Modeling subdiffusive light scattering by incorporating the tissue phase function and detector numerical aperture

Anouk L. Post, Steven Jacques, Henricus J.C.M. Sterenborg, DIrk J. Faber, Ton G. Van Leeuwen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

12 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

To detect small-scale changes in tissue with optical techniques, small sampling volumes and, therefore, short source-detector separations are required. In this case, reflectance measurements are not adequately described by the diffusion approximation. Previous studies related subdiffusive reflectance to γ or σ which parameterize the phase function. Recently, it was demonstrated that σ predicts subdiffusive reflectance better than γ, and that σ becomes less predictive for lower numerical apertures (NAs). We derive and evaluate the parameter RpNA, which incorporates the NA of the detector and the integral of the phase function over the NA in the backward and forward directions. Monte Carlo simulations are performed for overlapping source/detector geometries for a range of phase functions, reduced scattering coefficients, NAs, and source/detector diameters. RpNA improves prediction of the measured reflectance compared to γ and σ. It is, therefore, expected that RpNA will improve derivation of optical properties from subdiffusive measurements.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number050501
JournalJournal of Biomedical Optics
Volume22
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - 2017

Fingerprint

numerical aperture
Light scattering
light scattering
Tissue
Detectors
reflectance
detectors
Reflectometers
scattering coefficients
derivation
Optical properties
sampling
Scattering
Sampling
optical properties
Geometry
geometry
predictions
approximation
simulation

Keywords

  • backscattering
  • optical properties
  • reflectance spectroscopy
  • scattering phase function
  • subdiffusive scattering

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics
  • Biomaterials
  • Biomedical Engineering

Cite this

Modeling subdiffusive light scattering by incorporating the tissue phase function and detector numerical aperture. / Post, Anouk L.; Jacques, Steven; Sterenborg, Henricus J.C.M.; Faber, DIrk J.; Van Leeuwen, Ton G.

In: Journal of Biomedical Optics, Vol. 22, No. 5, 050501, 2017.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Post, Anouk L. ; Jacques, Steven ; Sterenborg, Henricus J.C.M. ; Faber, DIrk J. ; Van Leeuwen, Ton G. / Modeling subdiffusive light scattering by incorporating the tissue phase function and detector numerical aperture. In: Journal of Biomedical Optics. 2017 ; Vol. 22, No. 5.
@article{5b6c6d49b35f4ac7b229257d99f12488,
title = "Modeling subdiffusive light scattering by incorporating the tissue phase function and detector numerical aperture",
abstract = "To detect small-scale changes in tissue with optical techniques, small sampling volumes and, therefore, short source-detector separations are required. In this case, reflectance measurements are not adequately described by the diffusion approximation. Previous studies related subdiffusive reflectance to γ or σ which parameterize the phase function. Recently, it was demonstrated that σ predicts subdiffusive reflectance better than γ, and that σ becomes less predictive for lower numerical apertures (NAs). We derive and evaluate the parameter RpNA, which incorporates the NA of the detector and the integral of the phase function over the NA in the backward and forward directions. Monte Carlo simulations are performed for overlapping source/detector geometries for a range of phase functions, reduced scattering coefficients, NAs, and source/detector diameters. RpNA improves prediction of the measured reflectance compared to γ and σ. It is, therefore, expected that RpNA will improve derivation of optical properties from subdiffusive measurements.",
keywords = "backscattering, optical properties, reflectance spectroscopy, scattering phase function, subdiffusive scattering",
author = "Post, {Anouk L.} and Steven Jacques and Sterenborg, {Henricus J.C.M.} and Faber, {DIrk J.} and {Van Leeuwen}, {Ton G.}",
year = "2017",
doi = "10.1117/1.JBO.22.5.050501",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "22",
journal = "Journal of Biomedical Optics",
issn = "1083-3668",
publisher = "SPIE",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Modeling subdiffusive light scattering by incorporating the tissue phase function and detector numerical aperture

AU - Post, Anouk L.

AU - Jacques, Steven

AU - Sterenborg, Henricus J.C.M.

AU - Faber, DIrk J.

AU - Van Leeuwen, Ton G.

PY - 2017

Y1 - 2017

N2 - To detect small-scale changes in tissue with optical techniques, small sampling volumes and, therefore, short source-detector separations are required. In this case, reflectance measurements are not adequately described by the diffusion approximation. Previous studies related subdiffusive reflectance to γ or σ which parameterize the phase function. Recently, it was demonstrated that σ predicts subdiffusive reflectance better than γ, and that σ becomes less predictive for lower numerical apertures (NAs). We derive and evaluate the parameter RpNA, which incorporates the NA of the detector and the integral of the phase function over the NA in the backward and forward directions. Monte Carlo simulations are performed for overlapping source/detector geometries for a range of phase functions, reduced scattering coefficients, NAs, and source/detector diameters. RpNA improves prediction of the measured reflectance compared to γ and σ. It is, therefore, expected that RpNA will improve derivation of optical properties from subdiffusive measurements.

AB - To detect small-scale changes in tissue with optical techniques, small sampling volumes and, therefore, short source-detector separations are required. In this case, reflectance measurements are not adequately described by the diffusion approximation. Previous studies related subdiffusive reflectance to γ or σ which parameterize the phase function. Recently, it was demonstrated that σ predicts subdiffusive reflectance better than γ, and that σ becomes less predictive for lower numerical apertures (NAs). We derive and evaluate the parameter RpNA, which incorporates the NA of the detector and the integral of the phase function over the NA in the backward and forward directions. Monte Carlo simulations are performed for overlapping source/detector geometries for a range of phase functions, reduced scattering coefficients, NAs, and source/detector diameters. RpNA improves prediction of the measured reflectance compared to γ and σ. It is, therefore, expected that RpNA will improve derivation of optical properties from subdiffusive measurements.

KW - backscattering

KW - optical properties

KW - reflectance spectroscopy

KW - scattering phase function

KW - subdiffusive scattering

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85019976928&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85019976928&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1117/1.JBO.22.5.050501

DO - 10.1117/1.JBO.22.5.050501

M3 - Article

C2 - 28530013

AN - SCOPUS:85019976928

VL - 22

JO - Journal of Biomedical Optics

JF - Journal of Biomedical Optics

SN - 1083-3668

IS - 5

M1 - 050501

ER -