Minimally invasive approaches to the surgical treatment of lumbar stenosis

William Aaron Kunkle, Bijan Ameri, Clifford Lin, Jayme Hiratzka

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

A literature review of minimally invasive treatment options for lumbar spinal stenosis was conducted to determine the efficacy and outcomes of existing and evolving techniques. This study focuses on minimally invasive interlaminar decompression, unilateral laminectomy for bilateral decompression, and internal indirect decompression devices/interlaminar stabilization. We found that both minimally invasive interlaminar decompression and unilateral laminectomy for bilateral decompression can lead to acceptable and effective outcomes for patients with lumbar spinal stenosis. Indirect decompression via devices that provide interlaminar stabilization, including the Superion, X-STOP, and Coflex implants, has led to mixed results, but further research is still required.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalSeminars in Spine Surgery
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2019

Fingerprint

Decompression
Pathologic Constriction
Spinal Stenosis
Laminectomy
Therapeutics
Equipment and Supplies
Research

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine

Cite this

Minimally invasive approaches to the surgical treatment of lumbar stenosis. / Kunkle, William Aaron; Ameri, Bijan; Lin, Clifford; Hiratzka, Jayme.

In: Seminars in Spine Surgery, 01.01.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{9a34a413e6424f8891be29d9b71d6fd7,
title = "Minimally invasive approaches to the surgical treatment of lumbar stenosis",
abstract = "A literature review of minimally invasive treatment options for lumbar spinal stenosis was conducted to determine the efficacy and outcomes of existing and evolving techniques. This study focuses on minimally invasive interlaminar decompression, unilateral laminectomy for bilateral decompression, and internal indirect decompression devices/interlaminar stabilization. We found that both minimally invasive interlaminar decompression and unilateral laminectomy for bilateral decompression can lead to acceptable and effective outcomes for patients with lumbar spinal stenosis. Indirect decompression via devices that provide interlaminar stabilization, including the Superion, X-STOP, and Coflex implants, has led to mixed results, but further research is still required.",
author = "Kunkle, {William Aaron} and Bijan Ameri and Clifford Lin and Jayme Hiratzka",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1053/j.semss.2019.04.008",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Seminars in Spine Surgery",
issn = "1040-7383",
publisher = "W.B. Saunders Ltd",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Minimally invasive approaches to the surgical treatment of lumbar stenosis

AU - Kunkle, William Aaron

AU - Ameri, Bijan

AU - Lin, Clifford

AU - Hiratzka, Jayme

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - A literature review of minimally invasive treatment options for lumbar spinal stenosis was conducted to determine the efficacy and outcomes of existing and evolving techniques. This study focuses on minimally invasive interlaminar decompression, unilateral laminectomy for bilateral decompression, and internal indirect decompression devices/interlaminar stabilization. We found that both minimally invasive interlaminar decompression and unilateral laminectomy for bilateral decompression can lead to acceptable and effective outcomes for patients with lumbar spinal stenosis. Indirect decompression via devices that provide interlaminar stabilization, including the Superion, X-STOP, and Coflex implants, has led to mixed results, but further research is still required.

AB - A literature review of minimally invasive treatment options for lumbar spinal stenosis was conducted to determine the efficacy and outcomes of existing and evolving techniques. This study focuses on minimally invasive interlaminar decompression, unilateral laminectomy for bilateral decompression, and internal indirect decompression devices/interlaminar stabilization. We found that both minimally invasive interlaminar decompression and unilateral laminectomy for bilateral decompression can lead to acceptable and effective outcomes for patients with lumbar spinal stenosis. Indirect decompression via devices that provide interlaminar stabilization, including the Superion, X-STOP, and Coflex implants, has led to mixed results, but further research is still required.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85065584150&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85065584150&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1053/j.semss.2019.04.008

DO - 10.1053/j.semss.2019.04.008

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85065584150

JO - Seminars in Spine Surgery

JF - Seminars in Spine Surgery

SN - 1040-7383

ER -