Methylphenidate has nonlinear dose effects on cued response inhibition in adults but not adolescents

Nicholas W. Simon, Bita Moghaddam

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Abstract

Ongoing development of the dopamine system during adolescence may provide a partial mechanism for behavioral and psychiatric vulnerabilities. Despite early evidence for a hyperactive adolescent dopaminergic system, recent data suggest that adolescent dopamine may be functionally hypoactive compared to in adults. While this distinction has been established in response to dopaminergic drugs and natural rewards, little is known about age-related differences in cognitive efficacy of dopaminergic drugs. Using a recently established Cued Response Inhibition Task, we tested the effects of acute systemic methylphenidate, commonly known as Ritalin, on response inhibition and response initiation in adolescent and adults rats. First, we replicated previous data that adolescents are able to inhibit a response to a cue on par with adults, but are slower to produce a rewarded response after a stop cue. Next, we observed that methylphenidate modulated response inhibition in adult rats, with low dose (0.3 mg/kg) improving inhibition, and high dose (3 mg/kg) impairing performance. This dose-response pattern is commonly observed with psychostimulant cognitive modulation. In adolescents, however, methylphenidate had no effect on response inhibition at any dose. Latency of response initiation after the stop cue was not affected by methylphenidate in either adult or adolescent rats. These data establish that dose-response of a commonly prescribed psychostimulant medication is different in adolescents and adults. They further demonstrate that healthy adolescent response inhibition is not as sensitive to psychostimulants as in adults, supporting the idea that the dopamine system is hypoactive in adolescence. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled SI: Adolescent plasticity.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)171-176
Number of pages6
JournalBrain Research
Volume1654
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2017
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Methylphenidate
Cues
Dopamine
Dopamine Agents
Inhibition (Psychology)
Reward
Information Systems
Reaction Time
Psychiatry

Keywords

  • Development
  • Dopamine
  • Impulsivity
  • Instrumental behavior
  • Inverted U
  • Reward
  • Ritalin

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Neuroscience(all)
  • Molecular Biology
  • Developmental Biology
  • Clinical Neurology

Cite this

Methylphenidate has nonlinear dose effects on cued response inhibition in adults but not adolescents. / Simon, Nicholas W.; Moghaddam, Bita.

In: Brain Research, Vol. 1654, 01.01.2017, p. 171-176.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

@article{f04fb48482bd404f8da68e96d524352c,
title = "Methylphenidate has nonlinear dose effects on cued response inhibition in adults but not adolescents",
abstract = "Ongoing development of the dopamine system during adolescence may provide a partial mechanism for behavioral and psychiatric vulnerabilities. Despite early evidence for a hyperactive adolescent dopaminergic system, recent data suggest that adolescent dopamine may be functionally hypoactive compared to in adults. While this distinction has been established in response to dopaminergic drugs and natural rewards, little is known about age-related differences in cognitive efficacy of dopaminergic drugs. Using a recently established Cued Response Inhibition Task, we tested the effects of acute systemic methylphenidate, commonly known as Ritalin, on response inhibition and response initiation in adolescent and adults rats. First, we replicated previous data that adolescents are able to inhibit a response to a cue on par with adults, but are slower to produce a rewarded response after a stop cue. Next, we observed that methylphenidate modulated response inhibition in adult rats, with low dose (0.3 mg/kg) improving inhibition, and high dose (3 mg/kg) impairing performance. This dose-response pattern is commonly observed with psychostimulant cognitive modulation. In adolescents, however, methylphenidate had no effect on response inhibition at any dose. Latency of response initiation after the stop cue was not affected by methylphenidate in either adult or adolescent rats. These data establish that dose-response of a commonly prescribed psychostimulant medication is different in adolescents and adults. They further demonstrate that healthy adolescent response inhibition is not as sensitive to psychostimulants as in adults, supporting the idea that the dopamine system is hypoactive in adolescence. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled SI: Adolescent plasticity.",
keywords = "Development, Dopamine, Impulsivity, Instrumental behavior, Inverted U, Reward, Ritalin",
author = "Simon, {Nicholas W.} and Bita Moghaddam",
year = "2017",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.brainres.2016.07.027",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "1654",
pages = "171--176",
journal = "Brain Research",
issn = "0006-8993",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Methylphenidate has nonlinear dose effects on cued response inhibition in adults but not adolescents

AU - Simon, Nicholas W.

AU - Moghaddam, Bita

PY - 2017/1/1

Y1 - 2017/1/1

N2 - Ongoing development of the dopamine system during adolescence may provide a partial mechanism for behavioral and psychiatric vulnerabilities. Despite early evidence for a hyperactive adolescent dopaminergic system, recent data suggest that adolescent dopamine may be functionally hypoactive compared to in adults. While this distinction has been established in response to dopaminergic drugs and natural rewards, little is known about age-related differences in cognitive efficacy of dopaminergic drugs. Using a recently established Cued Response Inhibition Task, we tested the effects of acute systemic methylphenidate, commonly known as Ritalin, on response inhibition and response initiation in adolescent and adults rats. First, we replicated previous data that adolescents are able to inhibit a response to a cue on par with adults, but are slower to produce a rewarded response after a stop cue. Next, we observed that methylphenidate modulated response inhibition in adult rats, with low dose (0.3 mg/kg) improving inhibition, and high dose (3 mg/kg) impairing performance. This dose-response pattern is commonly observed with psychostimulant cognitive modulation. In adolescents, however, methylphenidate had no effect on response inhibition at any dose. Latency of response initiation after the stop cue was not affected by methylphenidate in either adult or adolescent rats. These data establish that dose-response of a commonly prescribed psychostimulant medication is different in adolescents and adults. They further demonstrate that healthy adolescent response inhibition is not as sensitive to psychostimulants as in adults, supporting the idea that the dopamine system is hypoactive in adolescence. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled SI: Adolescent plasticity.

AB - Ongoing development of the dopamine system during adolescence may provide a partial mechanism for behavioral and psychiatric vulnerabilities. Despite early evidence for a hyperactive adolescent dopaminergic system, recent data suggest that adolescent dopamine may be functionally hypoactive compared to in adults. While this distinction has been established in response to dopaminergic drugs and natural rewards, little is known about age-related differences in cognitive efficacy of dopaminergic drugs. Using a recently established Cued Response Inhibition Task, we tested the effects of acute systemic methylphenidate, commonly known as Ritalin, on response inhibition and response initiation in adolescent and adults rats. First, we replicated previous data that adolescents are able to inhibit a response to a cue on par with adults, but are slower to produce a rewarded response after a stop cue. Next, we observed that methylphenidate modulated response inhibition in adult rats, with low dose (0.3 mg/kg) improving inhibition, and high dose (3 mg/kg) impairing performance. This dose-response pattern is commonly observed with psychostimulant cognitive modulation. In adolescents, however, methylphenidate had no effect on response inhibition at any dose. Latency of response initiation after the stop cue was not affected by methylphenidate in either adult or adolescent rats. These data establish that dose-response of a commonly prescribed psychostimulant medication is different in adolescents and adults. They further demonstrate that healthy adolescent response inhibition is not as sensitive to psychostimulants as in adults, supporting the idea that the dopamine system is hypoactive in adolescence. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled SI: Adolescent plasticity.

KW - Development

KW - Dopamine

KW - Impulsivity

KW - Instrumental behavior

KW - Inverted U

KW - Reward

KW - Ritalin

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84997522803&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84997522803&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.brainres.2016.07.027

DO - 10.1016/j.brainres.2016.07.027

M3 - Review article

C2 - 27431940

AN - SCOPUS:84997522803

VL - 1654

SP - 171

EP - 176

JO - Brain Research

JF - Brain Research

SN - 0006-8993

ER -