Multiportal endoscopic approaches to the central skull base

A cadaveric study

Jeremy Ciporen, Kris S. Moe, Dinesh Ramanathan, Sebastian Lopez, Ernesto Ledesma, Robert Rostomily, Laligam N. Sekhar

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

39 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: There has been marked evolution in techniques in skull base surgery including the development of minimally invasive endoscopic supraorbital, transnasal, and more recently, transorbital approaches. These have been typically described as isolated, rather than concerted approaches. It is possible that rather than using these approaches alone, they could be combined with transnasal approaches to provide improved manipulation angles, shorter working distances, and optimal visualization of the pathology. The primary objective of this study is therefore to determine whether these pathways can be combined in "multiportal" approaches to further improve the surgeon's ability to access and manipulate pathology in the central anterior cranial fossa. Methods: A study was performed on five cadaver heads. Each cadaver underwent an expanded endoscopic binasal approach with clivectomy, bilateral precaruncular transorbital approaches, and bilateral supraorbital craniotomies through an eyebrow incision. A total of 25 procedures were performed. Five endonasal, 10 transorbital, and 10 supraorbital procedures were performed using 0- and 45-degree 4-mm rigid endoscopes. Measurements were obtained from the nasal spine and anterior lacrimal crest to the pituitary gland (PG), optic chiasm (OC), and ipsilateral cavernous carotid artery (IpsiCavCa). Measurements from the anterior border of the orbital roof through the supraorbital approach to the PG and OC were also performed. Photographs were taken to demonstrate these approaches and angles of visualization. Results: The precaruncular transorbital approach provided a uniformly shorter distance to the PG, OC, and IpsiCavCa compared with the endoscopic transnasal approach. The difference in the mean distances between these two approaches in the left and right sides were 2.38 cm (P=.000) and 2.56 cm (P=.000), respectively. The supraorbital approach to the PG and OC was shorter than the transnasal by a mean difference of 1.92 cm (P=.000) and 1.99 cm (P=.000) on the right and left side, respectively. There was no significant difference in the mean distances to the PG and the OC between the transorbital and supraorbital approaches. Use of these approaches in tandem provided an extra working port by which structures above and below the target organ were better visualized and more easily dissected with two-handed microsurgical techniques than through a single approach. Conclusions: The precaruncular transorbital approach provided rapid, direct, coplanar access to the clivus, sella, and suprasellar/parasellar regions. The supraorbital minicraniotomy augmented access to the planum sphenoidale, sella, tuberculum sella, and suprasellar regions. These approaches provided shorter working distances, improved visualization, and working angles that offer more direct access to the pituitary gland, suprasellar region, clivus, medial and lateral cavernous sinus than the endoscopic transnasal approach alone. The combination of endoscopic approaches to the central anterior skull base significantly improved instrument access, particularly to lateral targets, as well as better visualization of the vital structures in these regions. These ports provide the surgeon with a more expansive surgical field and improved the ability to perform two-handed microsurgical dissections.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)705-712
Number of pages8
JournalWorld Neurosurgery
Volume73
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - 2010
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Optic Chiasm
Skull Base
Pituitary Gland
Posterior Cranial Fossa
Carotid Arteries
Cadaver
Anterior Cranial Fossa
Transverse Sinuses
Pathology
Eyebrows
Cavernous Sinus
Temazepam
Craniotomy
Endoscopes
Tears
Nose
Dissection
Spine
Head

Keywords

  • Central skull base approaches
  • Endoscopic approaches
  • Endoscopic transnasal approach
  • Minimally invasive surgery
  • Supraorbital approach
  • Transorbital approach

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Neurology
  • Surgery
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Ciporen, J., Moe, K. S., Ramanathan, D., Lopez, S., Ledesma, E., Rostomily, R., & Sekhar, L. N. (2010). Multiportal endoscopic approaches to the central skull base: A cadaveric study. World Neurosurgery, 73(6), 705-712. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2010.03.033

Multiportal endoscopic approaches to the central skull base : A cadaveric study. / Ciporen, Jeremy; Moe, Kris S.; Ramanathan, Dinesh; Lopez, Sebastian; Ledesma, Ernesto; Rostomily, Robert; Sekhar, Laligam N.

In: World Neurosurgery, Vol. 73, No. 6, 2010, p. 705-712.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Ciporen, J, Moe, KS, Ramanathan, D, Lopez, S, Ledesma, E, Rostomily, R & Sekhar, LN 2010, 'Multiportal endoscopic approaches to the central skull base: A cadaveric study', World Neurosurgery, vol. 73, no. 6, pp. 705-712. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2010.03.033
Ciporen, Jeremy ; Moe, Kris S. ; Ramanathan, Dinesh ; Lopez, Sebastian ; Ledesma, Ernesto ; Rostomily, Robert ; Sekhar, Laligam N. / Multiportal endoscopic approaches to the central skull base : A cadaveric study. In: World Neurosurgery. 2010 ; Vol. 73, No. 6. pp. 705-712.
@article{c37b31a1baf44a95a646aa98cbaad1ce,
title = "Multiportal endoscopic approaches to the central skull base: A cadaveric study",
abstract = "Background: There has been marked evolution in techniques in skull base surgery including the development of minimally invasive endoscopic supraorbital, transnasal, and more recently, transorbital approaches. These have been typically described as isolated, rather than concerted approaches. It is possible that rather than using these approaches alone, they could be combined with transnasal approaches to provide improved manipulation angles, shorter working distances, and optimal visualization of the pathology. The primary objective of this study is therefore to determine whether these pathways can be combined in {"}multiportal{"} approaches to further improve the surgeon's ability to access and manipulate pathology in the central anterior cranial fossa. Methods: A study was performed on five cadaver heads. Each cadaver underwent an expanded endoscopic binasal approach with clivectomy, bilateral precaruncular transorbital approaches, and bilateral supraorbital craniotomies through an eyebrow incision. A total of 25 procedures were performed. Five endonasal, 10 transorbital, and 10 supraorbital procedures were performed using 0- and 45-degree 4-mm rigid endoscopes. Measurements were obtained from the nasal spine and anterior lacrimal crest to the pituitary gland (PG), optic chiasm (OC), and ipsilateral cavernous carotid artery (IpsiCavCa). Measurements from the anterior border of the orbital roof through the supraorbital approach to the PG and OC were also performed. Photographs were taken to demonstrate these approaches and angles of visualization. Results: The precaruncular transorbital approach provided a uniformly shorter distance to the PG, OC, and IpsiCavCa compared with the endoscopic transnasal approach. The difference in the mean distances between these two approaches in the left and right sides were 2.38 cm (P=.000) and 2.56 cm (P=.000), respectively. The supraorbital approach to the PG and OC was shorter than the transnasal by a mean difference of 1.92 cm (P=.000) and 1.99 cm (P=.000) on the right and left side, respectively. There was no significant difference in the mean distances to the PG and the OC between the transorbital and supraorbital approaches. Use of these approaches in tandem provided an extra working port by which structures above and below the target organ were better visualized and more easily dissected with two-handed microsurgical techniques than through a single approach. Conclusions: The precaruncular transorbital approach provided rapid, direct, coplanar access to the clivus, sella, and suprasellar/parasellar regions. The supraorbital minicraniotomy augmented access to the planum sphenoidale, sella, tuberculum sella, and suprasellar regions. These approaches provided shorter working distances, improved visualization, and working angles that offer more direct access to the pituitary gland, suprasellar region, clivus, medial and lateral cavernous sinus than the endoscopic transnasal approach alone. The combination of endoscopic approaches to the central anterior skull base significantly improved instrument access, particularly to lateral targets, as well as better visualization of the vital structures in these regions. These ports provide the surgeon with a more expansive surgical field and improved the ability to perform two-handed microsurgical dissections.",
keywords = "Central skull base approaches, Endoscopic approaches, Endoscopic transnasal approach, Minimally invasive surgery, Supraorbital approach, Transorbital approach",
author = "Jeremy Ciporen and Moe, {Kris S.} and Dinesh Ramanathan and Sebastian Lopez and Ernesto Ledesma and Robert Rostomily and Sekhar, {Laligam N.}",
year = "2010",
doi = "10.1016/j.wneu.2010.03.033",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "73",
pages = "705--712",
journal = "World Neurosurgery",
issn = "1878-8750",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Multiportal endoscopic approaches to the central skull base

T2 - A cadaveric study

AU - Ciporen, Jeremy

AU - Moe, Kris S.

AU - Ramanathan, Dinesh

AU - Lopez, Sebastian

AU - Ledesma, Ernesto

AU - Rostomily, Robert

AU - Sekhar, Laligam N.

PY - 2010

Y1 - 2010

N2 - Background: There has been marked evolution in techniques in skull base surgery including the development of minimally invasive endoscopic supraorbital, transnasal, and more recently, transorbital approaches. These have been typically described as isolated, rather than concerted approaches. It is possible that rather than using these approaches alone, they could be combined with transnasal approaches to provide improved manipulation angles, shorter working distances, and optimal visualization of the pathology. The primary objective of this study is therefore to determine whether these pathways can be combined in "multiportal" approaches to further improve the surgeon's ability to access and manipulate pathology in the central anterior cranial fossa. Methods: A study was performed on five cadaver heads. Each cadaver underwent an expanded endoscopic binasal approach with clivectomy, bilateral precaruncular transorbital approaches, and bilateral supraorbital craniotomies through an eyebrow incision. A total of 25 procedures were performed. Five endonasal, 10 transorbital, and 10 supraorbital procedures were performed using 0- and 45-degree 4-mm rigid endoscopes. Measurements were obtained from the nasal spine and anterior lacrimal crest to the pituitary gland (PG), optic chiasm (OC), and ipsilateral cavernous carotid artery (IpsiCavCa). Measurements from the anterior border of the orbital roof through the supraorbital approach to the PG and OC were also performed. Photographs were taken to demonstrate these approaches and angles of visualization. Results: The precaruncular transorbital approach provided a uniformly shorter distance to the PG, OC, and IpsiCavCa compared with the endoscopic transnasal approach. The difference in the mean distances between these two approaches in the left and right sides were 2.38 cm (P=.000) and 2.56 cm (P=.000), respectively. The supraorbital approach to the PG and OC was shorter than the transnasal by a mean difference of 1.92 cm (P=.000) and 1.99 cm (P=.000) on the right and left side, respectively. There was no significant difference in the mean distances to the PG and the OC between the transorbital and supraorbital approaches. Use of these approaches in tandem provided an extra working port by which structures above and below the target organ were better visualized and more easily dissected with two-handed microsurgical techniques than through a single approach. Conclusions: The precaruncular transorbital approach provided rapid, direct, coplanar access to the clivus, sella, and suprasellar/parasellar regions. The supraorbital minicraniotomy augmented access to the planum sphenoidale, sella, tuberculum sella, and suprasellar regions. These approaches provided shorter working distances, improved visualization, and working angles that offer more direct access to the pituitary gland, suprasellar region, clivus, medial and lateral cavernous sinus than the endoscopic transnasal approach alone. The combination of endoscopic approaches to the central anterior skull base significantly improved instrument access, particularly to lateral targets, as well as better visualization of the vital structures in these regions. These ports provide the surgeon with a more expansive surgical field and improved the ability to perform two-handed microsurgical dissections.

AB - Background: There has been marked evolution in techniques in skull base surgery including the development of minimally invasive endoscopic supraorbital, transnasal, and more recently, transorbital approaches. These have been typically described as isolated, rather than concerted approaches. It is possible that rather than using these approaches alone, they could be combined with transnasal approaches to provide improved manipulation angles, shorter working distances, and optimal visualization of the pathology. The primary objective of this study is therefore to determine whether these pathways can be combined in "multiportal" approaches to further improve the surgeon's ability to access and manipulate pathology in the central anterior cranial fossa. Methods: A study was performed on five cadaver heads. Each cadaver underwent an expanded endoscopic binasal approach with clivectomy, bilateral precaruncular transorbital approaches, and bilateral supraorbital craniotomies through an eyebrow incision. A total of 25 procedures were performed. Five endonasal, 10 transorbital, and 10 supraorbital procedures were performed using 0- and 45-degree 4-mm rigid endoscopes. Measurements were obtained from the nasal spine and anterior lacrimal crest to the pituitary gland (PG), optic chiasm (OC), and ipsilateral cavernous carotid artery (IpsiCavCa). Measurements from the anterior border of the orbital roof through the supraorbital approach to the PG and OC were also performed. Photographs were taken to demonstrate these approaches and angles of visualization. Results: The precaruncular transorbital approach provided a uniformly shorter distance to the PG, OC, and IpsiCavCa compared with the endoscopic transnasal approach. The difference in the mean distances between these two approaches in the left and right sides were 2.38 cm (P=.000) and 2.56 cm (P=.000), respectively. The supraorbital approach to the PG and OC was shorter than the transnasal by a mean difference of 1.92 cm (P=.000) and 1.99 cm (P=.000) on the right and left side, respectively. There was no significant difference in the mean distances to the PG and the OC between the transorbital and supraorbital approaches. Use of these approaches in tandem provided an extra working port by which structures above and below the target organ were better visualized and more easily dissected with two-handed microsurgical techniques than through a single approach. Conclusions: The precaruncular transorbital approach provided rapid, direct, coplanar access to the clivus, sella, and suprasellar/parasellar regions. The supraorbital minicraniotomy augmented access to the planum sphenoidale, sella, tuberculum sella, and suprasellar regions. These approaches provided shorter working distances, improved visualization, and working angles that offer more direct access to the pituitary gland, suprasellar region, clivus, medial and lateral cavernous sinus than the endoscopic transnasal approach alone. The combination of endoscopic approaches to the central anterior skull base significantly improved instrument access, particularly to lateral targets, as well as better visualization of the vital structures in these regions. These ports provide the surgeon with a more expansive surgical field and improved the ability to perform two-handed microsurgical dissections.

KW - Central skull base approaches

KW - Endoscopic approaches

KW - Endoscopic transnasal approach

KW - Minimally invasive surgery

KW - Supraorbital approach

KW - Transorbital approach

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77957761468&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77957761468&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.wneu.2010.03.033

DO - 10.1016/j.wneu.2010.03.033

M3 - Article

VL - 73

SP - 705

EP - 712

JO - World Neurosurgery

JF - World Neurosurgery

SN - 1878-8750

IS - 6

ER -