Minimally invasive surgery of the esophagus and stomach

Thadeus L. Trus, John Hunter

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

37 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Minimally invasive surgery has assumed an ever-expanding role in gastrointestinal surgery since the introduction of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. This review describes some of the more common minimally invasive procedures of the esophagus and stomach, with particular attention to technique. DATA SOURCES: A literature review of minimally invasive surgery of the esophagus and stomach was conducted. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic (and thoracoscopic) approaches for gastroesophageal reflux disease appear to have excellent operative and short-term follow-up results. Long-term follow-up data, however, remain unobtainable for several more years. Limited reports of esophageal cardiomyotomy, paraesophageal hernia repair, and gastric surgery for peptic ulcer disease performed through a minimally invasive approach are encouraging. Experience with resection of esophageal and gastric neoplasia is limited to a few specialized centers. Results should be scrutinized and compared with open operation before proclaiming the benefits of a minimally invasive approach.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)242-255
Number of pages14
JournalAmerican Journal of Surgery
Volume173
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1997
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures
Esophagus
Stomach
Hiatal Hernia
Herniorrhaphy
Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
Gastroesophageal Reflux
Peptic Ulcer
Neoplasms

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Cite this

Minimally invasive surgery of the esophagus and stomach. / Trus, Thadeus L.; Hunter, John.

In: American Journal of Surgery, Vol. 173, No. 3, 03.1997, p. 242-255.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{dfdcf2c636254fc6afc387a862df2898,
title = "Minimally invasive surgery of the esophagus and stomach",
abstract = "BACKGROUND: Minimally invasive surgery has assumed an ever-expanding role in gastrointestinal surgery since the introduction of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. This review describes some of the more common minimally invasive procedures of the esophagus and stomach, with particular attention to technique. DATA SOURCES: A literature review of minimally invasive surgery of the esophagus and stomach was conducted. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic (and thoracoscopic) approaches for gastroesophageal reflux disease appear to have excellent operative and short-term follow-up results. Long-term follow-up data, however, remain unobtainable for several more years. Limited reports of esophageal cardiomyotomy, paraesophageal hernia repair, and gastric surgery for peptic ulcer disease performed through a minimally invasive approach are encouraging. Experience with resection of esophageal and gastric neoplasia is limited to a few specialized centers. Results should be scrutinized and compared with open operation before proclaiming the benefits of a minimally invasive approach.",
author = "Trus, {Thadeus L.} and John Hunter",
year = "1997",
month = "3",
doi = "10.1016/S0002-9610(97)89601-8",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "173",
pages = "242--255",
journal = "American Journal of Surgery",
issn = "0002-9610",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Minimally invasive surgery of the esophagus and stomach

AU - Trus, Thadeus L.

AU - Hunter, John

PY - 1997/3

Y1 - 1997/3

N2 - BACKGROUND: Minimally invasive surgery has assumed an ever-expanding role in gastrointestinal surgery since the introduction of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. This review describes some of the more common minimally invasive procedures of the esophagus and stomach, with particular attention to technique. DATA SOURCES: A literature review of minimally invasive surgery of the esophagus and stomach was conducted. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic (and thoracoscopic) approaches for gastroesophageal reflux disease appear to have excellent operative and short-term follow-up results. Long-term follow-up data, however, remain unobtainable for several more years. Limited reports of esophageal cardiomyotomy, paraesophageal hernia repair, and gastric surgery for peptic ulcer disease performed through a minimally invasive approach are encouraging. Experience with resection of esophageal and gastric neoplasia is limited to a few specialized centers. Results should be scrutinized and compared with open operation before proclaiming the benefits of a minimally invasive approach.

AB - BACKGROUND: Minimally invasive surgery has assumed an ever-expanding role in gastrointestinal surgery since the introduction of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. This review describes some of the more common minimally invasive procedures of the esophagus and stomach, with particular attention to technique. DATA SOURCES: A literature review of minimally invasive surgery of the esophagus and stomach was conducted. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic (and thoracoscopic) approaches for gastroesophageal reflux disease appear to have excellent operative and short-term follow-up results. Long-term follow-up data, however, remain unobtainable for several more years. Limited reports of esophageal cardiomyotomy, paraesophageal hernia repair, and gastric surgery for peptic ulcer disease performed through a minimally invasive approach are encouraging. Experience with resection of esophageal and gastric neoplasia is limited to a few specialized centers. Results should be scrutinized and compared with open operation before proclaiming the benefits of a minimally invasive approach.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0030894520&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0030894520&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/S0002-9610(97)89601-8

DO - 10.1016/S0002-9610(97)89601-8

M3 - Article

VL - 173

SP - 242

EP - 255

JO - American Journal of Surgery

JF - American Journal of Surgery

SN - 0002-9610

IS - 3

ER -