Noninvasive tests as a substitute for histology in the diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori infection

Martin Hahn, M. Brian Fennerty, Christopher L. Corless, Nathan Magaret, David A. Lieberman, Douglas O. Faigel

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

35 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background: Rapid urease tests for Helicobacter pylori have a sensitivity of 80% to 90%. Therefore histologic examination of gastric biopsies is recommended as a 'backup' diagnostic test in rapid urease test- negative patients. However, noninvasive tests (urea breath test, serology, whole blood antibody tests) may provide a more rapid diagnosis and be less expensive but offer similar accuracy. Methods: Sixty-seven patients (no prior treatment for H pylori, no proton pump inhibitors, antibiotics, or bismuth within 4 weeks) undergoing endoscopy for evaluation of dyspepsia symptoms and testing rapid urease test-negative by antral biopsy were enrolled. All had the following tests: gastric biopsies (2 antral, 1 fundus; H and E and Alcian Yellow stain) examined for gastritis and H pylori; 13C-UBT; capillary blood for whole blood rapid antibody tests: FlexSure HP, QuickVue, AccuStat, and Stat-Simple Pylori; serum for FlexSure HP; HM-CAP enzyme-linked immunoassay. H pylori infection was diagnosed (reference standard) if chronic gastritis was present on histology and at least 2 of the 3 following tests were positive: urea breath test, H pylori organisms unequivocally demonstrated in biopsies on special stain, and/or enzyme-linked immunoassay. The test and treatment costs per patient were calculated. Results: Of 67 patients with a negative rapid urease test, 4 were positive for H pylori. None had active peptic ulcer disease. Histology only identified I patient with organisms visible on special stain. Using chronic active gastritis (neutrophilic and mononuclear infiltrate) as a diagnostic criterion for H pylori, 6 patients would have been judged positive. However, only 2 of these were truly positive by the reference standard (positive predictive value 33%). Negative predictive value for presence of organisms and chronic active gastritis was 95% and 97%, respectively. All of the noninvasive tests identified all 4 truly positive patients correctly. Urea breath test and FlexSure whole blood assay yielded a substantial number of false-positive results (positive predictive value 31% and 36%, respectively); positive predictive value for the other tests ranged from 50% to 80%. All tests except histology had a negative predictive value of 100%. Histology was the most costly test (p < 0.001 compared with all other tests), followed by urea breath test and HM-CAP serology (p < 0.001 compared with all rapid antibody tests). Conclusions: Whole blood or serum antibody testing is a rapid, accurate, and cost- effective means for establishing H pylori status in rapid urease test- negative patients. Whole blood or serology rapid antibody testing should substitute for histology when the patient has not been previously treated for H pylori.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)20-26
Number of pages7
JournalGastrointestinal endoscopy
Volume52
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 2000

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging
  • Gastroenterology

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Noninvasive tests as a substitute for histology in the diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori infection'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this