New insights on vaginal birth after cesarean: Can it be predicted?

Karen B. Eden, Marian McDonagh, Mary Denman, Nicole Marshall, Cathy Emeis, Rongwei Fu, Rosalind Janik, Miranda Walker, Jeanne Marie Guise

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

76 Scopus citations


Objective: To evaluate existing vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC) screening tools and to identify additional factors that may predict VBAC or failed trial of labor. Data sources: Relevant studies were identified through MEDLINE, Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effectiveness, and the Cochrane databases (1980-September 2009), and from recent systematic reviews, reference lists, reviews, editorials, web sites, and experts. Methods of study selection: Inclusion criteria limited studies to those of humans, written in English, studies conducted in the United States and developed countries, and those rated good or fair quality by the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force criteria. Studies of individual predictors were combined using a random effects model when the estimated odds ratios were comparable across included studies. Tabulation, integration, and Results: We identified 3,134 citations and reviewed 963 papers, of which 203 met inclusion criteria and were quality-rated. Twenty-eight provided evidence on predictors of VBAC and 16 presented information on scored models for predicting VBAC (or failed trial of labor). Six of the 11 scored models for predicting VBAC (or failed trial of labor) were validated by separated dataset, cross-validation, or both. Whereas accuracy remained high across all models for predicting VBAC, with predictive values ranging from 88% to 95%, accuracy for predicting failed trial of labor was low, ranging from 33% to 58%. Individual predictors including Hispanic ethnicity, African-American race, advanced maternal age, no previous vaginal birth history, birth weight heavier than 4 kg, and use of either augmentation or induction were all associated with reduced likelihood of VBAC. Conclusion: Current scored models provide reasonable predictability for VBAC, but none provides consistent ability to identify women at risk for failed trial of labor. A scoring model is needed that incorporates known antepartum factors and can be adjusted for current obstetric factors and labor patterns if induction or augmentation is needed. This would allow women and clinicians to better determine individuals most likely to require repeat cesarean delivery.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)967-981
Number of pages15
JournalObstetrics and gynecology
Issue number4
StatePublished - Oct 2010

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Obstetrics and Gynecology


Dive into the research topics of 'New insights on vaginal birth after cesarean: Can it be predicted?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this