Navigating high-risk surgery: Protocol for a multisite, stepped wedge, cluster-randomised trial of a question prompt list intervention to empower older adults to ask questions that inform treatment decisions

Lauren J. Taylor, Paul J. Rathouz, Ana Berlin, Karen Brasel, Anne C. Mosenthal, Emily Finlayson, Zara Cooper, Nicole M. Steffens, Nora Jacobson, Anne Buffington, Jennifer L. Tucholka, Qianqian Zhao, Margaret L. Schwarze

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Introduction: Older patients frequently undergo operations that carry high risk for postoperative complications and death. Poor preoperative communication between patients and surgeons can lead to uninformed decisions and result in unexpected outcomes, conflict between surgeons and patients, and treatment inconsistent with patient preferences. This article describes the protocol for a multisite, cluster-randomised trial that uses a stepped wedge design to test a patient-driven question prompt list (QPL) intervention aimed to improve preoperative decision making and inform postoperative expectations. Methods and analysis: This Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute-funded trial will be conducted at five academic medical centres in the USA. Study participants include surgeons who routinely perform vascular or oncological surgery, their patients and families. We aim to enrol 40 surgeons and 480 patients over 24 months. Patients age 65 or older who see a study-enrolled surgeon to discuss a vascular or oncological problem that could be treated with high-risk surgery will be enrolled at their clinic visit. Together with stakeholders, we developed a QPL intervention addressing preoperative communication needs of patients considering major surgery. Guided by the theories of self-determination and relational autonomy, this intervention is designed to increase patient activation. Patients will receive the QPL brochure and a letter from their surgeon encouraging its use. Using audio recordings of the outpatient surgical consultation, patient and family member questionnaires administered at three time points and retrospective chart review, we will compare the effectiveness of the QPL intervention to usual care with respect to the following primary outcomes: patient engagement in decision making, psychological well-being and post-treatment regret for patients and families, and interpersonal and intrapersonal conflict relating to treatment decisions and treatments received. Ethics and dissemination: Approvals have been granted by the Institutional Review Board at the University of Wisconsin and at each participating site, and a Certificate of Confidentiality has been obtained. Results will be reported in peer-reviewed publications and presented at national meetings.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article numbere014002
JournalBMJ Open
Volume7
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - May 1 2017

Fingerprint

Therapeutics
Patient Participation
Blood Vessels
Decision Making
Patient Outcome Assessment
Communication
Personal Autonomy
Pamphlets
Patient Preference
Research Ethics Committees
Confidentiality
Ambulatory Care
Ethics
Publications
Surgeons
Emotions
Outpatients
Referral and Consultation
Psychology
Conflict (Psychology)

Keywords

  • communication
  • geriatric surgery
  • question prompt list
  • shared decision making

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Navigating high-risk surgery : Protocol for a multisite, stepped wedge, cluster-randomised trial of a question prompt list intervention to empower older adults to ask questions that inform treatment decisions. / Taylor, Lauren J.; Rathouz, Paul J.; Berlin, Ana; Brasel, Karen; Mosenthal, Anne C.; Finlayson, Emily; Cooper, Zara; Steffens, Nicole M.; Jacobson, Nora; Buffington, Anne; Tucholka, Jennifer L.; Zhao, Qianqian; Schwarze, Margaret L.

In: BMJ Open, Vol. 7, No. 5, e014002, 01.05.2017.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Taylor, LJ, Rathouz, PJ, Berlin, A, Brasel, K, Mosenthal, AC, Finlayson, E, Cooper, Z, Steffens, NM, Jacobson, N, Buffington, A, Tucholka, JL, Zhao, Q & Schwarze, ML 2017, 'Navigating high-risk surgery: Protocol for a multisite, stepped wedge, cluster-randomised trial of a question prompt list intervention to empower older adults to ask questions that inform treatment decisions', BMJ Open, vol. 7, no. 5, e014002. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-014002
Taylor, Lauren J. ; Rathouz, Paul J. ; Berlin, Ana ; Brasel, Karen ; Mosenthal, Anne C. ; Finlayson, Emily ; Cooper, Zara ; Steffens, Nicole M. ; Jacobson, Nora ; Buffington, Anne ; Tucholka, Jennifer L. ; Zhao, Qianqian ; Schwarze, Margaret L. / Navigating high-risk surgery : Protocol for a multisite, stepped wedge, cluster-randomised trial of a question prompt list intervention to empower older adults to ask questions that inform treatment decisions. In: BMJ Open. 2017 ; Vol. 7, No. 5.
@article{dff2955b25794a88937e86ee69895163,
title = "Navigating high-risk surgery: Protocol for a multisite, stepped wedge, cluster-randomised trial of a question prompt list intervention to empower older adults to ask questions that inform treatment decisions",
abstract = "Introduction: Older patients frequently undergo operations that carry high risk for postoperative complications and death. Poor preoperative communication between patients and surgeons can lead to uninformed decisions and result in unexpected outcomes, conflict between surgeons and patients, and treatment inconsistent with patient preferences. This article describes the protocol for a multisite, cluster-randomised trial that uses a stepped wedge design to test a patient-driven question prompt list (QPL) intervention aimed to improve preoperative decision making and inform postoperative expectations. Methods and analysis: This Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute-funded trial will be conducted at five academic medical centres in the USA. Study participants include surgeons who routinely perform vascular or oncological surgery, their patients and families. We aim to enrol 40 surgeons and 480 patients over 24 months. Patients age 65 or older who see a study-enrolled surgeon to discuss a vascular or oncological problem that could be treated with high-risk surgery will be enrolled at their clinic visit. Together with stakeholders, we developed a QPL intervention addressing preoperative communication needs of patients considering major surgery. Guided by the theories of self-determination and relational autonomy, this intervention is designed to increase patient activation. Patients will receive the QPL brochure and a letter from their surgeon encouraging its use. Using audio recordings of the outpatient surgical consultation, patient and family member questionnaires administered at three time points and retrospective chart review, we will compare the effectiveness of the QPL intervention to usual care with respect to the following primary outcomes: patient engagement in decision making, psychological well-being and post-treatment regret for patients and families, and interpersonal and intrapersonal conflict relating to treatment decisions and treatments received. Ethics and dissemination: Approvals have been granted by the Institutional Review Board at the University of Wisconsin and at each participating site, and a Certificate of Confidentiality has been obtained. Results will be reported in peer-reviewed publications and presented at national meetings.",
keywords = "communication, geriatric surgery, question prompt list, shared decision making",
author = "Taylor, {Lauren J.} and Rathouz, {Paul J.} and Ana Berlin and Karen Brasel and Mosenthal, {Anne C.} and Emily Finlayson and Zara Cooper and Steffens, {Nicole M.} and Nora Jacobson and Anne Buffington and Tucholka, {Jennifer L.} and Qianqian Zhao and Schwarze, {Margaret L.}",
year = "2017",
month = "5",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1136/bmjopen-2016-014002",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "7",
journal = "BMJ Open",
issn = "2044-6055",
publisher = "BMJ Publishing Group",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Navigating high-risk surgery

T2 - Protocol for a multisite, stepped wedge, cluster-randomised trial of a question prompt list intervention to empower older adults to ask questions that inform treatment decisions

AU - Taylor, Lauren J.

AU - Rathouz, Paul J.

AU - Berlin, Ana

AU - Brasel, Karen

AU - Mosenthal, Anne C.

AU - Finlayson, Emily

AU - Cooper, Zara

AU - Steffens, Nicole M.

AU - Jacobson, Nora

AU - Buffington, Anne

AU - Tucholka, Jennifer L.

AU - Zhao, Qianqian

AU - Schwarze, Margaret L.

PY - 2017/5/1

Y1 - 2017/5/1

N2 - Introduction: Older patients frequently undergo operations that carry high risk for postoperative complications and death. Poor preoperative communication between patients and surgeons can lead to uninformed decisions and result in unexpected outcomes, conflict between surgeons and patients, and treatment inconsistent with patient preferences. This article describes the protocol for a multisite, cluster-randomised trial that uses a stepped wedge design to test a patient-driven question prompt list (QPL) intervention aimed to improve preoperative decision making and inform postoperative expectations. Methods and analysis: This Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute-funded trial will be conducted at five academic medical centres in the USA. Study participants include surgeons who routinely perform vascular or oncological surgery, their patients and families. We aim to enrol 40 surgeons and 480 patients over 24 months. Patients age 65 or older who see a study-enrolled surgeon to discuss a vascular or oncological problem that could be treated with high-risk surgery will be enrolled at their clinic visit. Together with stakeholders, we developed a QPL intervention addressing preoperative communication needs of patients considering major surgery. Guided by the theories of self-determination and relational autonomy, this intervention is designed to increase patient activation. Patients will receive the QPL brochure and a letter from their surgeon encouraging its use. Using audio recordings of the outpatient surgical consultation, patient and family member questionnaires administered at three time points and retrospective chart review, we will compare the effectiveness of the QPL intervention to usual care with respect to the following primary outcomes: patient engagement in decision making, psychological well-being and post-treatment regret for patients and families, and interpersonal and intrapersonal conflict relating to treatment decisions and treatments received. Ethics and dissemination: Approvals have been granted by the Institutional Review Board at the University of Wisconsin and at each participating site, and a Certificate of Confidentiality has been obtained. Results will be reported in peer-reviewed publications and presented at national meetings.

AB - Introduction: Older patients frequently undergo operations that carry high risk for postoperative complications and death. Poor preoperative communication between patients and surgeons can lead to uninformed decisions and result in unexpected outcomes, conflict between surgeons and patients, and treatment inconsistent with patient preferences. This article describes the protocol for a multisite, cluster-randomised trial that uses a stepped wedge design to test a patient-driven question prompt list (QPL) intervention aimed to improve preoperative decision making and inform postoperative expectations. Methods and analysis: This Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute-funded trial will be conducted at five academic medical centres in the USA. Study participants include surgeons who routinely perform vascular or oncological surgery, their patients and families. We aim to enrol 40 surgeons and 480 patients over 24 months. Patients age 65 or older who see a study-enrolled surgeon to discuss a vascular or oncological problem that could be treated with high-risk surgery will be enrolled at their clinic visit. Together with stakeholders, we developed a QPL intervention addressing preoperative communication needs of patients considering major surgery. Guided by the theories of self-determination and relational autonomy, this intervention is designed to increase patient activation. Patients will receive the QPL brochure and a letter from their surgeon encouraging its use. Using audio recordings of the outpatient surgical consultation, patient and family member questionnaires administered at three time points and retrospective chart review, we will compare the effectiveness of the QPL intervention to usual care with respect to the following primary outcomes: patient engagement in decision making, psychological well-being and post-treatment regret for patients and families, and interpersonal and intrapersonal conflict relating to treatment decisions and treatments received. Ethics and dissemination: Approvals have been granted by the Institutional Review Board at the University of Wisconsin and at each participating site, and a Certificate of Confidentiality has been obtained. Results will be reported in peer-reviewed publications and presented at national meetings.

KW - communication

KW - geriatric surgery

KW - question prompt list

KW - shared decision making

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85020031175&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85020031175&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-014002

DO - 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-014002

M3 - Article

C2 - 28554911

AN - SCOPUS:85020031175

VL - 7

JO - BMJ Open

JF - BMJ Open

SN - 2044-6055

IS - 5

M1 - e014002

ER -