Noninvasive diagnosis of gastroesophageal inflammation using dipyridamole thallium-201 tomography

Barry T. De Gregorio, M. Brian Fennerty, Richard A. Wilson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

6 Scopus citations


Objective: Esophagitis, a complication of GERD, and gastric erosions are common findings in dyspeptic patients. Unfortunately, these findings cannot be predicted based on symptoms alone and require endoscopy for an accurate diagnosis. Noninvasive diagnosis of other gastrointestinal pathology by radiopharmaceuticals (GA 67, Tc 99m pertechnetate) has previously been studied. We hypothesized that endoscopically documented esophagitis and/or gastric erosions could also be detected by using dipyridamole thallium-201 imaging and, if they were of sufficient accuracy, could serve as a useful, noninvasive screening test for esophagitis and/or gastric erosions. Methods: A pilot study was undertaken in 12 patients undergoing endoscopy for symptoms of GERD or dyspepsia. Esophagitis was defined as the presence of either erosions or ulceration and gastric erosions were defined as discrete mucosal breaks measuring ≥1 mm. Dipyridamole thallium-201 imaging was performed the following day on all 12 patients. A standard dose of dipyridamole (0.56 mg/kg) was infused over 4 min, followed by a 3-mCi dose of thallium-201. Initial stress tomographic images and reinjection (1 mCi) resting tomographic images 3-4 h later were obtained using a gamma camera. Tomographic images were read blinded to the endoscopy results. Thallium-201 uptake was graded on a 0-3+ scale using the liver uptake as the internal comparative standard (2+ = uptake equal to the liver). Abnormal thallium uptake was defined as ≥2+ in the area of the esophagus or stomach. Results: Seven women and five men (mean age 41 yr, range 25-60 yr) were studied. Eight patients were taking histamine-2 receptor antagonists and none were on proton pump inhibitors, or promotility agents. All five patients with endoscopic esophagitis had a positive thallium-201 tomographic image. Seven patients had no evidence of esophagitis, and three had positive thallium-201 tomograms. Dipyridamole thallium-201 imaging sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values for esophagitis were 100%, 57%, 63%, and 100%, respectively. All three patients with gastric erosions had positive thallium- 201 tomograms. Six of nine patients without gastric erosions had positive tomograms. The sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of DT 201 gastric erosions were 100%, 33%, 33%, and 100%, respectively. Conclusions: Dipyridamole thallium-201 tomographic imaging has good sensitivity (100 %) in detecting esophagogastric mucosal erosions, but its poor specificity (3357%) results in an unacceptable accuracy as a screening test. Additionally, the cost of radiopharmaceuticals requires that sensitivity and specificity be at least equal to that of endoscopy for this test to be clinically valuable as a screening test. However, a noninvasive test for these diseases is inherently appealing, and further research in this area seems to be warranted.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1255-1259
Number of pages5
JournalAmerican Journal of Gastroenterology
Issue number8
StatePublished - Aug 1998

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Hepatology
  • Gastroenterology


Dive into the research topics of 'Noninvasive diagnosis of gastroesophageal inflammation using dipyridamole thallium-201 tomography'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this