Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Describe the complex interplay of perspectives of physicians, administrators, and information technology staff regarding computerized physician order entry (POE) in hospitals. METHODS: Linstone's Multiple Perspectives Model provided a framework for organizing the results of a qualitative study done at four sites. Data from observation, focus groups, and formal and informal interviews were analyzed by four researchers using a grounded approach. RESULTS: It is not a simple matter of physicians hating POE and others loving it. The issues involved are both complex and emotional. All groups see both positive and negative aspects of POE. CONCLUSION: The Multiple Perspectives Model was useful for organizing a description to aid in understanding all points of view. It is imperative that those implementing POE understand all views and plan implementation strategies accordingly.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 27-31 |
| Number of pages | 5 |
| Journal | Proceedings / AMIA ... Annual Symposium. AMIA Symposium |
| State | Published - 2000 |
Fingerprint
Cite this
Multiple perspectives on physician order entry. / Ash, Joan; Gorman, Paul; Lavelle, M.; Lyman, J.
In: Proceedings / AMIA ... Annual Symposium. AMIA Symposium, 2000, p. 27-31.Research output: Contribution to journal › Article
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Multiple perspectives on physician order entry.
AU - Ash, Joan
AU - Gorman, Paul
AU - Lavelle, M.
AU - Lyman, J.
PY - 2000
Y1 - 2000
N2 - OBJECTIVE: Describe the complex interplay of perspectives of physicians, administrators, and information technology staff regarding computerized physician order entry (POE) in hospitals. METHODS: Linstone's Multiple Perspectives Model provided a framework for organizing the results of a qualitative study done at four sites. Data from observation, focus groups, and formal and informal interviews were analyzed by four researchers using a grounded approach. RESULTS: It is not a simple matter of physicians hating POE and others loving it. The issues involved are both complex and emotional. All groups see both positive and negative aspects of POE. CONCLUSION: The Multiple Perspectives Model was useful for organizing a description to aid in understanding all points of view. It is imperative that those implementing POE understand all views and plan implementation strategies accordingly.
AB - OBJECTIVE: Describe the complex interplay of perspectives of physicians, administrators, and information technology staff regarding computerized physician order entry (POE) in hospitals. METHODS: Linstone's Multiple Perspectives Model provided a framework for organizing the results of a qualitative study done at four sites. Data from observation, focus groups, and formal and informal interviews were analyzed by four researchers using a grounded approach. RESULTS: It is not a simple matter of physicians hating POE and others loving it. The issues involved are both complex and emotional. All groups see both positive and negative aspects of POE. CONCLUSION: The Multiple Perspectives Model was useful for organizing a description to aid in understanding all points of view. It is imperative that those implementing POE understand all views and plan implementation strategies accordingly.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0034575793&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0034575793&partnerID=8YFLogxK
M3 - Article
C2 - 11079838
AN - SCOPUS:0034575793
SP - 27
EP - 31
JO - Proceedings / AMIA . Annual Symposium. AMIA Symposium
JF - Proceedings / AMIA . Annual Symposium. AMIA Symposium
SN - 1531-605X
ER -