Mini-reoperative mitral valve surgery

Angelo Vlessis, Steven F. Bolling

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

25 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Reoperative surgery involving the atrioventricular valves places the patient at risk for cardiac or bypass graft injury upon reoperative sternotomy. Standard right thoracotomy can avoid these problems but is associated with a large incision and possibly more pulmonary complications. Methods and Results: An alternative, minimally invasive approach for reoperative atrioventricular valve surgery was studied in 22 patients. Patient age was 66 ± 10 years. Postoperative mitral regurgitation was 3.4 ± 0.3 and New York Heart Association (NYHA) Class was III/IV, despite a mean ejection fraction of 44 ± 14%. These patients had 1-4 prior procedures a mean of 5 years previously. An anterior 5th interspace incision of 5- to 10-cm was performed. A 1-cm segment of 5th rib was removed to facilitate exposure. Cardiopulmonary bypass was performed via ascending aorta or femoral artery cannula and bicaval venous cannulae. Systemic cooling (25°) and fibrillatory arrest was used. Operations performed included mitral valve repair (12), mitral valve replacement (5), prosthetic mitral valve rereplacement (4), repair of perivalvular leak (3), tricuspid valve repair (5), and atrial septal defect closures (7). Mean bypass time was 109 ± 21 minutes with a mean fibrillatory time of 62 ± 12 minutes. There was no intraoperative or 30-day mortality. Patients were weaned from ventilation at a mean of 5 hours postoperatively and received 1.3 ± 1 unit of blood. There were no wound complications or reexplorations for bleeding. At a mean follow- up of 15 ± 8 months, survivors are NYHA Class I-II. When interviewed, all patients felt their recovery was more rapid and less painful than their original sternotomy. Conclusion: This minimally invasive approach to reoperative atrioventricular valve surgery is safe and technically feasible. It has become our preferred approach to the atrioventricular valves in patients with a previous sternotomy.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)468-470
Number of pages3
JournalJournal of Cardiac Surgery
Volume13
Issue number6
StatePublished - 1998
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Mitral Valve
Sternotomy
Tricuspid Valve
Wounds and Injuries
Mitral Valve Insufficiency
Ribs
Thoracotomy
Femoral Artery
Cardiopulmonary Bypass
Ventilation
Survivors
Aorta
Hemorrhage
Transplants
Lung
Mortality

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Cite this

Vlessis, A., & Bolling, S. F. (1998). Mini-reoperative mitral valve surgery. Journal of Cardiac Surgery, 13(6), 468-470.

Mini-reoperative mitral valve surgery. / Vlessis, Angelo; Bolling, Steven F.

In: Journal of Cardiac Surgery, Vol. 13, No. 6, 1998, p. 468-470.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Vlessis, A & Bolling, SF 1998, 'Mini-reoperative mitral valve surgery', Journal of Cardiac Surgery, vol. 13, no. 6, pp. 468-470.
Vlessis A, Bolling SF. Mini-reoperative mitral valve surgery. Journal of Cardiac Surgery. 1998;13(6):468-470.
Vlessis, Angelo ; Bolling, Steven F. / Mini-reoperative mitral valve surgery. In: Journal of Cardiac Surgery. 1998 ; Vol. 13, No. 6. pp. 468-470.
@article{ff65171146b64e60a2a1d07ddc1f190f,
title = "Mini-reoperative mitral valve surgery",
abstract = "Background: Reoperative surgery involving the atrioventricular valves places the patient at risk for cardiac or bypass graft injury upon reoperative sternotomy. Standard right thoracotomy can avoid these problems but is associated with a large incision and possibly more pulmonary complications. Methods and Results: An alternative, minimally invasive approach for reoperative atrioventricular valve surgery was studied in 22 patients. Patient age was 66 ± 10 years. Postoperative mitral regurgitation was 3.4 ± 0.3 and New York Heart Association (NYHA) Class was III/IV, despite a mean ejection fraction of 44 ± 14{\%}. These patients had 1-4 prior procedures a mean of 5 years previously. An anterior 5th interspace incision of 5- to 10-cm was performed. A 1-cm segment of 5th rib was removed to facilitate exposure. Cardiopulmonary bypass was performed via ascending aorta or femoral artery cannula and bicaval venous cannulae. Systemic cooling (25°) and fibrillatory arrest was used. Operations performed included mitral valve repair (12), mitral valve replacement (5), prosthetic mitral valve rereplacement (4), repair of perivalvular leak (3), tricuspid valve repair (5), and atrial septal defect closures (7). Mean bypass time was 109 ± 21 minutes with a mean fibrillatory time of 62 ± 12 minutes. There was no intraoperative or 30-day mortality. Patients were weaned from ventilation at a mean of 5 hours postoperatively and received 1.3 ± 1 unit of blood. There were no wound complications or reexplorations for bleeding. At a mean follow- up of 15 ± 8 months, survivors are NYHA Class I-II. When interviewed, all patients felt their recovery was more rapid and less painful than their original sternotomy. Conclusion: This minimally invasive approach to reoperative atrioventricular valve surgery is safe and technically feasible. It has become our preferred approach to the atrioventricular valves in patients with a previous sternotomy.",
author = "Angelo Vlessis and Bolling, {Steven F.}",
year = "1998",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "13",
pages = "468--470",
journal = "Journal of Cardiac Surgery",
issn = "0886-0440",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Mini-reoperative mitral valve surgery

AU - Vlessis, Angelo

AU - Bolling, Steven F.

PY - 1998

Y1 - 1998

N2 - Background: Reoperative surgery involving the atrioventricular valves places the patient at risk for cardiac or bypass graft injury upon reoperative sternotomy. Standard right thoracotomy can avoid these problems but is associated with a large incision and possibly more pulmonary complications. Methods and Results: An alternative, minimally invasive approach for reoperative atrioventricular valve surgery was studied in 22 patients. Patient age was 66 ± 10 years. Postoperative mitral regurgitation was 3.4 ± 0.3 and New York Heart Association (NYHA) Class was III/IV, despite a mean ejection fraction of 44 ± 14%. These patients had 1-4 prior procedures a mean of 5 years previously. An anterior 5th interspace incision of 5- to 10-cm was performed. A 1-cm segment of 5th rib was removed to facilitate exposure. Cardiopulmonary bypass was performed via ascending aorta or femoral artery cannula and bicaval venous cannulae. Systemic cooling (25°) and fibrillatory arrest was used. Operations performed included mitral valve repair (12), mitral valve replacement (5), prosthetic mitral valve rereplacement (4), repair of perivalvular leak (3), tricuspid valve repair (5), and atrial septal defect closures (7). Mean bypass time was 109 ± 21 minutes with a mean fibrillatory time of 62 ± 12 minutes. There was no intraoperative or 30-day mortality. Patients were weaned from ventilation at a mean of 5 hours postoperatively and received 1.3 ± 1 unit of blood. There were no wound complications or reexplorations for bleeding. At a mean follow- up of 15 ± 8 months, survivors are NYHA Class I-II. When interviewed, all patients felt their recovery was more rapid and less painful than their original sternotomy. Conclusion: This minimally invasive approach to reoperative atrioventricular valve surgery is safe and technically feasible. It has become our preferred approach to the atrioventricular valves in patients with a previous sternotomy.

AB - Background: Reoperative surgery involving the atrioventricular valves places the patient at risk for cardiac or bypass graft injury upon reoperative sternotomy. Standard right thoracotomy can avoid these problems but is associated with a large incision and possibly more pulmonary complications. Methods and Results: An alternative, minimally invasive approach for reoperative atrioventricular valve surgery was studied in 22 patients. Patient age was 66 ± 10 years. Postoperative mitral regurgitation was 3.4 ± 0.3 and New York Heart Association (NYHA) Class was III/IV, despite a mean ejection fraction of 44 ± 14%. These patients had 1-4 prior procedures a mean of 5 years previously. An anterior 5th interspace incision of 5- to 10-cm was performed. A 1-cm segment of 5th rib was removed to facilitate exposure. Cardiopulmonary bypass was performed via ascending aorta or femoral artery cannula and bicaval venous cannulae. Systemic cooling (25°) and fibrillatory arrest was used. Operations performed included mitral valve repair (12), mitral valve replacement (5), prosthetic mitral valve rereplacement (4), repair of perivalvular leak (3), tricuspid valve repair (5), and atrial septal defect closures (7). Mean bypass time was 109 ± 21 minutes with a mean fibrillatory time of 62 ± 12 minutes. There was no intraoperative or 30-day mortality. Patients were weaned from ventilation at a mean of 5 hours postoperatively and received 1.3 ± 1 unit of blood. There were no wound complications or reexplorations for bleeding. At a mean follow- up of 15 ± 8 months, survivors are NYHA Class I-II. When interviewed, all patients felt their recovery was more rapid and less painful than their original sternotomy. Conclusion: This minimally invasive approach to reoperative atrioventricular valve surgery is safe and technically feasible. It has become our preferred approach to the atrioventricular valves in patients with a previous sternotomy.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0032287320&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0032287320&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 10543461

AN - SCOPUS:0032287320

VL - 13

SP - 468

EP - 470

JO - Journal of Cardiac Surgery

JF - Journal of Cardiac Surgery

SN - 0886-0440

IS - 6

ER -