Multi-institutional survey on imaging practice patterns in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma

Avinash R. Kambadakone, Atif Zaheer, Ott Le, Priya Bhosale, Jeffrey Meier, Alexander Guimaraes, Zarine Shah, David M. Hough, Lorenzo Mannelli, Erik Soloff, Arnold Friedman, Eric Tamm

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: To study the practice patterns for performance and interpretation of CT/MRI imaging studies in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) at multiple institutions using a survey-based assessment. Methods: In this study, abdominal radiologists/body imagers on the Society of Abdominal Radiology disease-focused panel for PDAC and from multiple institutions participated in an online survey. The survey was designed to investigate the imaging and reporting practice patterns for PDAC. The survey questionnaire addressed the experience of referring providers, choice of imaging modality for diagnosis and follow-up of PDAC, structured imaging templates utilization for PDAC, and experiences with the use of structured reports. Results: The response rate was 89.6% (43/48), with majority of the respondents working in a teaching hospital or academic research center (95.4%). While 86% of radiologists reported use of structured reporting templates in their practice, only 60.5% used standardized templates specific to PDAC. This lower percentage was despite most of them (77%) being aware of existence of PDAC-specific templates and recognizing their benefits, such as preference by referring providers (83%), improved uniformity (100%), and higher accuracy of reports (76.2%). The common impediments to the use of PDAC-specific templates were interference with efficient workflow (67.5%), lack of interest (52.5%), and complexity of existing templates (47.5%). With regards to imaging practice, 92.7% (n = 40/43) of respondents reported performing dynamic multiphasic pancreatic protocol CT for evaluation of patients with initial suspicion or staging of PDAC. Conclusion: Structured reporting templates for PDAC are not universally utilized in subspecialty abdominal/body imaging practices due to concerns of interference with efficient workflow and complexity of templates. Multiphasic pancreatic protocol CT is most frequently performed for evaluation of PDAC.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1-8
Number of pages8
JournalAbdominal Radiology
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - Dec 26 2017

Fingerprint

Adenocarcinoma
Workflow
Surveys and Questionnaires
Radiology
Teaching Hospitals
Research

Keywords

  • CT
  • MRI
  • Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma
  • Structured reporting

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology
  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging
  • Gastroenterology
  • Urology

Cite this

Multi-institutional survey on imaging practice patterns in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. / Kambadakone, Avinash R.; Zaheer, Atif; Le, Ott; Bhosale, Priya; Meier, Jeffrey; Guimaraes, Alexander; Shah, Zarine; Hough, David M.; Mannelli, Lorenzo; Soloff, Erik; Friedman, Arnold; Tamm, Eric.

In: Abdominal Radiology, 26.12.2017, p. 1-8.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Kambadakone, AR, Zaheer, A, Le, O, Bhosale, P, Meier, J, Guimaraes, A, Shah, Z, Hough, DM, Mannelli, L, Soloff, E, Friedman, A & Tamm, E 2017, 'Multi-institutional survey on imaging practice patterns in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma', Abdominal Radiology, pp. 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-017-1433-8
Kambadakone, Avinash R. ; Zaheer, Atif ; Le, Ott ; Bhosale, Priya ; Meier, Jeffrey ; Guimaraes, Alexander ; Shah, Zarine ; Hough, David M. ; Mannelli, Lorenzo ; Soloff, Erik ; Friedman, Arnold ; Tamm, Eric. / Multi-institutional survey on imaging practice patterns in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. In: Abdominal Radiology. 2017 ; pp. 1-8.
@article{9308b447679149d1a6a7006a24ef0285,
title = "Multi-institutional survey on imaging practice patterns in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma",
abstract = "Purpose: To study the practice patterns for performance and interpretation of CT/MRI imaging studies in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) at multiple institutions using a survey-based assessment. Methods: In this study, abdominal radiologists/body imagers on the Society of Abdominal Radiology disease-focused panel for PDAC and from multiple institutions participated in an online survey. The survey was designed to investigate the imaging and reporting practice patterns for PDAC. The survey questionnaire addressed the experience of referring providers, choice of imaging modality for diagnosis and follow-up of PDAC, structured imaging templates utilization for PDAC, and experiences with the use of structured reports. Results: The response rate was 89.6{\%} (43/48), with majority of the respondents working in a teaching hospital or academic research center (95.4{\%}). While 86{\%} of radiologists reported use of structured reporting templates in their practice, only 60.5{\%} used standardized templates specific to PDAC. This lower percentage was despite most of them (77{\%}) being aware of existence of PDAC-specific templates and recognizing their benefits, such as preference by referring providers (83{\%}), improved uniformity (100{\%}), and higher accuracy of reports (76.2{\%}). The common impediments to the use of PDAC-specific templates were interference with efficient workflow (67.5{\%}), lack of interest (52.5{\%}), and complexity of existing templates (47.5{\%}). With regards to imaging practice, 92.7{\%} (n = 40/43) of respondents reported performing dynamic multiphasic pancreatic protocol CT for evaluation of patients with initial suspicion or staging of PDAC. Conclusion: Structured reporting templates for PDAC are not universally utilized in subspecialty abdominal/body imaging practices due to concerns of interference with efficient workflow and complexity of templates. Multiphasic pancreatic protocol CT is most frequently performed for evaluation of PDAC.",
keywords = "CT, MRI, Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, Structured reporting",
author = "Kambadakone, {Avinash R.} and Atif Zaheer and Ott Le and Priya Bhosale and Jeffrey Meier and Alexander Guimaraes and Zarine Shah and Hough, {David M.} and Lorenzo Mannelli and Erik Soloff and Arnold Friedman and Eric Tamm",
year = "2017",
month = "12",
day = "26",
doi = "10.1007/s00261-017-1433-8",
language = "English (US)",
pages = "1--8",
journal = "Abdominal Radiology",
issn = "2366-004X",
publisher = "Springer New York",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Multi-institutional survey on imaging practice patterns in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma

AU - Kambadakone, Avinash R.

AU - Zaheer, Atif

AU - Le, Ott

AU - Bhosale, Priya

AU - Meier, Jeffrey

AU - Guimaraes, Alexander

AU - Shah, Zarine

AU - Hough, David M.

AU - Mannelli, Lorenzo

AU - Soloff, Erik

AU - Friedman, Arnold

AU - Tamm, Eric

PY - 2017/12/26

Y1 - 2017/12/26

N2 - Purpose: To study the practice patterns for performance and interpretation of CT/MRI imaging studies in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) at multiple institutions using a survey-based assessment. Methods: In this study, abdominal radiologists/body imagers on the Society of Abdominal Radiology disease-focused panel for PDAC and from multiple institutions participated in an online survey. The survey was designed to investigate the imaging and reporting practice patterns for PDAC. The survey questionnaire addressed the experience of referring providers, choice of imaging modality for diagnosis and follow-up of PDAC, structured imaging templates utilization for PDAC, and experiences with the use of structured reports. Results: The response rate was 89.6% (43/48), with majority of the respondents working in a teaching hospital or academic research center (95.4%). While 86% of radiologists reported use of structured reporting templates in their practice, only 60.5% used standardized templates specific to PDAC. This lower percentage was despite most of them (77%) being aware of existence of PDAC-specific templates and recognizing their benefits, such as preference by referring providers (83%), improved uniformity (100%), and higher accuracy of reports (76.2%). The common impediments to the use of PDAC-specific templates were interference with efficient workflow (67.5%), lack of interest (52.5%), and complexity of existing templates (47.5%). With regards to imaging practice, 92.7% (n = 40/43) of respondents reported performing dynamic multiphasic pancreatic protocol CT for evaluation of patients with initial suspicion or staging of PDAC. Conclusion: Structured reporting templates for PDAC are not universally utilized in subspecialty abdominal/body imaging practices due to concerns of interference with efficient workflow and complexity of templates. Multiphasic pancreatic protocol CT is most frequently performed for evaluation of PDAC.

AB - Purpose: To study the practice patterns for performance and interpretation of CT/MRI imaging studies in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) at multiple institutions using a survey-based assessment. Methods: In this study, abdominal radiologists/body imagers on the Society of Abdominal Radiology disease-focused panel for PDAC and from multiple institutions participated in an online survey. The survey was designed to investigate the imaging and reporting practice patterns for PDAC. The survey questionnaire addressed the experience of referring providers, choice of imaging modality for diagnosis and follow-up of PDAC, structured imaging templates utilization for PDAC, and experiences with the use of structured reports. Results: The response rate was 89.6% (43/48), with majority of the respondents working in a teaching hospital or academic research center (95.4%). While 86% of radiologists reported use of structured reporting templates in their practice, only 60.5% used standardized templates specific to PDAC. This lower percentage was despite most of them (77%) being aware of existence of PDAC-specific templates and recognizing their benefits, such as preference by referring providers (83%), improved uniformity (100%), and higher accuracy of reports (76.2%). The common impediments to the use of PDAC-specific templates were interference with efficient workflow (67.5%), lack of interest (52.5%), and complexity of existing templates (47.5%). With regards to imaging practice, 92.7% (n = 40/43) of respondents reported performing dynamic multiphasic pancreatic protocol CT for evaluation of patients with initial suspicion or staging of PDAC. Conclusion: Structured reporting templates for PDAC are not universally utilized in subspecialty abdominal/body imaging practices due to concerns of interference with efficient workflow and complexity of templates. Multiphasic pancreatic protocol CT is most frequently performed for evaluation of PDAC.

KW - CT

KW - MRI

KW - Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma

KW - Structured reporting

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85038931732&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85038931732&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s00261-017-1433-8

DO - 10.1007/s00261-017-1433-8

M3 - Article

C2 - 29277858

AN - SCOPUS:85038931732

SP - 1

EP - 8

JO - Abdominal Radiology

JF - Abdominal Radiology

SN - 2366-004X

ER -