I (rho = 0.3 to 0.5), and EDSS (rho = 0.3 to 0.4). The composite SOT was also statistically significantly correlated with the ABC Scale, FES-I, and EDSS. Objective balance measures, as reflected by posturography, were significantly related to subjective reports of imbalance and clinical measures of disability in MS. The relationships are moderate to weak, indicating that a comprehensive description of balance problems in people with MS likely requires both objective and subjective balance measures.

KW - Accidental falls

KW - Cohort studies

KW - Disability

KW - Imbalance

KW - Measurement

KW - Multiple sclerosis

KW - Physical examination

KW - Postural balance

KW - Posturography

KW - Questionnaires

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84896385416&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84896385416&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1682/JRRD.2013.02.0042

DO - 10.1682/JRRD.2013.02.0042

M3 - Article

C2 - 24699975

AN - SCOPUS:84896385416

VL - 50

SP - 1401

EP - 1409

JO - Journal of rehabilitation R&D

JF - Journal of rehabilitation R&D

SN - 0007-506X

IS - 10

ER -