National Institutes of Health initiatives for advancing scientific developments in clinical neuropsychology

Thomas D. Parsons, Tyler Duffield

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: The current review briefly addresses the history of neuropsychology as a context for discussion of developmental milestones that have advanced the profession, as well as areas where the progression has lagged. More recently in the digital/information age, utilization and incorporation of emerging technologies has been minimal, which has stagnated ongoing evolution of the practice of neuropsychology despite technology changing many aspects of daily living. These authors advocate for embracing National Institutes of Health (NIH) initiatives, or interchangeably referred to as transformative opportunities, for the behavioral and social sciences. These initiatives address the need for neuropsychologists to transition from fragmented and data-poor approaches to integrated and data-rich scientific approaches that ultimately improve translational applications. Specific to neuropsychology is the need for the adoption of novel means of brain–behavior characterizations. Method: Narrative review Conclusions: Clinical neuropsychology has reached a developmental plateau where it is ready to embrace the measurement science and technological advances which have been readily adopted by the human neurosciences. While there are ways in which neuropsychology is making inroads into these areas, a great deal of growth is needed to maintain relevance as a scientific discipline (see Figures 1, 2, and 3) consistent with NIH initiatives to advance scientific developments. Moreover, implications of such progress require discussion and modification of training, ethical, and legal mandates of the practice of neuropsychology.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)246-270
Number of pages25
JournalClinical Neuropsychologist
Volume33
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 17 2019

Fingerprint

Neuropsychology
National Institutes of Health (U.S.)
Technology
Behavioral Sciences
Social Sciences
Neurosciences
Health
History
Growth

Keywords

  • neuroinformatics
  • Neuropsychology 3.0
  • office of behavioral and social sciences research
  • technologies: National Institutes of Health

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology
  • Clinical Psychology
  • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)
  • Psychiatry and Mental health

Cite this

National Institutes of Health initiatives for advancing scientific developments in clinical neuropsychology. / Parsons, Thomas D.; Duffield, Tyler.

In: Clinical Neuropsychologist, Vol. 33, No. 2, 17.02.2019, p. 246-270.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{b671038f5e714f5f8d5b05051e7cedf1,
title = "National Institutes of Health initiatives for advancing scientific developments in clinical neuropsychology",
abstract = "Objective: The current review briefly addresses the history of neuropsychology as a context for discussion of developmental milestones that have advanced the profession, as well as areas where the progression has lagged. More recently in the digital/information age, utilization and incorporation of emerging technologies has been minimal, which has stagnated ongoing evolution of the practice of neuropsychology despite technology changing many aspects of daily living. These authors advocate for embracing National Institutes of Health (NIH) initiatives, or interchangeably referred to as transformative opportunities, for the behavioral and social sciences. These initiatives address the need for neuropsychologists to transition from fragmented and data-poor approaches to integrated and data-rich scientific approaches that ultimately improve translational applications. Specific to neuropsychology is the need for the adoption of novel means of brain–behavior characterizations. Method: Narrative review Conclusions: Clinical neuropsychology has reached a developmental plateau where it is ready to embrace the measurement science and technological advances which have been readily adopted by the human neurosciences. While there are ways in which neuropsychology is making inroads into these areas, a great deal of growth is needed to maintain relevance as a scientific discipline (see Figures 1, 2, and 3) consistent with NIH initiatives to advance scientific developments. Moreover, implications of such progress require discussion and modification of training, ethical, and legal mandates of the practice of neuropsychology.",
keywords = "neuroinformatics, Neuropsychology 3.0, office of behavioral and social sciences research, technologies: National Institutes of Health",
author = "Parsons, {Thomas D.} and Tyler Duffield",
year = "2019",
month = "2",
day = "17",
doi = "10.1080/13854046.2018.1523465",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "33",
pages = "246--270",
journal = "Clinical Neuropsychologist",
issn = "1385-4046",
publisher = "Swets & Zeitlinger",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - National Institutes of Health initiatives for advancing scientific developments in clinical neuropsychology

AU - Parsons, Thomas D.

AU - Duffield, Tyler

PY - 2019/2/17

Y1 - 2019/2/17

N2 - Objective: The current review briefly addresses the history of neuropsychology as a context for discussion of developmental milestones that have advanced the profession, as well as areas where the progression has lagged. More recently in the digital/information age, utilization and incorporation of emerging technologies has been minimal, which has stagnated ongoing evolution of the practice of neuropsychology despite technology changing many aspects of daily living. These authors advocate for embracing National Institutes of Health (NIH) initiatives, or interchangeably referred to as transformative opportunities, for the behavioral and social sciences. These initiatives address the need for neuropsychologists to transition from fragmented and data-poor approaches to integrated and data-rich scientific approaches that ultimately improve translational applications. Specific to neuropsychology is the need for the adoption of novel means of brain–behavior characterizations. Method: Narrative review Conclusions: Clinical neuropsychology has reached a developmental plateau where it is ready to embrace the measurement science and technological advances which have been readily adopted by the human neurosciences. While there are ways in which neuropsychology is making inroads into these areas, a great deal of growth is needed to maintain relevance as a scientific discipline (see Figures 1, 2, and 3) consistent with NIH initiatives to advance scientific developments. Moreover, implications of such progress require discussion and modification of training, ethical, and legal mandates of the practice of neuropsychology.

AB - Objective: The current review briefly addresses the history of neuropsychology as a context for discussion of developmental milestones that have advanced the profession, as well as areas where the progression has lagged. More recently in the digital/information age, utilization and incorporation of emerging technologies has been minimal, which has stagnated ongoing evolution of the practice of neuropsychology despite technology changing many aspects of daily living. These authors advocate for embracing National Institutes of Health (NIH) initiatives, or interchangeably referred to as transformative opportunities, for the behavioral and social sciences. These initiatives address the need for neuropsychologists to transition from fragmented and data-poor approaches to integrated and data-rich scientific approaches that ultimately improve translational applications. Specific to neuropsychology is the need for the adoption of novel means of brain–behavior characterizations. Method: Narrative review Conclusions: Clinical neuropsychology has reached a developmental plateau where it is ready to embrace the measurement science and technological advances which have been readily adopted by the human neurosciences. While there are ways in which neuropsychology is making inroads into these areas, a great deal of growth is needed to maintain relevance as a scientific discipline (see Figures 1, 2, and 3) consistent with NIH initiatives to advance scientific developments. Moreover, implications of such progress require discussion and modification of training, ethical, and legal mandates of the practice of neuropsychology.

KW - neuroinformatics

KW - Neuropsychology 3.0

KW - office of behavioral and social sciences research

KW - technologies: National Institutes of Health

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85061582099&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85061582099&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/13854046.2018.1523465

DO - 10.1080/13854046.2018.1523465

M3 - Article

C2 - 30760117

AN - SCOPUS:85061582099

VL - 33

SP - 246

EP - 270

JO - Clinical Neuropsychologist

JF - Clinical Neuropsychologist

SN - 1385-4046

IS - 2

ER -