Neck mass secondary to pedicle ossification after oromandibular reconstruction

Adam S. Deconde, Darshni Vira, Keith E. Blackwell, John M. Moriarty, Joel A. Sercarz, Vishad Nabili

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Educational Objective: At the conclusion of this presentation the participants should be able to describe this newly described phenomenon associated with fibula free flap oromandibular reconstruction. Objectives: To determine the radiographic incidence of heterotopic ossification and the clinical incidence of neck masses secondary to heterotopic ossification in a series of patients who underwent fibula free flap oromandibular reconstruction. Study Design: Retrospective review at a university medical center. Methods: Patient database of 520 consecutive fibula free flaps between 1995-2010 were reviewed to identify patients who had postoperative CT scans of the neck to further investigate the radiologic presence of heterotopic ossification. Patient chart review was also performed to identify patients who had clinical evidence of neck masses consistent with heterotopic ossification. Results: Of the 66 patients who had postoperative CT scans available for radiologic assessment, 43/66 (65%) showed heterotopic ossification of the fibula periosteum. Clinically, 14/520 patients (2.6%) presented with firm, level I or II neck masses that proved to be secondary to heterotopic ossification. Conclusions: Development of a firm neck mass after treatment of head and neck cancer often indicates recurrent tumor. Heterotopic ossification has not been previously reported as a potential etiology of neck masses after fibula free flap oromandibular reconstruction in the head and neck surgery literature. The radiographic incidence of this phenomenon is high, while the clinical incidence of neck masses secondary to heterotopic ossification is low. Heterotopic ossification can be distinguished from recurrent tumor on the basis of physical examination, radiographic assessment, and/or fine needle aspiration biopsy. Awareness of heterotopic ossification should be included in the differential diagnosis of patients with a neck mass who have undergone fibula free flap reconstructions.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalLaryngoscope
Volume121
Issue numberSUPPL. 4
DOIs
StatePublished - 2011
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Heterotopic Ossification
Osteogenesis
Neck
Fibula
Free Tissue Flaps
Incidence
Periosteum
Head and Neck Neoplasms
Fine Needle Biopsy
Physical Examination
Neoplasms
Differential Diagnosis
Retrospective Studies
Head
Databases

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Otorhinolaryngology

Cite this

Deconde, A. S., Vira, D., Blackwell, K. E., Moriarty, J. M., Sercarz, J. A., & Nabili, V. (2011). Neck mass secondary to pedicle ossification after oromandibular reconstruction. Laryngoscope, 121(SUPPL. 4). https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.21984

Neck mass secondary to pedicle ossification after oromandibular reconstruction. / Deconde, Adam S.; Vira, Darshni; Blackwell, Keith E.; Moriarty, John M.; Sercarz, Joel A.; Nabili, Vishad.

In: Laryngoscope, Vol. 121, No. SUPPL. 4, 2011.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Deconde, AS, Vira, D, Blackwell, KE, Moriarty, JM, Sercarz, JA & Nabili, V 2011, 'Neck mass secondary to pedicle ossification after oromandibular reconstruction', Laryngoscope, vol. 121, no. SUPPL. 4. https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.21984
Deconde AS, Vira D, Blackwell KE, Moriarty JM, Sercarz JA, Nabili V. Neck mass secondary to pedicle ossification after oromandibular reconstruction. Laryngoscope. 2011;121(SUPPL. 4). https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.21984
Deconde, Adam S. ; Vira, Darshni ; Blackwell, Keith E. ; Moriarty, John M. ; Sercarz, Joel A. ; Nabili, Vishad. / Neck mass secondary to pedicle ossification after oromandibular reconstruction. In: Laryngoscope. 2011 ; Vol. 121, No. SUPPL. 4.
@article{c5530ba7e59845ffaa69d165a39752ff,
title = "Neck mass secondary to pedicle ossification after oromandibular reconstruction",
abstract = "Educational Objective: At the conclusion of this presentation the participants should be able to describe this newly described phenomenon associated with fibula free flap oromandibular reconstruction. Objectives: To determine the radiographic incidence of heterotopic ossification and the clinical incidence of neck masses secondary to heterotopic ossification in a series of patients who underwent fibula free flap oromandibular reconstruction. Study Design: Retrospective review at a university medical center. Methods: Patient database of 520 consecutive fibula free flaps between 1995-2010 were reviewed to identify patients who had postoperative CT scans of the neck to further investigate the radiologic presence of heterotopic ossification. Patient chart review was also performed to identify patients who had clinical evidence of neck masses consistent with heterotopic ossification. Results: Of the 66 patients who had postoperative CT scans available for radiologic assessment, 43/66 (65{\%}) showed heterotopic ossification of the fibula periosteum. Clinically, 14/520 patients (2.6{\%}) presented with firm, level I or II neck masses that proved to be secondary to heterotopic ossification. Conclusions: Development of a firm neck mass after treatment of head and neck cancer often indicates recurrent tumor. Heterotopic ossification has not been previously reported as a potential etiology of neck masses after fibula free flap oromandibular reconstruction in the head and neck surgery literature. The radiographic incidence of this phenomenon is high, while the clinical incidence of neck masses secondary to heterotopic ossification is low. Heterotopic ossification can be distinguished from recurrent tumor on the basis of physical examination, radiographic assessment, and/or fine needle aspiration biopsy. Awareness of heterotopic ossification should be included in the differential diagnosis of patients with a neck mass who have undergone fibula free flap reconstructions.",
author = "Deconde, {Adam S.} and Darshni Vira and Blackwell, {Keith E.} and Moriarty, {John M.} and Sercarz, {Joel A.} and Vishad Nabili",
year = "2011",
doi = "10.1002/lary.21984",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "121",
journal = "Laryngoscope",
issn = "0023-852X",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Inc.",
number = "SUPPL. 4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Neck mass secondary to pedicle ossification after oromandibular reconstruction

AU - Deconde, Adam S.

AU - Vira, Darshni

AU - Blackwell, Keith E.

AU - Moriarty, John M.

AU - Sercarz, Joel A.

AU - Nabili, Vishad

PY - 2011

Y1 - 2011

N2 - Educational Objective: At the conclusion of this presentation the participants should be able to describe this newly described phenomenon associated with fibula free flap oromandibular reconstruction. Objectives: To determine the radiographic incidence of heterotopic ossification and the clinical incidence of neck masses secondary to heterotopic ossification in a series of patients who underwent fibula free flap oromandibular reconstruction. Study Design: Retrospective review at a university medical center. Methods: Patient database of 520 consecutive fibula free flaps between 1995-2010 were reviewed to identify patients who had postoperative CT scans of the neck to further investigate the radiologic presence of heterotopic ossification. Patient chart review was also performed to identify patients who had clinical evidence of neck masses consistent with heterotopic ossification. Results: Of the 66 patients who had postoperative CT scans available for radiologic assessment, 43/66 (65%) showed heterotopic ossification of the fibula periosteum. Clinically, 14/520 patients (2.6%) presented with firm, level I or II neck masses that proved to be secondary to heterotopic ossification. Conclusions: Development of a firm neck mass after treatment of head and neck cancer often indicates recurrent tumor. Heterotopic ossification has not been previously reported as a potential etiology of neck masses after fibula free flap oromandibular reconstruction in the head and neck surgery literature. The radiographic incidence of this phenomenon is high, while the clinical incidence of neck masses secondary to heterotopic ossification is low. Heterotopic ossification can be distinguished from recurrent tumor on the basis of physical examination, radiographic assessment, and/or fine needle aspiration biopsy. Awareness of heterotopic ossification should be included in the differential diagnosis of patients with a neck mass who have undergone fibula free flap reconstructions.

AB - Educational Objective: At the conclusion of this presentation the participants should be able to describe this newly described phenomenon associated with fibula free flap oromandibular reconstruction. Objectives: To determine the radiographic incidence of heterotopic ossification and the clinical incidence of neck masses secondary to heterotopic ossification in a series of patients who underwent fibula free flap oromandibular reconstruction. Study Design: Retrospective review at a university medical center. Methods: Patient database of 520 consecutive fibula free flaps between 1995-2010 were reviewed to identify patients who had postoperative CT scans of the neck to further investigate the radiologic presence of heterotopic ossification. Patient chart review was also performed to identify patients who had clinical evidence of neck masses consistent with heterotopic ossification. Results: Of the 66 patients who had postoperative CT scans available for radiologic assessment, 43/66 (65%) showed heterotopic ossification of the fibula periosteum. Clinically, 14/520 patients (2.6%) presented with firm, level I or II neck masses that proved to be secondary to heterotopic ossification. Conclusions: Development of a firm neck mass after treatment of head and neck cancer often indicates recurrent tumor. Heterotopic ossification has not been previously reported as a potential etiology of neck masses after fibula free flap oromandibular reconstruction in the head and neck surgery literature. The radiographic incidence of this phenomenon is high, while the clinical incidence of neck masses secondary to heterotopic ossification is low. Heterotopic ossification can be distinguished from recurrent tumor on the basis of physical examination, radiographic assessment, and/or fine needle aspiration biopsy. Awareness of heterotopic ossification should be included in the differential diagnosis of patients with a neck mass who have undergone fibula free flap reconstructions.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79960005022&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79960005022&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/lary.21984

DO - 10.1002/lary.21984

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:79960005022

VL - 121

JO - Laryngoscope

JF - Laryngoscope

SN - 0023-852X

IS - SUPPL. 4

ER -