Minimally invasive compared to open microdiscectomy for lumbar disc herniation

Darryl Lau, Seunggu (Jude) Han, Jasmine G. Lee, Daniel C. Lu, Dean Chou

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

24 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Before the advent of minimally invasive surgery for microdiscectomy, an open microdiscectomy had been the standard surgical intervention. Minimally invasive techniques have recently become more popular based upon the premise that smaller, less traumatic incisions should afford better recovery times and outcomes. From 2005 to 2008 we analyzed the outcomes of 25 patients who received an open microdiscectomy compared to 20 patients who received a minimally invasive microdiscectomy by the senior author (DC) in the lumbar region for disc herniation. A retrospective analysis was performed by carefully reviewing medical records for perioperative and immediate postoperative outcomes, and clinical follow-up was obtained either in the clinic or by telephone. There were no statistically significant differences between the minimally invasive and open groups in terms of operative time, length of stay, neurological outcome, complication rate, or change in pain score (pain improvement).

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)81-84
Number of pages4
JournalJournal of Clinical Neuroscience
Volume18
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2011
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Pain
Lumbosacral Region
Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures
Operative Time
Telephone
Medical Records
Length of Stay

Keywords

  • Disc herniation
  • Discectomy
  • Lumbar
  • Microdiscectomy
  • Minimally invasive
  • Open microdiscectomy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Neurology
  • Physiology (medical)
  • Neurology

Cite this

Minimally invasive compared to open microdiscectomy for lumbar disc herniation. / Lau, Darryl; Han, Seunggu (Jude); Lee, Jasmine G.; Lu, Daniel C.; Chou, Dean.

In: Journal of Clinical Neuroscience, Vol. 18, No. 1, 01.01.2011, p. 81-84.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Lau, Darryl ; Han, Seunggu (Jude) ; Lee, Jasmine G. ; Lu, Daniel C. ; Chou, Dean. / Minimally invasive compared to open microdiscectomy for lumbar disc herniation. In: Journal of Clinical Neuroscience. 2011 ; Vol. 18, No. 1. pp. 81-84.
@article{ecb73e013281462ca147062df7134802,
title = "Minimally invasive compared to open microdiscectomy for lumbar disc herniation",
abstract = "Before the advent of minimally invasive surgery for microdiscectomy, an open microdiscectomy had been the standard surgical intervention. Minimally invasive techniques have recently become more popular based upon the premise that smaller, less traumatic incisions should afford better recovery times and outcomes. From 2005 to 2008 we analyzed the outcomes of 25 patients who received an open microdiscectomy compared to 20 patients who received a minimally invasive microdiscectomy by the senior author (DC) in the lumbar region for disc herniation. A retrospective analysis was performed by carefully reviewing medical records for perioperative and immediate postoperative outcomes, and clinical follow-up was obtained either in the clinic or by telephone. There were no statistically significant differences between the minimally invasive and open groups in terms of operative time, length of stay, neurological outcome, complication rate, or change in pain score (pain improvement).",
keywords = "Disc herniation, Discectomy, Lumbar, Microdiscectomy, Minimally invasive, Open microdiscectomy",
author = "Darryl Lau and Han, {Seunggu (Jude)} and Lee, {Jasmine G.} and Lu, {Daniel C.} and Dean Chou",
year = "2011",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jocn.2010.04.040",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "18",
pages = "81--84",
journal = "Journal of Clinical Neuroscience",
issn = "0967-5868",
publisher = "Churchill Livingstone",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Minimally invasive compared to open microdiscectomy for lumbar disc herniation

AU - Lau, Darryl

AU - Han, Seunggu (Jude)

AU - Lee, Jasmine G.

AU - Lu, Daniel C.

AU - Chou, Dean

PY - 2011/1/1

Y1 - 2011/1/1

N2 - Before the advent of minimally invasive surgery for microdiscectomy, an open microdiscectomy had been the standard surgical intervention. Minimally invasive techniques have recently become more popular based upon the premise that smaller, less traumatic incisions should afford better recovery times and outcomes. From 2005 to 2008 we analyzed the outcomes of 25 patients who received an open microdiscectomy compared to 20 patients who received a minimally invasive microdiscectomy by the senior author (DC) in the lumbar region for disc herniation. A retrospective analysis was performed by carefully reviewing medical records for perioperative and immediate postoperative outcomes, and clinical follow-up was obtained either in the clinic or by telephone. There were no statistically significant differences between the minimally invasive and open groups in terms of operative time, length of stay, neurological outcome, complication rate, or change in pain score (pain improvement).

AB - Before the advent of minimally invasive surgery for microdiscectomy, an open microdiscectomy had been the standard surgical intervention. Minimally invasive techniques have recently become more popular based upon the premise that smaller, less traumatic incisions should afford better recovery times and outcomes. From 2005 to 2008 we analyzed the outcomes of 25 patients who received an open microdiscectomy compared to 20 patients who received a minimally invasive microdiscectomy by the senior author (DC) in the lumbar region for disc herniation. A retrospective analysis was performed by carefully reviewing medical records for perioperative and immediate postoperative outcomes, and clinical follow-up was obtained either in the clinic or by telephone. There were no statistically significant differences between the minimally invasive and open groups in terms of operative time, length of stay, neurological outcome, complication rate, or change in pain score (pain improvement).

KW - Disc herniation

KW - Discectomy

KW - Lumbar

KW - Microdiscectomy

KW - Minimally invasive

KW - Open microdiscectomy

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=78650169784&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=78650169784&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jocn.2010.04.040

DO - 10.1016/j.jocn.2010.04.040

M3 - Article

VL - 18

SP - 81

EP - 84

JO - Journal of Clinical Neuroscience

JF - Journal of Clinical Neuroscience

SN - 0967-5868

IS - 1

ER -